Obama – Just Too Good for Us (Extraordinarily Barf-Worthy - Have Barf Bag at the Ready)

Ny Times (of course) ^ | June 2, 2018 | By Maureen Dowd Opinion Columnist

[Kartographer]

Good GOD man you posted this with No hurl alert! What’s wrong with you?

[mrsmith]

Good = unamerican.
That’s the NYTimes view of every issue.

[heights]

An ‘Enlightened Being’ that bragged about how many people he killed with Drones.

[WKTimpco]

Not barf-worthy. Just incredibly laughable.

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

We constantly disappointed him??? Who does she think he is, our Daddy?

[prophetic]

Who is this?

[Rainbow Rising]

I STILL see TONS of fools defend this clown at liberal "news" sites (big surprise).

At least once a week I see libtards on Facebook whining about how much they miss the "classy" Obamas. I can't recall a single instance in their eight year reign when Barry or Mooch behaved in a classy manner. Maybe I blinked and missed it.

[clearcarbon]

"There are more stars in the sky than grains of sand on the earth.”

[bfkirk]

She spent 99% of the article mocking 0bama as out of touch. The NYT readers are pissed at her.

[Cowboy Bob]

I may not agree politically with Maureen Dowd, but I understand that she is a loving wife and wonderful mother. LOL!

[Az Joe]

Yes

[PGalt]

PEAK intellectual INSANITY MoDo & POSBO the MOFO. Friction writer ALERT!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqUa_G1h3pw

[lefty-lie-spy]

Only 10,000 stars in the universe? Really now.
That is one of most ignorant and stupid statements ever posted here. Did you really mean to write that?

[P.O.E.]

Exerpt from : https://www.npr.org/sections/krulwich/2012/09/17/161096233/which-is-greater-the-number-of-sand-grains-on-earth-or-stars-in-the-sky

“... if you assume a grain of sand has an average size and you calculate how many grains are in a teaspoon and then multiply by all the beaches and deserts in the world, the Earth has roughly (and we’re speaking very roughly here) 7.5 x 10^18 grains of sand, or seven quintillion, five hundred quadrillion grains....

....when you look up, even on a clear and starry night, you won’t see very many stars. Blatner says the number is a low, low “several thousand,” which gives the sand grain folks a landslide victory......

....Our stargazer gets a Hubble telescope and a calculator, so now we can count distant galaxies, faint stars, red dwarfs, everything we’ve ever recorded in the sky, and boom! Now the population of stars jumps enormously, to 70 thousand million, million, million stars in the observable universe (a 2003 estimate), so that we’ve got multiple stars for every grain of sand — which means, sorry, grains, you are nowhere near as numerous as the stars.....

....So that makes stars the champions of numerosity, no?

Ummm, no. This is when Blatner hits us with his sucker punch. Yes, he says, the number of stars in the heavens is “an unbelievably large number,” but then, very matter-of-factly, he adds that you will find the same number of molecules “in just ten drops of water.”....

[Telepathic Intruder]

Lol. I said there are 10,000 times as many stars in the known universe than there are grains of sand on Earth. That's about 300 sextillion stars. Amazing, is it not? And that's only the known universe. According to inflation theory, the actual universe is at least 10³⁰ times larger than the known universe. Inflation theory is somewhat speculative, however. But it does solve some problems with the standard model of the Big Bang in simple, Occam's razor like ways.

[Doogle]

.....been saying this since he announce his candidacy.... the POS has
NPD..Narcissistic Personality Disorder ...he’s mentally ucked fup!

[ransomnote]

[Brooklyn Attitude]

This article is not nearly as pro Obama as you think.

[Liz]

The "stylish" fist lady Michelle.

[Liz]

The "stylish" fist lady Michelle.