Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kavanaugh: The Right To Keep And Bear An AR-15 Shall Not Be Infringed
Flopping Aces ^ | 07-12-18 | Daniel John Sobieski

Posted on 07/12/2018 1:13:49 PM PDT by Starman417

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 07/12/2018 1:13:49 PM PDT by Starman417
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Starman417

Maybe we can get a positive ruling on national reciprocity.


2 posted on 07/12/2018 1:16:26 PM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

3 posted on 07/12/2018 1:17:27 PM PDT by Red Badger (July 2018 - the month the world discovered the TRUTH......Q Anon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

Laws don’t stop terrorists from committing acts of terror or criminals from carrying out violent crimes.

Shooting them in the face with an AR-15 stops them quite nicely, however.


4 posted on 07/12/2018 1:17:35 PM PDT by JamesP81 (Traitors are more dangerous than enemies. Vote and act accordingly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

Would it were true....


5 posted on 07/12/2018 1:18:26 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
Maybe we can get a positive ruling on national reciprocity.

I want see 10 round magazine limits gone. I admit a lot of that is that striking down magazine bans would make the libs cry harder than national reciprocity would. There are other reasons, however, because it goes to something more fundamental, chiefly that 1) shall not be infringed means exactly what it says it means and 2) the .gov does not get to dictate to me how I defend myself.
6 posted on 07/12/2018 1:19:07 PM PDT by JamesP81 (Traitors are more dangerous than enemies. Vote and act accordingly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

The founders were very well aware that the revolution would have failed if the people were unarmed. If they had no weapons, they would have been forced to accept whatever the British thought fit to impose. No weapons means your freedom and liberty depends on those in power who have the guns being tolerant and just.


7 posted on 07/12/2018 1:19:34 PM PDT by allendale (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Yes. Either a clean national interpretation of the 2nd amendment to preempt local and state laws, else legislation, such as from Congress to make DC, as one example, accept CCW from any state. It is the federal district anyway, respect it as such.


8 posted on 07/12/2018 1:24:37 PM PDT by Reno89519 (No Amnesty! No Catch-and-Release! Just Say No to All Illegal Aliens! Arrest & Deport!y)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

"It's not heavy, it's my rifle."
9 posted on 07/12/2018 1:25:25 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

Lived in NJ my entire life, this guy is who I want on the court for the RKBA


10 posted on 07/12/2018 1:27:29 PM PDT by mrmeyer (You can't conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him. Robert Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allendale

What do you think the reaction would have been if you had handed a 1000 rounds and an AR15 to the patriots at Lexington and Concord? Probably “naw. I got his here single shot smooth bore”.


11 posted on 07/12/2018 1:29:51 PM PDT by Equine1952 (Get yourself a ticket on a common mans train of thought.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

This author was so close yet missed by a mile. The musket was not the semi auto of the day. It was the FULL AUTO of the day. The American people and the government DO NOT have the same weapons today. And There lies the problem. The government aggressively prosecutes you for possessing the same full auto weapons that thousands of non military agents and local police use everyday. They can have short Barrel shotguns and rifles, machine guns, surpressors, flash bang grenades, grenade launchers, yet these are all restricted from the American people. Why do the police and thousands of federal agents need machine guns yet they are prohibited from the people?


12 posted on 07/12/2018 1:31:04 PM PDT by precisionshootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: precisionshootist
Why do the police and thousands of federal agents need machine guns yet they are prohibited from the people?

Because leftists intend to disarm you, impoverish you, imprison you, and kill you.

They've been stacking up bodies by the millions since 1789 to prove they're serious about it.

13 posted on 07/12/2018 1:34:36 PM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: precisionshootist

My irritation lays in the fact they have them, yet I have to pay for a tax stamp, forfiet search and seizure rules, and bohica for a permit.


14 posted on 07/12/2018 1:36:32 PM PDT by Equine1952 (Get yourself a ticket on a common mans train of thought.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: precisionshootist

“The government aggressively prosecutes you for possessing the same full auto weapons that thousands of non military agents and local police use everyday.”

While the leftists’ god the Fraud gave terrorists full auto weapons and Stinger missiles.


15 posted on 07/12/2018 1:40:17 PM PDT by treetopsandroofs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

Democrats are having an apoplectic spazz further fueled by Kavanaugh reading the actual words and meaning of our precious Constitution.


16 posted on 07/12/2018 1:43:05 PM PDT by Sasparilla ( I'm Not Tired of Winning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

It has never been about guns

The Constitution is all about preventing those who would enslave us


17 posted on 07/12/2018 1:50:28 PM PDT by old curmudgeon (There is no situation so terrible, so disgraceful, that the federal government can not make worse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

These same leftists routinely claim machine guns are only good for spraying billets and killing as many people as possible. What law enforcement function requires spraying bullets and killing as many people as possible? When do we need cops to do that? We also hear full auto weapons are only good for war. Well our communities and neighborhoods are not battlefields.


18 posted on 07/12/2018 1:53:20 PM PDT by precisionshootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

Every time the gun grabbers wail about what a disaster Kavanaugh will be, I get an erection.


19 posted on 07/12/2018 1:53:56 PM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: precisionshootist

20 posted on 07/12/2018 1:56:35 PM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson