Posted on 02/20/2023 12:08:27 PM PST by ChicagoConservative27
Bush 41 was better, however that is not saying a lot.
They both sucked ass-and that’s being generous
And I’m very happy to say I did not vote for either of them
One had a part in killing Kennedy and the other a part in 911.
How about neither.
Both were / are Neocons and were against most of the Policies conservatives favor.
Both were NOT America-first.
Simple difference...
George HW Bush was an American hero...
George W Bush was an American border & culture destroyer...
Bush I was horrible*, but Bush II was worse**.
* Repudiated Reagan’s economic & tax policy, campaigned ineffectively against his real competition, which was Perot, David Souter appointment to SCOTUS
** No Child Left Behind, Medicare Modernization Act, two Wilsonian “wars for democracy”, initiated the bank bailouts with his lefty Treasury Secretary, nomination of Harriet Miers to SCOTUS
Neither.
George HW Bush VS George W Bush
Like on “Celebrity Death Match”?
Both were Swamp First
Just like Clinton
Just like Obama
Just like McCain, the designated loser
Just like Romney, the designated loser
MAGA has/had each of those scum politicians as an enemy..
Perhaps, but bias lends heavily to said programming, leading to cranuius bumpus from exchanges here.
Been there/done that on Conium maculatum 1&2.
41 coasted because of Reagan.
Exactly right. Bush was handed the keys to a well oiled, running country and he tacked to the middle and screwed America, Reagan and his shot at being a two term president with his, “read my lips..” statement.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.