Posted on 09/25/2023 8:15:48 PM PDT by Kazan
80% of the world views as as the new evil empire. India and Saudi Arabia have turned against us. We're seeing the rise of BRICS and an attempt to dump the dollar as the world's reserve currency.
Modern-day imperialism has its consequences.
A 40 man garrison on an island surrendering to a drone is different from a wounded enemy soldier in his fighting position among his troops pleading that he was wounded and wanting to be left alone.
Are you going to attack and defeat that combat front in an infantry battle to get to the enemy soldier trying to wave off a bombing drone by showing them that he was already hit once?
One man or 40 men, there’s no effective difference.
But hey, it’s okay to kill one guy surrendering because it’s just “one” guy, right?
Ukes hit medevac missions too:
https://www.reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/comments/16rur1k/russian_casevac_atv_hit_by_a_ukrainian_fpv/
Video also shows them killing an unarmed soldier as he surrendered. Death to Ukraine.
In fact, a Ukrainian spokeswoman admitted making that lie up>
The Biden regime and Deep State lie about everything but you believe everything they fed you about Russia. It's embarrassing.
If you watch these videos you realize Ukraine has a heck of a drone capability.
I don’t think so. This is the war machine of the USA.
That man was behind enemy lines in his fighting position, what do you do, call a time-out so that the enemy will let your combat team walk through their lines to pick up one of their fellow fighters who was signaling to a bombing drone to leave him alone because he was wounded?
How about leave him alone because he is wounded and no longer a threat? Would you be okay with attacking him if medics were present?
See post 29.
An entire unit on an Island surrendering to a drone is very different from a wounded enemy soldier still in the enemy fighting positions that you haven’t taken.
See post 24.
If that individual flying the drone thought that he was wounded enough to tie up resources and never return to kill then he should have left him alone, but if he didn’t think that then his job was to kill him.
“Modern-day imperialism has its consequences.”
Especially when attempted by an military still using 40 year old (plus) weapons systems, with the smallest manpower level since before WW2, run by a mob who cut their teeth HATING the military, and simultaneously, think that they can ‘transform’ their military into some Frankenstein operation with electric tanks and Lesbian flags...and then think they can pay off a relative handful of Operatives to tell us all is fine there and that WE are the problem for pointing out the above.
OK, you are going to remain child-like.
How about the fact that our deep state has caused destruction in dozens of nations over the past 50 years. How many puppet dictators have we established in Latin America? How has that experiment gone? There is a good reason why the world hates America and it is like you hinted our willingness to support evil because we are opposed to a different evil.
I’m not the one trying to excuse a warcrime.
See post 4, thanks for proving me right.
LOL, killing enemy soldiers in their foxholes with bombing attacks is not a war crime, even for snipers using a second shot.
Killing someone who was surrendering, yes
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.