Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[David] Wells Doesn't Want Bonds to Pass Ruth
MSNBC ^ | 03/08/2006 | AP

Posted on 03/08/2006 6:45:22 PM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last
To: cincinnati65
With the numbers he was putting up at the end of his first 10 years, it was possible for him to reach 700 without any steroid help.

Interesting theory ... but we'll never really know for sure now, will we?

61 posted on 03/08/2006 9:32:54 PM PST by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Rational
Do you even look at the statistics before you post? Bonds hit 46 dingers in 1993, and 37 in 1994 in only 112 games that year. His 11th year in the league, he hit 42, followed by 40 in his 12th year. No one in any testimony or statement I've read has suggested that he was using steroids in 1997.

My analysis was hardly a "fantasy" analysis. It was based on his performance at the time, and looking at several "home run hitters" from the 70's (Hank Aaron, Reggie Jackson, Mike Schmidt, Willie Stargell, etc.). If you do that, you'll see that most maintain a level performance through their 30's, with no diminishing HR counts until they get in their 40's.

In my "fantasy analysis" as you call it, I was conservative in allowing for a falloff over the latter five years where Bonds would have been between 36 and 40 years old, even though the statistics of the players mentioned above don't show a fall off.

My point is it was possible for him to hit 700 home runs in the physical condition he was in in the early 90's, and that no one has accused him of "juicing" during this time period.

So lighten up, Francis.

62 posted on 03/08/2006 9:52:46 PM PST by cincinnati65 (Go Panthers!.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: speedy

They really did? What a..holes!


63 posted on 03/08/2006 9:56:16 PM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: cincinnati65
Let's see Bonds hit 292 HR's in the first 10 years of his career and you have him hitting over 400 in his SECOND 10 years.

Some how that just doesn't equate. Especially the years of 38 to 42 when MOST unjuiced players fall off in total production of any sort.

Hank Aaron hit 42 HRs the last 3 years of his career and the Babe hit 51 total in his last 3.

The fact that BONDS NEVER HIT as many as 50 in any year except the monster year when he hit 73 i don't see how he could possibly break the record nor do I see him hitting 700.

64 posted on 03/08/2006 10:14:29 PM PST by PISANO (We will not tire......We will not falter.......We will NOT FAIL!!! .........GW Bush [Oct 2001])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

Bean him.


65 posted on 03/08/2006 10:55:57 PM PST by karnage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PISANO

Considering that he's got 708 total, and he hit 45 in 2003 and 2004, are you really telling me that you don't think he can hit 25 in each of the next two years?


66 posted on 03/09/2006 2:40:47 AM PST by cincinnati65 (Go Panthers!.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

In every ballpark Bonds visits, the fans should take up the "Let's Go BALCO" chant.


67 posted on 03/09/2006 2:45:19 AM PST by GodBlessRonaldReagan (Count Petofi will not be denied!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cincinnati65

It doesn't matter now. If ands and buts or whatever...Bonds cheated and his baseball legacy is of cheater....Did you see the size of the guy in his little drag antic

He is still taking roids.


68 posted on 03/09/2006 3:14:01 AM PST by rbmillerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Rational
One critical difference is Rose didn't cheat.

I guess we have a different definition of cheating. Personally, I consider placing wagers on your own team while being in a position to influence the game's outcome as a player/manager to be cheating.

69 posted on 03/09/2006 3:59:07 AM PST by edpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: speedy

ACtually Wells uses a George Forman Burga-Malator. But he tilts it teh other way so all the fat stays in the burger.


70 posted on 03/09/2006 6:51:45 AM PST by Holicheese ($1 tacos and $1 beers sounded like a good idea at the time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

When the Giants play outside of the friendly confines of PacBell Stadium, opposing fans are going to give * so much hell, that he is going to want to quit.


71 posted on 03/09/2006 6:53:15 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Holicheese

Yeah, even Wells himself, answering critics about being out of shape, will tell you that you "can't injure fat." Or, as Sonny Jurgenson used to say, "I don't throw with my stomach."


72 posted on 03/09/2006 7:11:15 AM PST by speedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: edpc
I guess we have a different definition of cheating. Personally, I consider placing wagers on your own team while being in a position to influence the game's outcome as a player/manager to be cheating.

The betting in question was at a time in which he was managing the Reds and had already been crowned hit king. Nothing in his stats suggest he didnt play his hardest during his playing days even if he was betting before managing unless you consider betting on yourself to succeed is harmful to one's game... but thats another discussion.

I don't think you can parallel Rose betting as a manager after his record was set with Bond's steroid induced HR chase that he will likely reach.

73 posted on 03/09/2006 7:22:24 AM PST by smith288 (http://angryprogrammer.typepad.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Many sports writers have already talked about not voting for Bonds when his time comes to go to the hall.

He is a disgrace and baseball is tarnished if his entire playing record, except for games played and dates, is not stricken. He is like the sprinter who has his medal and record stricken, he is a cheater and should be shunned.

Wells is correct but I think that without drugs, it will be difficult for Bonds to come around on a fast ball this season. To think that at the age most players retire because of their skills fading, Bonds had his best years, because of drugging, because he is a cheater, and he needs to be sanctioned.
74 posted on 03/09/2006 7:31:07 AM PST by Final Authority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smith288
I don't think you can parallel Rose betting as a manager after his record was set with Bond's steroid induced HR chase that he will likely reach.

The biggest problem Rose has is his incrementalism. First, (after over a decade of lying) it was betting on sports, but not baseball. Then it was baseball, but not his team. After that, it was for his team, but only to win. Given the track record of lies, he's not credible. We'll probably get the same from Barry down the road. He stands by not "knowingly" taking steroids, for now. That's likely to evolve into...."Well, it wasn't illegal at the time." That's my parallel.

75 posted on 03/09/2006 7:40:26 AM PST by edpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: edpc
The case against Rose is pretty much surrounding his betting during managing. Thats where the beef baseball brought against him.

With Bonds... the issue is prior to the record being broken and what's worse, is that baseball seems largely uninterested.
76 posted on 03/09/2006 7:49:02 AM PST by smith288 (http://angryprogrammer.typepad.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
[H.G.] Wells Allows Ruth to Re-pass Bonds
77 posted on 03/09/2006 7:52:08 AM PST by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: speedy

Every season Wells throws a roll and is out for a month.
The guy needs to take better care of himselfr and get on the "program". If he lost 100 pounds he would still be enormous.


78 posted on 03/09/2006 7:59:43 AM PST by Holicheese ($1 tacos and $1 beers sounded like a good idea at the time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: misterrob
Bonds was a legit 40/40 guy for years.

Sort of, but not exactly. He only accomplished this once (1996), and came close one other time (1997, when he hit 40 home runs and stole 37 bases).

He would have retired with 500 steals and 500 HRs and no one has or will ever duplicate that feat.

Alex Rodriguez would have had a good chance of doing this if he had stayed in Seattle. His base-stealing dropped off once he signed with Texas and became more of a slugger with that big contract . . . and the Yankees have never been a big base-stealing team to begin with.

I think he looked at the attention that other players received and couldn't stand it even though he had 3 MVPs. The roids gave him some extra HR power and prolonged his career.

I agree, and I think the "career-prolonging" part of this is bigger than most people realize.

79 posted on 03/09/2006 8:17:55 AM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Just on general principles, because he's a rotten human being, a cheater and a liar, if I were a pitcher in the Majors, I'd plunk Barry Bonds with a fastball in his plush derriere every time he stepped up to the plate.

Not like Bonds is going to steal 30 bases on bum knees, so he can't hurt you that way, and he never gets the chance to hit the homer that ties Ruth or passes Aaron.

But more than that, it sends a message: we will not allow cheaters and liars to prosper in this game. What do you think this is? democrat (small 'd' intentional) politics where those things are prerequisites for success?


80 posted on 03/09/2006 8:24:34 AM PST by Wombat101 (Islam: Turning everything it touches to Shi'ite since 632 AD...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson