Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Six Mysteries of Our Solar System: Its history raises a lot of questions
Softpedia ^ | 29th of January 2009 | Tudor Vieru

Posted on 02/06/2009 9:27:47 AM PST by SunkenCiv

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: dragnet2

Nice! I went up to the local observatory about twenty-some years ago, and got to view Saturn through a Celestron C-11 (or maybe it was a C-13, I don’t recall and don’t want to try to look it up). It was obviously ringed, but it was pretty small to the eye. :’)


21 posted on 02/06/2009 10:53:18 AM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

The image above was enlarged. However through the eyepiece the planet is much clearer, in focus, with much better surface or atmospheric and ring detail visible, as opposed to what the camera captured in that image.


22 posted on 02/06/2009 2:53:23 PM PST by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Every object in our solar system has gravity that pulls on every other body. When an object travels through space one can tell by the wobbles in its path when some heavy body is pulling on it from some direction. One can use this information to calculate the mass and location of the unseen heavy body.

This is how planet X was “discovered”. Its location is so far from the sun that it must be cold, and other bodies out that far have been icy objects. (Volatile materials boil off from the inner planets and then get cold trapped by planets out far from the sun where it is colder. (Kind of like your warm breath freezing out on your window in winter.)

It is hard to see this body because it is cold, dark and far away. As to the size of it, they have to guess what it is made of and then use the guessed density to calculate the size. Its not impossible to detect, just too hard for us at the moment.

The last bit in the article about planets falling into the sun or each other is hooey. We might have asteroids hit a planet, or something come from outside our solar system to mess things up, but that is way beyond unlikely. The vast majority of objects with erratic paths crashed into planets and each other long ago so the only ones left now have pretty regular orbits that do not intersect.


23 posted on 02/08/2009 5:51:33 AM PST by helpfulresearcher (Bipartisanship: The PC Term for Collaboration with the Enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

More like a person who cannot see well in daylight but has great night vision.


24 posted on 02/08/2009 5:56:16 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ (Chevron 7 will not engage!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

They thought they saw it in 2005: http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2005/29jul_planetx.htm as a freeper posted above . I was wondering if Hubble had been used to look for it yet, and could not find any reliable images. If it had been found then it is likely Hubble would have been used to image it.

Apparently the jury is still out on the whole planet x thing. At http://space.y2u.co.uk/Astronomy_Planet_X.htm there is a good discussion of Planet X. Previous observations were found to be unreliable, and gravitational data was noisy, but more recent data suggests something may be there but not easy to locate precisely.


25 posted on 02/08/2009 6:19:16 AM PST by helpfulresearcher (Bipartisanship: The PC Term for Collaboration with the Enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: helpfulresearcher

That’s my point. “wobbles” or something like it would be “indirect” evidence. The article said that “direct or even indirect observations of this body are impossible to date”. Wouldn’t gravitational forces on neighboring bodies constitute “indirect” evidence?


26 posted on 02/09/2009 6:23:23 AM PST by Sopater (I'm so sick of atheists shoving their religion in my face.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Yes you are right. It would. The article was partly hooey. Especially the last paragraph of it.


27 posted on 02/09/2009 7:38:41 AM PST by helpfulresearcher (Bipartisanship: The PC Term for Collaboration with the Enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf; SunkenCiv; Quix

Do you know what this would mean from NASA’s SOHO
taken on 3/27/09
http://sohodata.nascom.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/data_query_search_movie

SOHO Nasa image can be found at:
http://sohodata.nascom.nasa.gov/cgi-b...
Select LASCO C3 and enter start and end dates 2009/03/27
scroll through images until you reach the time stamp 3:18


28 posted on 05/07/2009 8:54:08 PM PDT by TaraP (The RAPTURE: Separation of Church and State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TaraP

Sorry . . . I’m a pathetically ignorant layman about such things.


29 posted on 05/07/2009 8:54:46 PM PDT by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Quix

30 posted on 05/07/2009 8:57:09 PM PDT by TaraP (The RAPTURE: Separation of Church and State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: TaraP

Pretty.

. . . I’m partial to blue . . .

Still quite lost on my eyes and knowledge.

Thanks.


31 posted on 05/07/2009 8:58:11 PM PDT by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Quix
NASA took this photo on 3/27/2009 the Winged object is in the photo which some say is this Planet X...I was just reading about Summerian Culture, they also have a winged globe as a symbol for a traveling planet Here it is Kinda looks like the object in the photo
32 posted on 05/07/2009 9:02:26 PM PDT by TaraP (The RAPTURE: Separation of Church and State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: TaraP

Hmmmmm

Very interesting.

Curious.

Thx.


33 posted on 05/07/2009 9:27:03 PM PDT by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: TaraP

can’t pull up either page- any better link?


34 posted on 05/08/2009 5:17:45 AM PDT by silverleaf ("Never forget that everything Hitler did in Germany was legal ( Martin Luther King))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

Try this youtube link, then follow to the directions to the left to get to the NASA Site for this......

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mm2kaCJvx6w


35 posted on 05/08/2009 10:07:49 AM PDT by TaraP (The RAPTURE: Separation of Church and State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: TaraP

wth makes the “wings” - are they rings?


36 posted on 05/08/2009 10:19:54 AM PDT by silverleaf ("Never forget that everything Hitler did in Germany was legal ( Martin Luther King))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: TaraP

debunked?
http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/planetx/soho.html


37 posted on 05/08/2009 10:38:20 AM PDT by silverleaf ("Never forget that everything Hitler did in Germany was legal ( Martin Luther King))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

In post #30 you can see the object does look winged.

I enhanced that photo on my computer...

I just think it is kinda odd that in Summerian Culture they have a Winged globe or object Same looking Object) they knew as a traveling planet....

Is it Nibiru? I don’t know, their is so much controversy it is hard to know the truth.....


38 posted on 05/08/2009 10:39:47 AM PDT by TaraP (The RAPTURE: Separation of Church and State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

This is my issue with this....

How sure can we be that the Gov’t would actually let us know they have a unknown planet in their site....

I think within a year, if this planet does exist, we will all be able to see it with the naked eye, IMO that is when the truth will prevail on this Nibiru controversy.


39 posted on 05/08/2009 10:44:04 AM PDT by TaraP (The RAPTURE: Separation of Church and State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: TaraP

I beleive its a planet of fierce warrior women who can kill you with he blink of an eye ...


40 posted on 05/08/2009 10:45:47 AM PDT by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson