Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: navysealdad
32 posted on
05/11/2010 3:40:44 PM PDT by
Sergio
(If a tree fell on a mime in the forest, would he make a sound?)
To: navysealdad
I'd like to know why the model is considered 'Plus-sized'.
She is beautiful and built like a real woman not like those 'tanorexic' skags you see on reality shows or on most fashion runways.
And BTW, "I'd hit that like she stole something."
33 posted on
05/11/2010 3:40:55 PM PDT by
SantosLHalper
(Eat some bacon.No, I got no idea if it'll make you feel better, I just made too much bacon.")
To: navysealdad
As a completely hetero female, I can say she’s a beautiful woman. Frankly, I see more cleavage jiggling around on Dancing With The Stars on ABC.
To: navysealdad
But they have no problem with Victoria’s Secret Angel underwear commercials???? Give me a break! I thought LB’s was okay.
35 posted on
05/11/2010 3:46:53 PM PDT by
Pilated
To: navysealdad
Mmmmm Mmmmm Mmmmm
36 posted on
05/11/2010 3:51:47 PM PDT by
Tainan
(Cogito, ergo conservatus)
43 posted on
05/11/2010 4:07:08 PM PDT by
Professional Engineer
(Conservative States of America has a nice ring to it.)
To: navysealdad
Voluptuous ... is smoking hot.
50 posted on
05/11/2010 6:45:56 PM PDT by
dartuser
("Palin 2012 ... nothing else will do.")
To: navysealdad
Plus-sized label Lane Bryant says that a commercial for their new Cacique line of lingerie has been rejected by ABCAFOX. The label suggests in a post to their blog that the networks restricted their airtime although they had already agreed to run the commercial. Bryant says the networks had a problem with the cleavage in the ad.
51 posted on
05/11/2010 6:52:26 PM PDT by
Randy Larsen
( BTW, If I offend you! Please let me know, I may want to offend you again!(FR #1690))
To: navysealdad
Plus-sized label Lane Bryant says that a commercial for their new Cacique line of lingerie has been rejected by
ABC and
FOX. The label suggests in a post to their blog that the networks restricted their airtime although they had already agreed to run the commercial. Bryant says the networks had a problem with the cleavage in the ad.
Fixed my mistake!
52 posted on
05/11/2010 6:54:51 PM PDT by
Randy Larsen
( BTW, If I offend you! Please let me know, I may want to offend you again!(FR #1690))
To: navysealdad
L
54 posted on
05/11/2010 7:33:12 PM PDT by
Lurker
(The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson