Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pres. Barack Obama – Editor of the Harvard Law Review – Has No Law License???
Alamo City Pundit ^ | Johnny Alamo

Posted on 10/13/2010 4:09:40 AM PDT by DBCJR

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: DBCJR

Actually, President of HLR - not just editor. From 1990.

http://www.nytimes.com/1990/02/06/us/first-black-elected-to-head-harvard-s-law-review.html?scp=1&sq=butterfield%201990&st=cse

The skill set required for President of HLR is very different from the skill set required for POTUS.


21 posted on 10/13/2010 4:46:36 AM PDT by PeteCat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBCJR

Here’s an article from 2008

Obama provided false information, IL bar application, Bar Complaint filed, Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission, Chicago, Illinois 60601

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/07/24/barack-obama-illinois-bar-application-obama-lied-obama-provided-false-information-il-bar-application-bar-complaint-filed-attorney-registration-and-disciplinary-commission-chicago-illinois-6060/


22 posted on 10/13/2010 4:46:41 AM PDT by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

‘Logical fallacy’ right on cue - back to defend his idols - the Obama’s!


23 posted on 10/13/2010 4:48:47 AM PDT by Free America52 (The White guys are getting pissed off. We beat Hitler Hirohito and Krushchev. Obama will be easy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Free America52
‘Logical fallacy’ right on cue - back to defend his idols - the Obama’s!

Stupidity is stupidity whether it's directed at Obama or at Bush. And wherever there is stupidity can Free America 52 be far behind?

24 posted on 10/13/2010 4:52:29 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Hey mo-joe! Here's another one for your collection.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Both Obama's have law licenses. Both have voluntarily had their licenses put in an inactive status. This is not uncommon for attorneys who are working in positions where they are not practicing law because it means they don't have to keep up with the continuing legal education requirements.

Sounds innocuous enough to you, doesn't it?

But the facts are different. Looks like there was a disciplinary action about to be handed down on Michelle, so she "voluntarily surrendered" her license, which dovetails into the "not-the-whole-truth" narrative you just described.

Then you must ask yourself--why? Why would you surrender a law license only 4 years after obtaining it?Especially when you are in a prestigious Chicago law firm?

It would seem that in the legal profession, that is the equivalent of surfer's wipeout, self induced or not.

Like all of the Obamas' records, the slate has ever been sanitized, as in this "Google" version you posted,or has been wiped clean.

The purpose of which is to obscur, deflect, and obsfucate.

But the truth will come out.

25 posted on 10/13/2010 4:55:05 AM PDT by exit82 (Democrats are the enemy of freedom. Sarah Palin is our Esther.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DBCJR

This is old news. We knew before he was elected that he didn’t have a current law license in Illinois and neither did Michelle. People really should have paid attention BEFORE they voted for him.


26 posted on 10/13/2010 4:58:42 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBCJR
Why is so much about obama hidden? Things that most big ego politicians volunteer freely and with the pride of accomplishment, are off limits with obama. Why?

His story is exactly that: a story told in two books which were likely written by someone else to sell him to the rest of us.

If only a reporter had the cajones to pull on one of the many loose strings, the whole cloth so many couldn't wait to buy will quickly unravel.

When or if the truth is ever revealed, we will see one of the greatest shows on Earth. We've never been lied to like this before...as far as we know...

27 posted on 10/13/2010 4:59:52 AM PDT by GBA (Not on our watch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBCJR

Just a side note—this was discovers and discussed on FR back in 2008.

Nice to see the rest of the country waking up to the anomaly and enigma that is the Obamas.


28 posted on 10/13/2010 5:01:18 AM PDT by exit82 (Democrats are the enemy of freedom. Sarah Palin is our Esther.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free America52

Non-Sequitar has posted nearly an identical comment before when discussing Michelle law license. I am almost sure that he is a bot.


29 posted on 10/13/2010 5:03:54 AM PDT by castlegreyskull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

Michelle clearly did something horrendous to be forced to surrender her license! And especially after on four years since getting it in the first place!
Obozo lost his as well, altough he may have surrendered his because he lied on his application when asked if he had any aliases other than Barack Obama and he filled in the answer “NO!”


30 posted on 10/13/2010 5:03:56 AM PDT by True Republican Patriot (May GOD Continue to BLESS Our Greatest President :George W. Bush!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: exit82
Nice to see the rest of the country waking up to the anomaly and enigma that is the Obamas.

Isn't that racist?

Oh, wait....you said "E"-nigma.

Never mind.

31 posted on 10/13/2010 5:08:58 AM PDT by N. Theknow (Kennedys: Can't skipper a boat, Can't drive, Can't ski, Can't fly. But they KNOW what's best!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

This is one of the subjects that Soros, Rahm, and Axelrod allegedly told the media heads that they better not report on or they’d be harassed out of business - the law license issues.

There’s definitely a story there, but like everything else surrounding Obama he’s hiding behind the laws or the willingness of bureaucrats to break the laws for his (or for Soros’) sake. Just like the Muslim playbook says to do: take over America by exploiting the legal system.


32 posted on 10/13/2010 5:13:17 AM PDT by butterdezillion (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: exit82

You are a little early. It was 2009 when the NRO article was published.


33 posted on 10/13/2010 5:14:16 AM PDT by DBCJR (What would you expect?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: DBCJR

If Alamo gets close to finding any answers, the goon squad will be at his door taking him for reprogramming.

People thought the Clintons were bad, but I think the Zeros have them beat. I would put nothing past this idiot that bigger idiots elected Pres_ent.


34 posted on 10/13/2010 5:16:33 AM PDT by leapfrog0202 ("the American presidency is not supposed to be a journey of personal discovery" Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

If I’m understanding correctly, Barack Obama’s legal career had two accomplishments:

1) he sued to get Motor Voter enforced so people would not have to have documentation in order to be registered to vote; and

2) he pushed banks to make subprime loans by threatening to sue or to hold up their ability to function because of unresolved accusations.

Both items are major planks in the Cloward-Piven (communist) Plan to destroy America - destroying our economy and electoral accountability by compromising the integrity of those critical, foundational pieces of infrastructure.


35 posted on 10/13/2010 5:19:48 AM PDT by butterdezillion (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DBCJR
"simply becuase it’s easier to send the state $49.00 a month than to pay the $200, take a test, wate six weeks, etc., etc"

Seriesly?

36 posted on 10/13/2010 5:25:38 AM PDT by Roos_Girl (The world is full of educated derelicts. - Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

You would say that, you’re only here to defend Obama. Besides that, you’re lying about this subject.
But that’s not unusual, is it.


37 posted on 10/13/2010 5:27:29 AM PDT by Shimmer1 (Think. It isn't illegal yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

He’s behind you!


38 posted on 10/13/2010 5:29:30 AM PDT by Shimmer1 (Think. It isn't illegal yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: shalom aleichem

Here is the answer to the court ordered part of it.
https://www.iardc.org/registration/rule770inactivestatus.html


39 posted on 10/13/2010 5:32:26 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

The President can go back to being a lawyer...

https://www.iardc.org/registration/changeofregstatus_info.html


40 posted on 10/13/2010 5:34:18 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson