Posted on 10/07/2014 7:55:14 AM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
ok
Maybe, but their larger foolery was not in keeping closer watch on German industrial disguise that turned out to be military.
Still if one puts any credence in genes, the Germans had a long dirty history of aggression and today many Germans have a harsh superiority complex.
Who knows, if we had not had a two super power Cold War Germany may have tried again.
I wonder how good Patton would have been in the Pacific theater. He was great fighting the type of war in Europe with all that entails. The Pacific was another beast entirely. Island hopping might not have been his cup of tea.
I agree Americans wouldn't have been thrilled with anothe war.
In terms of casualties they had incurred around 30 million compared to our 400K or so.
Once we re-deployed our forces to Europe and possibly the Middle East, combined with our production, I think we'd take'em.
Glad we don't have the history to prove it one way or the other.
Naval forces are next to useless in a land war in Eurasia, as the Brits bound out in the Crimean War and as the Japanese found out in the Russo-Japanese War.
You're talking to someone who made it a point in two different books to argue that the US played a critical role in saving Russia in winter 1941-42, but that said, there was no way we were going to win a land war with Russia without nukes, which is why ALL our planning called for nukes.
You understate the effort. It took the combine military and industrial power of the United States, the entire British Empire and the Soviet Union to defeat the German Army.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.