Remember when George Bush's ranch got buzzed by a UFO?

American Thinker ^ | Christopher Carson

[HereInTheHeartland]

Many very credible people have seen things that don’t make sense.

[T. P. Pole]

I ponder if it is something like Douglas Adam's "Somebody else's problem" field that prevents the UFO from getting photographed. Like a cloak field in star trek.

I'll have to write down my UFO story one day. 20-30 minute observation of a classic UFO, then suddenly, an IFO. Been a skeptic ever since.

[silverleaf]

LOL!!!

[InterceptPoint]

There are new UFO videos/pics practically daily. Sometimes with several people filming the same UFO or entire formations of UFOs.

The mainstream media ignores them for “some reason” and nobody official investigates. You used to see wild reports all the time in overseas media but not any more.

But YouTube isn't the MSM. Can you give us a link to some of these new UFO videos?

[silverleaf]

agree. personal experience.

I think the problem is, once we acknowledge them...then what? THEN WHAT?

Govt has no answer. Churches have no answer. Our brains have no answer.

As long as they are just twerking around above us, just ignore them, deny them, and therefore defer dealing with them. Go back to bed, forget it.

At least in any publicly acknowledged project

[norwaypinesavage]

" IF some thousand foot long aircraft WAS flying 3,000 mph at 3,500 ft altitude it probably got the attention of everyone in the area."

The sonic booms alone, would flatten all the cedar trees on the ranch.

[WayneS]

You’re probably not far from the truth.

[Romans Nine]

Many things that don’t make sense about very credible people also.

[piasa]

If it was going 2000 mph then it wouldn’t be in the area.

[Springfield Reformer]

That assumes the purported vehicle displaces air in an ordinary manner. But any technology that can move as quickly as these things supposedly do would have to find some innovative way to eliminate atmospheric drag. Which I can’t imagine how it could be done. Of course imaginary objects can travel at the speed of thought, so that’s a possibility too. :)

[varyouga]

There are several uploaded to youtube daily and I don’t have time to look through all of them. Just type “UFO”. Some youtubers pick the “best” and make compilations like “best UFOs of March 2015”, etc. Overseas media used to cover the more extraordinary ones (where entire skies are covered in UFOs) but not any more.

I’m not saying they are extraterrestrials but there are NO DOUBT objects in the sky visible every day we cannot explain. And government completely ignores the issue each time they are presented with huge evidence from multiple people from multiple angles.

I’m a mechanical engineer and private pilot and have seen two(2) personally that did not appear on ATC radar and visually exceeded any known aircraft performance. Supersonic (or even hypersonic) objects lower than 10,000ft that would shatter windows on the ground if it was a known aircraft.

The only way you can really see these “fast ones” is from the cockpit at high altitude and many fellow pilots have. Filming is nearly impossible since they are small, fast and cross the horizon within 1-2 seconds (!). ATC submits these reports to the military when a pilot reports a sighting but of course nothing is heard back. In fact, the only thing they say is “you wont hear back”.

[Boogieman]

Videos and photos are basically worthless evidence now, since anyone with a computer, digital editing software, and a little know how can fake themselves up a UFO video easily.

[Grampa Dave]

Part of the lack of UFO pictures with the smart phones and android tablets is probably two fold:

1. Operator error with those of us, not as smart as our phones/tablets.

2. Different capabilities and limits of the phones/tablets.

#1 is a constant issue.

#2 My tablet takes great outdoor pictures if the outside light is not too dark or too bright. It takes excellent outside photos and terrible indoor pics. It is terrible in low light.

My wife’s android takes great pics inside and not that great
Outside.

However, your question is very valid re lack digital photos of UFOS.

[Boogieman]

Looks like a head on shot of a plane with landing lights on the wingtips to me.

[InterceptPoint]

I took a quick look at some of them. Many are simply zoomed images of flying birds. I think that is pretty common. Others are, of course, harder to explain so I do understand the interest in this stuff.

I was once given a video by my son-in-law of what he thought might be a UFO that was highlighted by his telescope image of the moon. I have to admit that it looked pretty suspicious. So I loaded his video up in my Vegas Pro video editor and slowed the image way, way down. What did I see: fuzzy images of flapping wings. It was enough even for the son-in-law.

[Boogieman]

Unless it had some kind of warp drive, in which case there would be no sonic boom.

[Old Sarge]

The 1000ft figure is closest to the first Enterprise.

“That’s NCC-1701: no bloody A, B, C, or D...”

[mad_as_he$$]

lol...

[WayneS]

Not for very long, at any rate.

[leapfrog0202]

Thanks for that. I had no clue.