Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AP Poll: Negative view of Trump now nears 70 percent
Hotair ^ | 04/07/2016 | John Sexton

Posted on 04/07/2016 7:03:43 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-192 next last
To: Lakeshark
Pretending that polls stay static from the Spring to the Fall in most election cycles.

I never pretended anything of the kind but I will aver that they can reveal trends which can be very predictive. Look at the trend, Trump's negatives are not going from bad to worse they are going from terrible to calamitous.

My objection to anecdotal evidence stands.


121 posted on 04/07/2016 8:19:55 PM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Linda Frances

She went by Red in Brea (or something close to that). She didn’t post a whole lot. But when she posted on a thread why she wasn’t going vote for Trump when the primary came to CA, thats when the foul message came.

She said since she stopped looking at FR (and all other political news) her spirits a way up!

I would like to follow her example. I have only had a FR account for a little less than a year and can’t believe how much the two side are hating each other. But I got to keep up with whats going on. I hate being uninformed....even if it is healthy for me!


122 posted on 04/07/2016 8:20:42 PM PDT by Angels27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Angels27

17 years is pretty good! My mom would not last 17 minutes on FR and she is second cousin to SCOTUS Pierce Butler.


123 posted on 04/07/2016 8:23:15 PM PDT by TauntedTiger (Born in the USA w/ two US citizen parents. I'm a super natural born citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

Anecdotal evidence is worthless.

True, and so are many polls, especially the ones that 1) are comprised of soft questions about feelings, 2) are referring to an event seven months away, 3) are filled with hypotheticals. These factors, combine to make these favorability polls meaningless. Polls that ask “who are you voting for tomorrow” are far more reliable, in part because the pollster has a vested interest in getting it right.

Carson said something interesting when Megan Kelly asked him whether Trump could learn something from Carson’s vastly better likability ratings.
He said [paraphrasing] “True, a lot more people liked me, but they didn’t vote for me. Nobody liked Trump, but they all voted for him (laughing)!


124 posted on 04/07/2016 8:27:18 PM PDT by enumerated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Starstruck

When was the last time you looked at popular vote stats from previous presidential elections? At best you get maybe 60 million voters participating in any one major election. In which election have you seen 250 million voters participating in the popular vote? It has never happened and will never happen.


125 posted on 04/07/2016 8:27:21 PM PDT by 4Runner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce

Okay let’s see if we can make this simple for you. If there are 10,000 people at a Trump rally in a town of say 100,000 people it would appear that he was really popular. However, the facts are that means only 10% of the people in town came to his rally. If you assume some of these people are not from that town, but drove in from other areas to see him then even a smaller percentage in the town like him enough to come to his rally. There might also be people who came because they wanted to see this guy they’ve heard about on TV, after all he is a reality TV star and a billionaire, so cut the percentage a little more. So, pretty soon you might be down to say 7-8%, which means over 92% of the locals don’t really like him all that much.

Bottom line “big” rally crowds don’t mean squat. Sarah Palin had crowds as high as 25,000 here in Indiana back in 2008, and McCain lost the state, a first for a republican since 1964.


126 posted on 04/07/2016 8:27:57 PM PDT by redangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: palmer

You Trumpsters are amazing. Do those rose colored glasses work on other things other than Trump?


127 posted on 04/07/2016 8:30:16 PM PDT by redangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

“I think that’s true enough, but with time the opposite happens and people begin to see the depth of his thought and commitment and seriousness.”

That’s pretty funny. For the last several weeks the depth of his thought and commitment and seriousness has consisted of “Donald Trump is a bad man” and “I’m not Donald Trump”.


128 posted on 04/07/2016 8:31:03 PM PDT by hirn_man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Angels27

Two way Street.

A Cruz Supporter Posted a fake Opus and Damned the Trump Supporters on FR to Hell.

That FReeper is still here today Posting trash against the Trump Supporters. It comes from both sides, period.

Did your Mother forward that particular PM to Jim?
That Poster should have been kicked off FR for that.


129 posted on 04/07/2016 8:32:35 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (It is better to live one day as a lion than one hundred years as a sheep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Mensius

It’s not that simply. Good people, mostly military but some DOD’s, job is to study various scenarios and the worse thing that could happen is more nukes out there. Laugh it you want to, but more nukes is more for the bad guys.


130 posted on 04/07/2016 8:32:51 PM PDT by Linda Frances (Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: rwh

It works both ways. There are many Cruz supporters on FR who are incredibly rude, insulting and hypocritical to the extreme.

They proclaim what perfect Christians they are while, at the same time, damning to Hell anyone who dares to vote for a candidate other than Cruz.

It’s even worse on Twitter. Some of the Cruz supporters are breathtakingly vicious, vile and even perverted. A male Cruz supporter tweeted that he wanted to find naked pics of Ivanka and post them online. I reported the pervert and warned my followers about him.

So you can stop acting the victim. The rudeness and insults go both ways. Personally, if I find a respectful, polite Cruz supporter, I treat them with kindness and respect.

OTOH, if I find a snarky, rude Cruz supporter, I also treat them accordingly.


131 posted on 04/07/2016 8:34:04 PM PDT by CrimsonTidegirl (Proud Islamophobe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
What’s not clear is why Trump’s unfavorable numbers are peaking at this moment.

It is entirely due to those who conduct the polls. Ignore the polls. Vote according to your own decision. The lemming approach is for those who believe media we already know can't be trusted.

132 posted on 04/07/2016 8:36:08 PM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4Runner
When was the last time you looked at popular vote stats from previous presidential elections? At best you get maybe 60 million voters participating in any one major election.

Since the last Presidential election had 127 million voters you are already wrong. So Trump has 6% of the number of people who voted in 2012. That still doesn't make him overwhelmingly popular.

133 posted on 04/07/2016 8:36:16 PM PDT by Starstruck (I'm usually sarcastic. Deal with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford
Polls can do that on occasion, but rarely this far out, and you know that is a true statement.

I stand by what I said as well, If Ted Cruz actually wins this after going in to the convention with less delegates, he will be destroyed in the general. He doesn't have what it takes to handle the heat he will get.

The good news: It's likely that Trump will be the nominee, and we won't get to test out my observation.

134 posted on 04/07/2016 8:37:22 PM PDT by Lakeshark (One time Cruz supporter who now prefers Trump. Yes, there are good reasons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Linda Frances
I served with the son of the lead negotiator of the Salt II negotiations. That's where I met his dad. I've had recent conversations with him.

I'm not laughing anything off. You should know that the only nuclear proliferation is to the bad guys.

135 posted on 04/07/2016 8:38:55 PM PDT by Mensius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th

Rubio supporters. No
Carly supporters. No
Jeb supporters. No
Carson supporters. No
Paul supporters. No
Huckabee supporters. No
Santorum supporters. No


136 posted on 04/07/2016 8:39:04 PM PDT by redangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Rufus Shinra

30% of the republican primary vote not the same thing.


137 posted on 04/07/2016 8:39:50 PM PDT by redangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford
Look at the trend, Trump's negatives are not going from bad to worse they are going from terrible to calamitous.

Yep, by November he will be at least 150% negative.

138 posted on 04/07/2016 8:42:09 PM PDT by palmer (Net "neutrality" = Obama turning the internet over to foreign enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Angels27

Sometimes I have to step back and say God has a plan for our good. The world might be in chaos, but maybe the chaos is to part of Gods plan to wake people up to our real problems. Tell your mom to come back after Ted wins. Give it a month actually.


139 posted on 04/07/2016 8:42:42 PM PDT by Linda Frances (Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Mensius

Then you should know the nightmare our kids will live under with anybody and everybody having nukes. Yes, we’ll nuke the bad guys first, but how the world will change.


140 posted on 04/07/2016 8:46:36 PM PDT by Linda Frances (Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-192 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson