I am a healthcare provider who still uses narrative notes in my private practice, though I have used EMR ( electronic medical records) in other settings. There is no way this is the real deal, either as a written/dictated note for the patient or her chart, or as a print out /synopses from her EMR. The language does not flow, especially in comparison to the actual letter released by her personal physician. Odd usage such as “blacking out” instead of syncope or loss of consciousness, “well fed” instead of well-nourished etc
I personally think there is something pretty seriously wrong with Clinton health-wise, possibly neurological in nature, such as cognitive impairment post her concussion. But this is an obvious forgery, and whoever put it up is more traceable than they realize. And if any of it was lifted from actual medical files the HIPPA fines would be astronomical.
I saw that on Twitter and wondered if it was legit. Someone has set up this Twitter account. If they are to be believed, they worked in the office of the doctor who said that Hillary is medically fine. They say there is more to come.
If these are real, this person is in big trouble because this is a violation of HIPPA laws, although this person acknowledges he/she is breaking the law.
Anyone think to ask Doc Carson about this. Isn’t he one of the top people in the US if not the world on this kind of issue?
If I am leaking somebody's medical records, I'd leave those items in. After all, they are essential to validating the records.
On the other hand, if I'm an ass making stuff up, I'd settle for redaction. If I don't redact, then I have to make up values, which will be quickly exposed as false. On the other hand, if I redact, then the sheeple will nod (such of them as actually look at records, redacted or not, valid or not), having been conditioned by court-ordered or FOIA disclosures.
It is easy enough to generate a Word document with a letterhead containing the name and address of a real physician. Someone with a little bit of medical knowledge could pull a diagnosis off of WebMD and then write up a narrative of a patient presenting with symptoms.
What makes it superficially believable is that Hillary does display symptoms of something, so when someone describes a condition that has those symptoms, it seems plausible. But plausibility does not make it genuine.
I’m afraid that whatever is going on with Hillary’s health, we are not going to know about it. Medical records are protected by HIPAA. If that image were of a real doctor’s report, that doctor would lose her license and possibly face jail time for publicizing patient data. (Or she would suddenly suffer suicidal depression, given the Clinton crime family involvement.)
One final thing: the left is pushing this meme that Trump is “dangerous.” I think it is to distract us from the fact that whatever Hillary’s medical condition is, she is extremely volatile. And she has already caused massive mayhem in the Middle East.
Well, that Twitter page is now gone. Whatever that means.