Posted on 10/12/2016 8:26:34 PM PDT by EinNYC
is it possible that it was a rerun?....IIRC, Levin is Jewish, and perhaps he was at services...
I always found him a little too angry and nasty for my liking. When he started bashing Trump I crossed him off my list. At least Rush’s egomania is entertaining in small doses.
I used to prefer Levin altogether but since Trump’s candidacy his whole tone and demeanor have changed. He and Glenn Beck seem to be psychological casualties of this campaign.
Who the frug cares? Lose the self indulgent disclaimer and join the side you're on.
Because he’s an idiot who thinks Cubanadians are eligible to be President.
Cheeto dust intoxication. He caught it from Beck.
2 Peas in a pod.
Rush almost went there. He had a tad more sense.
ie. If you are going to shoot the king you had better kill the king.
Mark has no sense. Smart idiot.
He profits on controversy like all presstitutes. Nothing more or less . All journalist suck the same sugar tit as actors promoting said sugar tits agenda. He’s a bought and paid for political parrot.
BTW.... When a presstitute becomes the news it isn’t news.
Just my own free for all opinion.
He doesn’t “smear” Trump but he obviously doesn’t like him. He should not talk about Trump, just hold his peace until after the election, and continue to talk about the subjects in which he is knowledgeable and wise. He is a true authority on the Constitution and the Declaration, for instance.
“Why is Mark Levin still smearing Trump at every opportunity?”
—Question for all: has Levin been on Hannity lately? Last time I remember him on was during the birth-right citizenship debate over illegals
He is an ignorant ass and has showed his true colors. Like it or not, Trump or Hillary will be the next president. if you hurt one, you help the other.
Screw GOPe Levin, he works for Hillary.
If he is such an authority on the Constitution, then he would or should have known that Ted Cruz isn’t eligible now or ever to be president. Levin is living in the 80’s. Reagan was a good president, but, like the others, had his flaws. I guess it’s easy to canonize someone you admire and overlook their faults. And, Reagan did some things that weren’t so great.
Levin is mad because Trump is doing what Levin has been advocating for years — bringing about a new Republican party.
Levin is mad because Trump didn’t call his radio program after Levin started dissing Trump just before the Iowa caucus.
Levin is mad became his selectee (familial connections with Levin’s girlfriend) didn’t get close to earning the nomination.
No, Rush went there. Anyone who went there for even a second of airtime after Trump won the nomination, their careers are over. The bloated oxycontin-laiden fraud has been exposed as a kabuki party supporter. Has he told us when to panic yet? /s
1. Levin is a jerk
2. Levin too has corporate masters to bow to i.e. establishment toadie
Levin is a free trader NWO type that doesn’t care about immigration or offshoring. He hates Trump for his pro America economic agenda.
Mark lost me when, even after affirmation that CRUZ was NOT a NBC, he was STILL protecting Cruz’ corner. That told all one needed to know about ML. Never again. RUSH and MARK? The masks are off and now the gloves as well. Pious elites, every damn one of them.
Mark lost me when, even after affirmation that CRUZ was NOT a NBC, he was STILL protecting Cruz’ corner. That told all one needed to know about ML. Never again. RUSH and MARK? The masks are off and now the gloves as well. Pious elites, every damn one of them.
I remember once Rush Limbaugh made a statement (and I understood where he was coming from). It was a response to a statement some made after the democrat gained control of the White House which implied that Rush Limbaugh Show’s in trouble now that a republican’s no longer in the WH. Who will listen?
Rush said his ratings grew more and the shows revenue up after Bill Clinton took office.
Now, some people like Rush Limbaugh are more authentic than others and really believe what they say from the heart and really hope the liberal does not win the election despite the fact that it could be of financial benefit if the opposition did win.
Other talkers may have other objectives
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.