Posted on 01/29/2018 4:44:45 AM PST by ransomnote
ThanQ.
Which vloggers do you consider solid?
We’ve been having this disagreement for a week now, so let me try to understand your opinion better.
What do you believe will happen if/when the 4 page memo is released?
Do you believe having the public read the memo will make it more or less likely that senior figures of the US government prior to January 20, 2017 will be indicted, tried, convicted, and imprisoned?
I believe it is less likely - much less, in fact. If you believe it is more likely, can you tell me why?
What will the effect of the memo on the 65 million or so voters who chose Hillary?
What will the effect of the memo be on the 63 million or so voters who chose Trump?
Will making the contents of this memo an intense partisan issue (which will happen) make successful prosecution more or less likely?
I have no basis to have an opinion on that. I don't follow any of them. The one in the OP, based on my "fact checking," I would consider as probably well intended, but careless and ignorant. I wouldn't stop watching, if I was. But I would not trust the reasoning or conclusions. As I said, the junk peddlers often cite to material that I would not otherwise view. By way of example, the phony Maxine Waters letter.
When the point is important enough, I also review the evidence with sources I don't consider to be junk, but consider generally trustworthy, such as Hannity, Levin, Ingraham, Trump, and Limbaugh.
I am amazed at the degree of false and ill-informed belief. Among the general public, there is a nearly complete absence of well-informed belief. Sad.
Sounds like you were shadow banned.
PRAYING FOR OUR PRESIDENT TRUMP (DEFENDER OF ISRAEL), His Family, His Administration, AND OUR NATION.
THE TRUTH SHALL SET US FREE
DRAIN THE SWAMP = MAGA!
LOL!!!
Could not have said it better, myself!!!
Go to YOUTUBE and watch some Mark Dice videos of him asking questions of random people on the street....It's pathetic.
Have you watched the interview of Joe diGenova that was posted here by the site owner several days ago? It is about the 99-page document mentioned in this article and is worth every single minute spent.
I read one thread here that stated 165 House Republicans have called for the release. If so, that is a hellovalot more than a handful.
You are one of the very few I have seen that understand this. Also, PDJT has already ordered a reversal of this policy.
We believe that God will deal very sternly with folks who try and hinder disclosure of the memo and supporting evidence.
That will include Twitter execs.
LET GOD ARISE AND HIS ENEMIES BE SCATTERED!
Contact congress traitors--let them know the outrage in the rank and file if they do not support disclosure.
Bkmk
Why not take them at their word on that given that they are responsible for the memo?
____________
lol
It’s not just that the People “deserve” to know, the People have a responsibility to know. The fact that there is a question about releasing the documents is in itself swampish.
#ReleaseThe DamnMemo!
Because the (99 page) document that is being referred to is a FISC Court Order released April 2017 and then declassified + redacted last year and then published for all to see last year on the DNI's web site ... it just takes time for people to catch on. Yet you post here that don't know that? WHY? ROFLMAO ;)
*
What do you believe will happen if/when the 4 page memo is released?
Democrats and the media will have a harder time denying the corrupition of the FBI and DOJ and hopefully even tying it to Cankbama. They will switch their efforts to protecting Cankbama and try to isolate the damage to the FBI/DOJ.
Do you believe having the public read the memo will make it more or less likely that senior figures of the US government prior to January 20, 2017 will be indicted, tried, convicted, and imprisoned?
Yes. If we can succeed in making it clear that those officials were the corrupting influence of FBI/DOJ. This memo will make a more aware public and public support is crucial. Hence, Q and the memo.
I believe it is less likely - much less, in fact. If you believe it is more likely, can you tell me why?
That is crazy talk. Any rise in public awareness of corruption can only increase the likelihood that proper action can and will be taken. How can you possibly think otherwise. Please justify your failure of logic.
What will the effect of the memo on the 65 million or so voters who chose Hillary?
Some will be "red pilled". Most likely, those who are ignorant of events and fell for her bullshit. Some, who tolerate anything for the cause, will remain unchanged. I cannot speculate on the percentages.
What will the effect of the memo be on the 63 million or so voters who chose Trump?
We will become even more pissed off at what Cankbama and others have done to corrupt our government. We will get louder and our support for The Donald will increase.
Will making the contents of this memo an intense partisan issue (which will happen) make successful prosecution more or less likely
The memo is already an "intense partisan issue." The entire ongoing war is. The release of the memo weakens the enemy and strengthens our side. Silencing some partisans on their side and bringing more to our side. It will free the cowards on our side to speak out and silence those who wish to save themselves.
There is no downside to releasing the memo. None.
Diane Feinstein and Adam Schiff wrote a letter dated January 23, 2018 to Mark Zuckerberg (CEO ,Chairman: Facebook) and Jack Dorsey (CEO:Twitter) asking them to shutdown accounts using the hashtag #RELEASE THE MEMO! Users report having their Facebook and Twitter accounts shut down as a result... This is in addition to the suppression of conservative speech through Twitter's use of "shadow banning." Twitter let's users see their own Tweets (posts) but hides the fact that only the person who posts them can see them. Lack of public response to conservative ideas and content (because the public can't see them) discourages further efforts to communicate such views. Jame's O'Keefe exposed this practice in a series of videos including some footage of CEO Jack Dorsey himself admitting that Twitter is censoring conservatives views only.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.