Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CHURCHILL was a WAR CRIMINAL - BBC historian David Olusoga in astonishing attack
the Express UK ^ | March 20, 2018 | CIARAN MCGRATH

Posted on 03/30/2018 6:11:49 AM PDT by granada

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: tx_eggman

More likely, he wouldn’t exist at all, his parents having been eradicated during a world wide purge.


21 posted on 03/30/2018 7:00:35 AM PDT by jmcenanly ("The more corrupt the state, the more laws." Tacitus, Publius Cornelius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tx_eggman
Without Churchill this idiot would be speaking German.

Reminds me...

Why did the French plant trees along the Champs-Élysées?

So that the Germans could march in the shade!

22 posted on 03/30/2018 7:03:26 AM PDT by IncPen ("Inside of every progressive is a Totalitarian screaming to get out" ~ David Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

One thing that has always puzzled me was how he lost re-election after he had just lead GB through WW2. Amazing actually.


23 posted on 03/30/2018 7:05:26 AM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: granada

India and the Indian Army were responsible for addressing famine relief.

Idiots.


24 posted on 03/30/2018 7:23:05 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xp38

Timeless. Sir Winston Churchill is the type of leader that comes around every 1000 years.


25 posted on 03/30/2018 7:24:37 AM PDT by wjcsux (The hyperventilating of the left means we are winning! (Tagline courtesy of Laz.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

Not amazing, really.
Churchill was the compromise candidate when he became prime minister. He deviated greatly from what had been happening before the war and drove the British Commonwealth mercilessly to win the war. Churchill was heroic, but he was not that popular.
At the end of the war, before it was even over really, the Brits simply resumed their pre-war priorities and elected Labour which put forth Attlee for PM.
The UK did NOT get into its current state overnight. They have been working on it since the 1920s.


26 posted on 03/30/2018 7:26:54 AM PDT by Little Ray (Freedom Before Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: granada

David Olusoga

Born: Lagos, Nigeria


27 posted on 03/30/2018 7:28:47 AM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: granada

It’s only a matter of time before Britain treats Churchill, as if he was Jefferson Davis.


28 posted on 03/30/2018 7:29:39 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: granada

Olusoga channels the jug-eared jackass.


29 posted on 03/30/2018 7:30:03 AM PDT by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tx_eggman

Look him up.

He is Nigerian.


30 posted on 03/30/2018 7:30:55 AM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Churchill was a strong advocate of restricting immigration from the nonwhite former colonies of the British Empire. Had it not been for his leadership in World War II, he would have been as much a pariah as Enoch Powell became for his "rivers of blood" speech.

For examples of some of Churchill's views, check out http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com/2010/02/keep-britain-white-said-winston.html

31 posted on 03/30/2018 7:42:52 AM PDT by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

Probably Churchill would have answered him, “yes I was the worst war criminal, except for all the others”.

I truly despise these one sided, bitter, ungrateful, revisionists who in the name of “historical accuracy” present and emphasize only the worst of a person, ignoring the much greater good they’ve done, and judging them according to current mores. He’s a Nigerian, not a British, perhaps he could tell us a bit about the atrocities his wonderful country has and is committing.

Howard Zinn happens to be another one of this ilk.


32 posted on 03/30/2018 7:44:48 AM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn

He is a part African making his dissertation work for him.


33 posted on 03/30/2018 7:56:32 AM PDT by Chickensoup (Leftists today are speaking as if they plan to commence to commit genocide against conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

He is mixed, Nigerian and white.

Doesn’t like the white part though.


34 posted on 03/30/2018 7:58:06 AM PDT by Chickensoup (Leftists today are speaking as if they plan to commence to commit genocide against conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup
He is mixed, Nigerian and white. Doesn’t like the white part though.

It's the mixed ones that are the worst.

35 posted on 03/30/2018 8:01:10 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

good post, and let’s add MLK to your list.........


36 posted on 03/30/2018 8:05:46 AM PDT by Cen-Tejas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cen-Tejas

Okay. I am always in favor of seeking out additional historical information so as to provide a balanced picture of historical figures.


37 posted on 03/30/2018 8:13:00 AM PDT by WayneS (An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. - Winston Churchill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

Thanks for the info yet I cannot imagine tossing the guy who just led country through the war. As you say GB was on the march downward since the 20’s.


38 posted on 03/30/2018 8:14:00 AM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: granada
I have nothing but admiration for Winston Churchill.

Just recently, I was reading about Operation Catapult (July 1940), which was when the British seized or destroyed much of the French fleet after the surrender of France. Churchill had brass balls to try and pull that off against an ally and I doubt any other British leader at the time would have attempted to do so. Taking this move kept the French fleet out of German hands and helped ensure that the British Navy would continue to rule the seas.

Remember, this was a time when England was all alone against the German colossus. The United States was still over a year from even entering the war. Churchill almost single-handedly held off the Nazis from dominating all of Europe during that 1940-42 period.

World War 2 had plenty of war criminals. Churchill was decidedly not one of them.

39 posted on 03/30/2018 8:24:28 AM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spok
Revising history to fit an agenda. No credibility.

There's a lot of that going around.

40 posted on 03/30/2018 8:25:02 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson