Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Book That Incited a Worldwide Fear of Overpopulation
Smithsonian Magazine ^ | January 2018 | Charles C. Mann

Posted on 04/02/2018 7:21:41 AM PDT by C19fan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: C19fan

Norman Borlaug. We all should know his name and celebrate his achievements, as he is almost single-handedly the reason why the Population Bomb did not go off.


41 posted on 04/02/2018 8:55:07 AM PDT by Remole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
I too remember Ehrlich’s book coming out in my college days and quickly followed the zero population growth movement...another hysteria induced reaction to a non existent problem. It seems that no one learns from history. These wild haired prognosticators predicting doom and gloom have been with us since the days of Malthus and have never been right.

The global warming hoax however is more insidious as it is a politically motivated vehicle for greater government control and world governance by a handful of elites. Man caused global warming a.k.a climate change, has now become a cult with an unquestionable dogma, an Inquisition to root out “deniers” and its own Savonarola, Al Gore. I pray the world comes to its senses and exposes these charlatans.

42 posted on 04/02/2018 8:56:38 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("Socialists are happy until they run out of other people's money." Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
the book promised, “hundreds of millions of people are going to starve to death.” No matter what people do, “nothing can prevent a substantial increase in the world death rate.”

The beliefs of Ehrlich and Malthus are valid only for stagnant or retrogressing economy that is the result of leftardism or a non division of labor economy

43 posted on 04/02/2018 8:58:23 AM PDT by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

We had one of those stupid machines at our school too


44 posted on 04/02/2018 8:59:41 AM PDT by BRL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

It sold lots of copies because college students across the country were forced to buy it by their professors. I was one of them.


45 posted on 04/02/2018 9:03:36 AM PDT by redangus (actually hit her?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

It convinced a lot of white, college educated women to forego motherhood or at least do replacement only. The push for abortion just ‘happened’ to coincide with the release of the book.


46 posted on 04/02/2018 9:09:49 AM PDT by redangus (actually hit her?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
"If that's the best job you can find, why are you complaining?"

I was working with a Pakistani fellow back when Kathie Lee Gifford got into her big kerfluffle about sweatshops making her fashion line.

His take was interesting. He said "I hope this does not cause them to shut down. I have a cousin who works there, and its the best job she has ever had."


47 posted on 04/02/2018 9:50:36 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

That’s true all over. In Indonesia, the basic job was harvesting sugar cane, or some such thing. Back breaking work. High risk of injury. Awful pay.

Then Nike opened up modern, air-conditioned factories and paid people the princely sum of $5 a day, or something to make sneakers. Indonesians were thrilled! Best job they ever had!

Meanwhile, Liberals in the US tried to shut them down because $5 a day is insulting.


48 posted on 04/02/2018 9:54:51 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (I'm still somewhat onboard but very disappointed. Not so much "Winning" lately.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: montag813

that chart certainly has pretty colors, but constant tribal war, greedy, corrupt and ineffective governments, lack of infrastructure, lack of potable water, inability for food self-sufficiency, disease, ignorance, apathy, lethargy and much more will guarantee that population growth curve never happens in Africa ...


49 posted on 04/02/2018 10:19:38 AM PDT by catnipman ( Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
No matter what people do, “nothing can prevent a substantial increase in the world death rate.”

True. More people = more people dying. Red herring.

50 posted on 04/02/2018 10:23:14 AM PDT by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

An exponential population growth curve doesn’t hold together unless nutrition, medical intervention, and especially sanitation improve accordingly. More population pressure results in expansion of contact with wildlife harboring microbes. Many animal species are carriers of hemorrhagic fevers as an example.

It’s reasonable to take the position that there are disease vectors we have had no encounters with as yet. An increase in population density results in an out-sized likelihood of finding something nasty which results in a pandemic outbreak, one which will check growth of a population.


51 posted on 04/02/2018 11:05:57 AM PDT by Ozark Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: fuzzylogic

Agricultural robots will replace hand picking of fruits and other agricultural products.


52 posted on 04/02/2018 11:13:29 AM PDT by Ozark Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

I remember sitting in a special presentation at High School in the early 70’s [Class of 72’] and heard the overpopulation propaganda complete with this song:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yK3oWQfb_2M

They pushed the “we’re all going to starve” on us hard all through High School. When I went to my 30th HS Reunion, approximately half of my class had produced -0- children, and those who did have kids typically had only one.

Now the liberals complain that:
1) Americans are having too many children;
2) We need to import illegals because Americans aren’t having enough children; and,
3) The contradictory statements above appear to be coming out of both sides of their mouths at the same time!!!


53 posted on 04/02/2018 11:21:27 AM PDT by LTC.Ret
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
Ehrlich not dead yet. Turns 86 in May.

I'm really surprised he hasn't starved yet.

54 posted on 04/02/2018 11:23:45 AM PDT by Theophilus (Repent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

A FYI: There are chemical and biological agents developed for population control of mammalian species, which work by inducing different degrees of sterility in both sexes for various periods of time. Results depend on which approach is chosen.

These materials have specific handling precautions, as humans are also affected if exposed. The materials are fairly specific in action, as they tend not to greatly disrupt other biological processes linked to behavior. The relevant question is whether these agents have ever been purposely employed within a human population. The adherents of the Club of Rome sometimes advocate extreme actions in support of goals.


55 posted on 04/02/2018 11:47:04 AM PDT by Ozark Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: minnesota_bound
You can put the entire Earth’s population in the space of Texas.

Texas doesn't want 'em.

56 posted on 04/02/2018 11:53:50 AM PDT by Sirius Lee (In God We Trust, In Trump We MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: volunbeer

“Technology, not government intervention, will make the problems of today the products/services of tomorrow. That is a fact. The explosion of new technology grows at an ever increasing rate in every field - materials, energy, agriculture, health, computers, etc etc.

The future is bright if we allow freedom and capitalism to prevail.”

So True.

Remember ‘Peak Oil’?

Totally reasonable prediction based on the extraction technology available at the time.


57 posted on 04/02/2018 4:04:34 PM PDT by JPJones (More tariffs, less income tax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
Yeah, I always turn to an entomologist and Malthusian nitwit for information about the future, about human population growth, about agriculture, and even about metals futures.
Thanks C19fan.

58 posted on 04/02/2018 4:40:13 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CondorFlight

I find it ironic that a solution to overpopulation appeared while Malthus was alive. All you have to do is educate girls, and they won’t want to spend the best years of their lives barefoot and pregnant. Also, he didn’t see how industrialization would make people less eager to raise large families.


59 posted on 04/02/2018 6:46:31 PM PDT by Berosus (I wish I had as much faith in God as liberals have in government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson