Skip to comments.
Shroud of Turin Bloodstains Likely Fake, Not of Jesus Christ: Forensic Experts
Christian Post ^
| 07/17/2018
| Stoyan Zaimov
Posted on 07/17/2018 7:55:40 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
To: SeekAndFind
Shocked. Yes. I’m shocked.
2
posted on
07/17/2018 7:57:56 AM PDT
by
cuban leaf
(The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
To: SeekAndFind
Well I guess that settles it. They ‘might not be’ ...
3
posted on
07/17/2018 7:58:59 AM PDT
by
Mr. K
(No consequence of repealing Obamacare is worse than Obamacare itself.)
To: SeekAndFind
The 13th century forgers could not have predicted the forensics technology of the 21st century.
To: SeekAndFind
Meh, I never put any stock into that thing anyways.
5
posted on
07/17/2018 8:00:54 AM PDT
by
VaeVictis
(~Woe to the Conquered~)
To: SeekAndFind
To bad the original scientists that actually were given hands on access to the shroud disagree. Plenty of youtube videos of thoe few still living discussing this.
6
posted on
07/17/2018 8:02:16 AM PDT
by
Dogbert41
(When the strong man, fully armed, guards his own dwelling, his goods are safe. -Luke 11:21y)
To: SeekAndFind
Dumb. Jesus was taken down from the cross. Why would anyone expect he was laid flat on the ground, and not wrapped in the shroud as he was taken down from the cross? What the researcher means is “the blood flows don’t match the way I wrapped him.”
7
posted on
07/17/2018 8:02:30 AM PDT
by
dangus
To: SeekAndFind
To: SeekAndFind
The Shroud of Turin, as with any holy relic, is supposed to facilitate the Christian’s interaction with God. Its contemplation can help one contemplate the suffering of Jesus Christ, who died for our sins.
9
posted on
07/17/2018 8:05:03 AM PDT
by
karnage
To: Blue House Sue
The 13th century forgers could not have predicted the forensics technology of the 21st century.And so...? That means that...?
Regards,
10
posted on
07/17/2018 8:06:59 AM PDT
by
alexander_busek
(Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
To: SeekAndFind
"This isn't the Middle Ages anymore."I didn't expect a kind of Middle Ages.
11
posted on
07/17/2018 8:07:01 AM PDT
by
MUDDOG
To: Blue House Sue
12
posted on
07/17/2018 8:12:47 AM PDT
by
wally_bert
(Just call me Angelo or babe.)
To: SeekAndFind
And we know His blood type just how??
13
posted on
07/17/2018 8:22:00 AM PDT
by
ealgeone
To: karnage
The Shroud of Turin, as with any holy relic, is supposed to facilitate the Christians interaction with God. Its contemplation can help one contemplate the suffering of Jesus Christ, who died for our sins. Why not read His Word giving the account of His "trial", the beatings, the crucifixion....or pray to Him?
14
posted on
07/17/2018 8:24:32 AM PDT
by
ealgeone
To: SeekAndFind
A big HOWEVER the headline misses:
Jonathyn Priest of Bevel, Gardner and Associates Inc. in Norman, Oklahoma, who is a bloodstain pattern expert, said that while the science and the methodology used in the study were sound, they may not be accounting for when the body was moved such as being carried and prepared for burial.
Priest also told BuzzFeed that the amount of blood from the wrists on the shroud would "more than likely" have needed the heart to have been beating at the time the bloodflow formed, however.
15
posted on
07/17/2018 8:25:53 AM PDT
by
georgiegirl
(Count me Deplorable)
To: SeekAndFind
Everytime these scientists try to prove the shroud fake the opposite happens.
16
posted on
07/17/2018 8:33:10 AM PDT
by
longfellow
(Bill Maher, the 21st hijacker.)
To: alexander_busek
“And so...? That means that...?”
It means that science and technology will uncover forgeries.
To: MUDDOG
18
posted on
07/17/2018 8:48:34 AM PDT
by
onedoug
To: longfellow
Everytime these scientists try to prove the shroud fake the opposite happens.
They have to try to prove the shroud is fake because the only one who can prove it's real is Christ.
19
posted on
07/17/2018 8:56:15 AM PDT
by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
To: SeekAndFind
The Sudarium of Oviedo:
www.shroud.com/guscin.htm
Is the matching facecloth John describes in his account of the crucifixion. Its known to have been in existence since around 1200AD. The blood stains on the face cloth match up with the Shroud.
Note the article references the 1988 (flawed) carbon test where the swatch taken for testing came from a corner repaired from the fire that almost destroyed the Shroud in the 1500’s.
Not everyone knows about the “botched” carbon testing because naturally “fake news” ignores any news that conflicts with their story line.
The only question I would have for the authors of this piece is who funded the “study”. Obviously they started off with an agenda (since they ignore other streams of evidence) and wrote the article with the purpose of calling it a fake.
20
posted on
07/17/2018 9:00:20 AM PDT
by
overdog2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson