The Ignorant Incoherence of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (Long)

https://www.rushlimbaugh.com ^ | Jul 30, 2018 | RUSH

[heterosupremacist]

Vendome wrote:

1st off. I think she is very atrractive

She looks like me with a wig! Why do guys think she looks hot?

[heterosupremacist]

Stevenc131 wrote:

She’s an airhead and she will embarrass the Dem party. I will say however she’s something of a looker.

Typo, we know you meant ‘hooker’...

[oldvirginian]

“Typo, we know you meant ‘hooker’...”

More than a passing resemblance to the Lot Lizards that roam the truck stops.
The Lot Lizards probably have higher morals and a higher IQ.

[heterosupremacist]

butlerweave wrote:

**She won a Primary with a very low voter turnout and she thinks about to be Crowned President, LOL**

President? Or, Ruler of the Cosmos? This hoochie is so delusional!

Even if she wins election in New York’s 14th congressional District, she will only represent voters in that District, and NOT have the power to enforce her stupidity on thinking Americans!

Following her win, Ocasio-Cortez explained her campaign strategy:

“I knew that if we were going to win, the way that progressives win on an unapologetic message is by expanding the electorate. That’s the only way that we can win strategically. It’s not by rushing to the center. It’s not by trying to win spending all of our energy winning over those who have other opinions. It’s by expanding the electorate, speaking to those that feel disenchanted, dejected, cynical about our politics, and letting them know that we’re fighting for them.”

HillarySpeak, horsehockey! Are voters really that dumb?

[jagusafr]

“Ladies and gentlemen, this is wandering aimlessly through our vocabulary in dire search of coherence.”

I smell a bumper sticker...

[Intolerant in NJ]

...but raise our — our corporate tax rate to 28%, which is not even as high as it was before...right - it was about 10% higher than even that proposed 28%, and it wasn't raising anything like 2 trillion dollars - even closing "loopholes", whatever they are, and making the rich pay their "fair share", hard to imagine what that would be since the rich already pay 78% of all personal taxes paid, wouldn't raise that much - and in a matter of a few years all investment dollars would be soaked up and the country on the way to bankruptcy......

[CaliforniaCraftBeer]

[Chode]

AlOCo...

[Vendome]

Hey, I qualified her looks.

Anyway, are you hot?

LOL

[The Great RJ]

Her economics degree obviously did not include any discussion of the Laffer Curve or Hauser’s Law and may well have been filled with Marxist economics with no mention of Hayek, von Mises or Friedman. I taught college economics for more than a decade and she most certainly would have failed my classes.