Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fox News’ Chris Wallace calls Dr. Ford’s testimony ‘a disaster for the Republicans,’ [tr]
Twitchy ^ | September 27, 2018 | Greg P.

Posted on 09/27/2018 9:09:26 AM PDT by C19fan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 last
To: C19fan

Chris Wallace is a democrat. Why fox has him, dunno.


101 posted on 09/27/2018 10:48:10 AM PDT by Basket_of_Deplorables (Q: Believing Is Seeing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Maybe he’s not Mike Wallace’s son


102 posted on 09/27/2018 10:56:37 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan; All
"Fox News’ Chris Wallace thinks the just concluded first part of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s testimony was a “disaster” for the GOP:"

It wouldn’t surprise me if Wallace had at least outlined his negative conclusion about GOP concerning Ford’s testimony before today.

103 posted on 09/27/2018 11:12:46 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

There is reason he’s a Talking Head and not a Lawyer


104 posted on 09/27/2018 11:14:08 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
There are different styles of cross-examination which you adopt based on the type of hearing. For instance, if it is a jury trial, your cross will be more theatrical and to the point, because jurors don't always dig deeply into the testimony, but often just listen for take-a-ways. If it is a bench trial, and particularly before an experienced judge, you are going to be far more methodical, as you know the judge is taking notes and looking for patterns. If you are the prosecution in a bench trial, you are typically even more subdued, because you are only trying to give the judge the facts as clearly, if not as blandly, as possible.

I think that is what we are seeing here. So little as I have heard of the hired prosecutor's cross, she is proceeding as if she is before an experienced judge who usually rules on facts almost mechanically, and is often prejudiced in favor of the prosecution. This sort of record looks good in a cold transcript, but lacks the emotional punch that the public was perhaps expecting.

105 posted on 09/27/2018 11:19:14 AM PDT by PUGACHEV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: vette6387

His father, the utterly reprehensible Mike Wallace, said he (Mike Wallace) was a journalist before he was an American. The acorn doesn’t fall far from the tree.


106 posted on 09/27/2018 11:26:32 AM PDT by ought-six (Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RWGinger

by “her” I meant Chrissy Wallace.


107 posted on 09/27/2018 2:59:36 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Anyone watching her testimony realizes that she has no witnesses to colloberate her story, Kavanaugh does. Chris Wallace did not watch what we all watched.


108 posted on 09/27/2018 3:34:06 PM PDT by maxwellsmart_agent (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson