Posted on 11/12/2018 4:19:29 AM PST by BenLurkin
Cruise missiles and drones could use this.
Especially cruise missiles and drones for which weight, power and size (and cooling) are not considerations.
Cruise missiles originally used terrain mapping, drones are more of less the same. You can supplement terrain mapping with inertial navigation using conventional accelerometers, and I am sure that they already do.
If you need an accelerometer to navigate a train, you’re on the wrong track, Casey Jones.
It sounded interesting, but I was thinking it would have been through quantum entanglement. Then I thought about the measurement paradox and realized I am not a quantum physicist.
Accelerometer navigation would be next to worthless without major computational power, and the device is hardly portable, so this seems to be a solution that is as complicated and fallible as the GPS system it is intended to replace.
What you said.
Lots of application.
The first model has just been demonstrated in the lab.
It will likely shrink down, but it does require high power.
Minature accelerometers have been used for decades already.
They fill in the gaps from GPS for smart weapons.
This one is so potentially accurate and reliable, it would not need the GPS.
The whole point of the device is to be portable.
It just is not as portable as we would like it for most applications, yet.
The first GPS units were much bigger, and took more power than the current ones.
Inertial navigation was used long before GPS.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertial_navigation_system
Trains?
Unless, of course, you wat to make sure there's not another train on the same track or siding. Have you ever seen an overpass for trains, like you see for automobiles?
BTTT
Okay but what’s wrong with GPS? Beleive me if the satellites are taken out the navigation app on your phone will be the least of your problems.
Okay but what’s wrong with GPS? Beleive me if the satellites are taken out the navigation app on your phone will be the least of your problems.
Anchor Crankers rejoice!
Inertial navigation was used successfully long before GPS.
Inertial was compact enough, and accurate enough for Navy aircraft, such as the P-3 Orion, many years ago.
I remember working on the "Carousel IV" in the 70s, for commercial aviation. The accelerometers were mounted on a rotating platform, a carousel, to improve the accuracy. By rotating, the errors in the acceleration signal would somewhat cancel out. The device was a bit larger than the micromachined accelerometer chips in your cell phone.
The developers were quite proud that the device allowed an airplane to fly from Europe to LA, and only miss the airport by a mile, or so.
Sounds like a Inertial Navigation System. I use to work on the old version of a INS back in the 80s. This would be a Quantum Inertial Navigation system.
Before GPS, a lot of Aircraft systems used INS for navigation.
The first units weight about 40 pounds, at least the ones I work on. Big black box.... The antennas were huge too.
That is pretty darn good!
As good as most celestial navigation on ships.
Thanks for that.
Some folks gotta get out more.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.