Part of our thread's resource table is shown below. We've collected links to videos, Q drops, analysts, memes, archives etc. which we find most useful. The table will be expanding to include hearing transcripts and content specific to key players (Obama, Clinton, etc.). Special thanks to Bagster for agreeing to house the full resource table on his FR profile page. You may also view the table by clicking on his name below one of his posts.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
To: ransomnote
That last thread couldn’t die soon enough. Thanks, MoD.
Now, where did that rascal Q go off to?
57 posted on
04/16/2019 1:13:03 PM PDT by
Defiant
(I may be deplorable, but I'm not getting in that basket.)
To: ransomnote
To: ransomnote
Shortened table is a clever solution. Well done!
82 posted on
04/16/2019 2:03:21 PM PDT by
mairdie
(http://www.iment.com/maida/family/father/catharineburnett/hotshots.htm)
To: ransomnote
in after 100 woo-hoo
75 degrees today...golf weather... so aint nobody got time for this
101 posted on
04/16/2019 2:43:24 PM PDT by
stylin19a
(2016 - Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
To: ransomnote
Late but here, thank you Ransomnote!
WW G1WGA
128 posted on
04/16/2019 4:14:16 PM PDT by
StormFlag
(Even in the mud and scum of things, something always, always sings. Ralph Waldo Emerson)
To: ransomnote; All
Posting blind and behind to get the Army General's message
into the new thread.
POTUS doesn't seem worried about Q.
He could stop the entire Q phenom in 30 sec. of his time.
Or use it.
For “Q” to be a legal op, and what we all wish,
I suspect it may have gone something like this...
(40,000 foot meeting with the President)
Mr. President, we have a plan for part of our operations
in the Human Social Communications Domain of the battle
sphere. Here are the notes on our legal footing and
boundaries for it, and I'm here to discuss the broad
outlines with you, in the hope of securing your approval
for this particular mission.
Should you approve this mission, it will necessarily be
highly compartmentalized and for reasons spelled out in
these notes, we think an initial position of no confirmation
or denial, and occasional coordination with the team
will get us started.
~~~~~~~~~
And that could have happened, at any point in the "Q" narrative. Before or during.
#WhatDifferenceAtThisPoint
#We'reAllinThisTogether
At this point, there are so many of All of us MAGA'ing together, all we have to do...
Is keep doing that.
When the legion of truth seekers got big enough, and united enough, and productive
enough and joined by enough MAGA people that said "I can work with this army..."
That is when the stuffing started being really scared out of the Enemedia and the Derp State...
At this point Q is just one more remarkable Anon. It's ALL of US [[[THEY]]] are after!
We know our good guys are there doing MAGA stuff with us, one way or the other.
Now, about all this "Nefarious business." This "Evil in plain sight."
Want to fight back? Curious about tools to use in your personal choice of deployment?
The Battle Sphere has many domains.
All of US are in one. The Human Social Communications Domain.
Would you like to hear from a couple of Generals about exactly that, and
about just how YOU as your OWN Army of ONE could be fighting for and defending
Our Country and the World?
Here's a 4 Star Active Duty Army General with a message for all of us about that.
The Future of War and how it affects YOU Multi-Domain Operations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOTYgcdNrXE
Here's a link to just before the General starts talking:
https://youtu.be/qOTYgcdNrXE?t=647
Be sure to note Destin's comments about our best weapons at the end.
(Do you not suppose the general had anything to do with those, too?)
"Political Grace: The art of disagreeing well."
"And the ultimate countermeasure to those who would divide:"
"Intentional unity."
Here's another General. Same topic.
Michael Flynn, talking about a
civilian army of digital soldiers...
Citizen journalists...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=V2MgTd3LgB0
(Who knows where all the "Conspiracy Theorists" get together as a united team.) (It's an overflowing Basket of DeQlorables!!!)
131 posted on
04/16/2019 4:43:00 PM PDT by
EasySt
(Say not this is the truth, but so it seems to me to be, as I see this thing I think I see #KAG)
To: ransomnote
To: ransomnote; All
Good night, all you DeQlorables!
Eternal Vigilance will Make America Great.
Again And Again.
Every Fresh Day The Lord Gives Us.
~Easy
“Tomorrow is the most important thing in life.
Comes into us at midnight very clean.
It’s perfect when it arrives and puts itself in our hands.
It hopes we’ve learned something from yesterday.”
John Wayne 1907-1979
247 posted on
04/17/2019 4:38:52 AM PDT by
EasySt
(Say not this is the truth, but so it seems to me to be, as I see this thing I think I see #KAG)
To: ransomnote
292 posted on
04/17/2019 8:33:26 AM PDT by
mairdie
(http://www.iment.com/maida/family/father/catharineburnett/hotshots.htm)
To: ransomnote
To: ransomnote
https://donsurber.blogspot.com/2019/04/trump-changes-democrat-platform-on.html
Trump changes Democrat platform on immigration
I knew President Donald John Trump had once again outfoxed the Disloyal Opposition was when I read David French’s piece on Friday, “Donald Trump’s Idea to Ship Illegal Immigrants to Sanctuary Cities Is Ridiculous and Wrong.”
French wrote, “From a purely political standpoint, how does this not backfire?”
I laughed so hard, I nearly fell in the lard.
A man who could not last a week in the 2016 presidential race dared to explain politics to the man who won the race with the most states in 20 years.
President Trump’s superpower is unmasking the hypocrites and showing the people these petty emperors are naked.
French for example posed as a conservative for years but his craven opposition to Donald Trump had him supporting Hillary by proxy, and she would have added two more loony toon leftists to the Supreme Court, flipping it,
But French also revealed the truth about sanctuary cities: they are not sanctuaries.
He wrote, “First, to the extent that the order applies to immigrants seeking asylum, we have to remember that they’re exercising a legal right.”
And President Trump is upholding the law that grants them hearings.
But French threw away that fact and said, “The idea that we will then punish people who are exercising legal rights granted by our own government by shipping them to domestic locations chosen for purely partisan and punitive purposes is plainly wrong. Depending on the circumstances, it can even be cruel.”
This guy is a Harvard Law graduate?
Really?
Maybe Harvard should have explained the meaning of the word sanctuary because these jurisdictions claim that they are disregarding federal law by saying they provide sanctuary — asylum — to illegal aliens.
President Trump is making them put their money where their pieholes are.
Predictably, liberals cried foul.
The Democrat chairmen of three House committees officially protested in a letter.
They wrote, “Not only does the administration lack the legal authority to transfer detainees in this manner, it is shocking that the president and senior administration officials are even considering manipulating release decisions for purely political reasons.”
Nancy said putting refugees in San Francisco is cruel. And she did not mean it is because people poop in the streets of San Francisco.
Her spokeswoman said, “The extent of this Administration’s cynicism and cruelty cannot be overstated. Using human beings — including little children — as pawns in their warped game to perpetuate fear and demonize immigrants is despicable, and in some cases, criminal.”
In other words, Democrats now oppose providing sanctuary in sanctuary cities for all the reasons Donald Trump does.
Democrat presidential candidates also are speaking out against illegal immigration.
Spartacus said, “I say he’s trying to pit Americans against each other and make us less safe.”
And he said, “He is injecting fear into our country and so if he was looking to solve a problem, he wouldn’t be doing things to divide this country against itself. Beware of anybody that’s trying to tell you to be afraid in the strongest country in the world as opposed to showing our strength and our courage by pulling people together to find common sense solutions to solve this problem.”
Wait a second, I thought Cory Booker and the rest of the Democrats and Fake Republicans said illegal aliens are less likely to commit a crime than native Americans.
I thought Cory Booker and the rest of the Democrats and Fake Republicans said illegal aliens are escaping crime and violence, not bringing it.
I thought Cory Booker and the rest of the Democrats and Fake Republicans said Jesus was an illegal alien and it would be unChristian not to keep an open border.
I thought Cory Booker and the rest of the Democrats and Fake Republicans said opposing illegal immigration was racist, xenophobic, and unAmerican.
Could it be that Spartacus, French, and the rest are racist, xenophobic, and unAmerican?
I mean that was how they defined it.
Maybe they should live by that definition.
The Democrat Party’s opposition to sanctuary cities providing actual sanctuary to illegal aliens is telling.
Democrats now admit that Donald John Trump was right all along.
Illegal aliens DO bring crime.
Illegal aliens DO raise expenses.
And illegal aliens DO not belong in the USA.
667 posted on
04/18/2019 6:13:22 AM PDT by
mairdie
(http://www.iment.com/maida/family/father/catharineburnett/hotshots.htm)
To: ransomnote
To: ransomnote
722 posted on
04/18/2019 8:00:14 AM PDT by
deks
To: ransomnote; All
832 posted on
04/18/2019 12:34:57 PM PDT by
stylin19a
(2016 - Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
To: ransomnote
To: ransomnote
https://donsurber.blogspot.com/2019/04/trump-wants-to-evict-illegals.html
Trump wants to evict illegals
The Housing and Urban Development told Congress it plans to scrap a Bill Clinton rule that allowed illegal aliens to get public housing assistance. This is part of President Donald John Trump’s plan to remove bad policies from all prior presidents, not just Obama.
The Washington Times reported we stopped asking more than 20 years ago people if they are citizens or if they are even here legally.
Taxpayers just shelled housing subsidies out, no questions asked. The money goes to landlords, who had no incentive to check whether a renter is legal or not.
The Times reported, “Under the new Trump rules, not only would the leaseholder using public housing have to be an eligible U.S. person, but the government would verify all applicants through the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements database, a federal system that’s used to weed illegal immigrants out of other welfare programs.
“Those already getting HUD assistance would have to go through a new verification, though it would be over a period of time and wouldn’t all come at once.”
In 1994, California voters changed its constitution to ban illegals from getting welfare. A low level federal judge declared the constitutional amendment unconstitutional.
The state never appealed that ruling.
No governor — be he Democrat, Republican or Schwarzenegger — appealed the ruling.
The will of the people no longer matters in California.
Two years later, Bill Clinton flipped the bird to the rest of us.
The Trump administration is flipping it back.
1,435 posted on
04/19/2019 7:25:28 AM PDT by
mairdie
(http://www.iment.com/maida/family/father/catharineburnett/hotshots.htm)
To: ransomnote; All
(coming to full speed from nowhere in particular, sorry)
i was driving long distance and got to listen to a solid 15 minutes of mark levin on the mueller report. i can no longer remember it all but he was on a roll! apparently he was a lawyer who defended ed meese during an iran contra investigation or whatever. he made some good points imho on what prosecutors jobs are and what their jobs are not (prove innocence). rather good commentary on the day’s events imho.
To: ransomnote
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/439234-ten-post-mueller-questions-that-could-turn-the-tables-on-russia-collusion
Ten post-Mueller questions that could turn the tables on Russia collusion investigators
By John Solomon
FTA:
...
Their work will be, and must be, far more than just a political boomerang.
It must answer, in balanced terms, whether the FBI was warranted in using the most awesome powers in the U.S. intelligence arsenal to spy on Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump’s campaign at the end of the 2016 election.
Investigators must determine, with neutrality, whether the bureau improperly colluded with paid agents of Democratic rival Hillary Clinton’s campaign — Fusion GPS and its British operative, Christopher Steele — and then tried to hide those political ties and other evidence from the nation’s secret intelligence court.
For the likes of FBI castoffs James Comey, Andrew McCabe and Peter Strzok, or Obama-era intelligence bosses John Brennan and James Clapper, there will be the additional uncomfortable reality that the Russia collusion narrative that they so publicly weaved through testimony, TV appearances, for-profit books and leaks, turned out to be as unsubstantiated as the Loch Ness monster.
The process of meting out accountability has begun.
Horowitz, my sources tell me, has interviewed between 50 and 100 witnesses in his exhaustive probe. Graham and his predecessor as Judiciary chairman, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), laid out the most important investigative issues they saw in a letter last year. This month, former House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) sent a letter to DOJ identifying eight potential criminal referrals. His committee last year also released a memo on abuses of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) that may have occurred during the Russia probe.
And President Trump reportedly is readying an order to declassify five key buckets of documents on alleged FBI abuses.
...
1,530 posted on
04/19/2019 9:54:14 AM PDT by
mairdie
(http://www.iment.com/maida/family/father/catharineburnett/hotshots.htm)
To: ransomnote
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/04/19/mark-levin-points-out-highly-political-intention-of-mueller-volume-ii/
Mark Levin Points Out Highly Political Intention of Mueller Volume II…
Mark Levin goes on a tear this morning noting the second part of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report on Trump-Russia collusion is “crap” and simply an “op-ed” on the former FBI director’s thoughts about obstruction of justice.
Levin is right… Volume I was complete nonsense, there never was any Russia collusion-conspiracy. Volume II, “Obstruction”, was always the purpose of Mueller, Weissmann and Rosenstein.
Don’t get lulled into thinking this thing is over; it is not. The Democrats don’t want people to notice the long-planned and coordinated Pelosi launch platform. The collective “left” want to run the impeachment hearing through the media, not the actual House of Representatives. Then they want the “impeachment vote” to take place at the polls in 2020.
This is a plan that is still rolling out.
1,591 posted on
04/19/2019 12:28:18 PM PDT by
mairdie
(http://www.iment.com/maida/family/father/catharineburnett/hotshots.htm)
To: ransomnote
1,727 posted on
04/19/2019 3:42:52 PM PDT by
mairdie
(http://www.iment.com/maida/family/father/catharineburnett/hotshots.htm)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
