Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dr. Fauci in New England Journal of Medicine Concedes the Coronavirus Mortality Rate May Be Much Closer to a Bad Flu
New England Journal Of Medicine ^ | 03/26/20

Posted on 03/27/2020 8:38:21 AM PDT by Enlightened1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: Enlightened1

Imagine if the death rate falls below the flu?

Regardless the outcome, Trump’s fault


21 posted on 03/27/2020 8:53:40 AM PDT by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Bookmark


22 posted on 03/27/2020 8:54:26 AM PDT by BunnySlippers (I love Bull Markets!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberal Anti Venom

>>>Do the asshats in DC truly believe that a gubmint check for $1200 every month is going to keep them afloat?<<<

Every Month? I thought it was a one time deal until they Pass another ridiculous Bill.

Heck, I can’t even go the Casino to so I can turn that $1,200 into some real Money.


23 posted on 03/27/2020 8:55:24 AM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Kill a Commie for your Mommy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Mendelsohn was a doctor who was skeptical of many if not most of the common practices of the medical establishment. He wrote a series of books in the late 70’s/early 80’s which you can find out there if you really want to know.

He had this hilarious delivery like a Borscht Belt comic.
(”Why on earth would you ever go to the hospital? They’ve got germs floating around in there that you can’t find anywhere else in town!). He claimed that many of his colleagues secretly agreed with him on various issues but chastised him for taking them to the general public.

“Bob, you’re right about that, but did you have to go public? Why don’t you just publish it in the medical journals?”

Answer: Because nobody READS medical journals.

I suspect that’s some of what Fauci is doing here, burying his admission in a forum where few will see it. Guess that backfired.


24 posted on 03/27/2020 8:56:23 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: abb

“This article would have been much more helpful 2 or 3 wks ago than today. Before the panic set in.”

Sadly, the people who give talking points to Fauci were invested in prolonging the panic. He knew; he just didn’t share the information.


25 posted on 03/27/2020 8:58:38 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam (Immigrants with tuberculosis and polio are welcome, but youÂ’d better be able to prove your dog is v)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam

Yes, it might be equivalent to a bad flu if you are younger than 60.


26 posted on 03/27/2020 9:08:06 AM PDT by diatomite (Libs, the MSM, journos, actors - all are on the low-end of the Dunning-Kreuger effect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative

Hmmm. I just assumed it was $1200 per monthz, but if not, they are dumber than I thought if they expect a one time payment of $1200 will get people through this “shut-down” because according to our brilliant mayor in Los Angeles this shut down will last for MONTHS.

Waiting for the riots to begin and hopefully looking forward to seeing asshat politicians like the LA mayor being hung by his feet from street lights when this farce is over and done.


27 posted on 03/27/2020 9:08:55 AM PDT by Liberal Anti Venom (In a free society, the last refuge of a moron is tyranny. ~Jeremy Egerer~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Liberal Anti Venom

Don’t forget that the Bill includes money to “enhance” Unemployment Benefits so People receive their full Salary.

When that kicks in why would People rush back to work? What about all the Small Business Owners who can’t apply for Unemployment while watching their Life’s work collapse?


28 posted on 03/27/2020 9:13:18 AM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Kill a Commie for your Mommy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: abb

This article would have been much more helpful 2 or 3 wks ago than today. Before the panic set in.
+++++
This is very much a regional outbreak. In New York there were more than 6000 NEW CASES YESTERDAY. In California the total caseload is about 3000. The total number of cases in Orange County CA is under 300.

The current New York caseload is over 37,000 and is doubling every 3 to 4 days.

If I lived in New York, and particularly NYC, panic would be quite an appropriate emotion. Those people are really going to be suffering this week and next. After that - who knows.


29 posted on 03/27/2020 9:15:16 AM PDT by InterceptPoint (Ted, you finally endorsed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: abb
Looks to me like the article was published on February 28. In fact, according to the disclosure form, Fauci submitted it to the Journal on February 16.

BTW, here's the money passage:

On the basis of a case definition requiring a diagnosis of pneumonia, the currently reported case fatality rate is approximately 2%.4 In another article in the Journal, Guan et al.5 report mortality of 1.4% among 1099 patients with laboratory-confirmed Covid-19; these patients had a wide spectrum of disease severity. If one assumes that the number of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic cases is several times as high as the number of reported cases, the case fatality rate may be considerably less than 1%. This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10% and 36%, respectively.

30 posted on 03/27/2020 9:18:36 AM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

“This editorial was published on February 28, 2020, at NEJM.org.”


31 posted on 03/27/2020 9:20:57 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

This page is having a problem loading
We tried to load this page for you a few times, but there is still a problem with this site.


32 posted on 03/27/2020 9:21:58 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

You don’t know how bamboozled we’ve been until you do a search for Fauci, Event 201 and Bill Gates for their mRNA-1273 vaccine. Follow the money and you’ll see why they oppose the hydroxycholoquine treatment.


33 posted on 03/27/2020 9:30:15 AM PDT by bgill (CDC site doesn't recommend wearing a mask to protect from COVID-19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick

Looks to me like the article was published on February 28. In fact, according to the disclosure form, Fauci submitted it to the Journal on February 16.


With this, that is ancient history. At that time the disease was mostly isolated to China, and figures on ratios of unknown cases weren’t yet available so people were pretty completely guessing.

“If one assumes that the number of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic cases is several times as high as the number of reported cases, the case fatality rate may be considerably less than 1%. “

“If one assumes...”
“If one assumes...”
“If one assumes...”

If one assumes things since proven to be wrong, yes, alternate conclusions are available.

So he didn’t actually say the fatality rate is like the flu, but merely posited that the unknowns of the time included that possibility - which we appear to have moved well beyond.


34 posted on 03/27/2020 9:31:15 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
We've been bamboozled.

“Oh, I say and I say it again. You’ve been had! Ya been took! Ya been hoodwinked! Bamboozled! Led astray! Run amok! This is what he does!”

35 posted on 03/27/2020 9:32:33 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
This is outdated information.

Dr. Fouci initially was saying it was like a bad flu, then he changed to saying it was 10 times more lethal than the flu.

"This editorial was published on February 28, 2020, at NEJM.org."

On Mar 11, Dr. Fouci said it was 10 times worse than the flu. So your information is outdated

Coronavirus 10 times more lethal than flu

36 posted on 03/27/2020 9:33:05 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
And just like that, Dr. Fauci realizes how it feels to be a pawn.
37 posted on 03/27/2020 9:34:18 AM PDT by liberalh8ter (The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

“If one assumes that the number of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic cases is several times as high as the number of reported cases, the case fatality rate may be considerably less than 1%.”


Yes. If you make unwarranted assumptions, you can reach unwarranted conclusions. That’s not really a surprise.

Is there another quotation that you’ve found in there where he provides actual Wuhan Coronavirus-linked evidence for such an assumption? This one sure didn’t.


38 posted on 03/27/2020 9:34:44 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: liberalh8ter
And just like that, Dr. Fauci realizes how it feels to be a pawn.


39 posted on 03/27/2020 9:35:08 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Published 02/28/2020.
How long did it take to research and source this document?
The latest and most of the sources are from WHO and are dated as late as 02/26/2020.

The words “It suggests” are used to indicate the data shows it could be more like a flu outbreak.

So with that said, as of today 03/27/2020, has the data changed that would change the opinion that it’s more like a flu outbreak?

Will any MSM ask him about it?
And will Dr. Fauci admit this on national T.V.?

and for the record, I happen to believe I should be, with caution, up and about and around with no restrictions - playing golf.


40 posted on 03/27/2020 9:46:39 AM PDT by stylin19a (((2016 - Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson