Posted on 09/15/2020 3:51:23 PM PDT by ransomnote
Maybe their funding dried up. Trump mentioned auntiefaz funding to Judge Jeanine recently. She asked who was funding it and Trump said something about “you’ll know soon”.
Ok, will add [edits:mine] in future.
I edited that word out because someone else had gotten in trouble for posting it.
I didn’t notice it...good catch!
That Q ball would make a lovely Christmas ornament.
Petey
HAHAHAHA
The record is 6, you only had 5 duplicate posts.
“For those who have asked why we are not on @FoxNews: Hubby said on @LouDobbs accurate statement...that @georgesoros controls part of StateDept. Victoria Nuland had open door policy with him. Can’t criticize Soros on Fox. Just ask @newtgingrich. #maga2020— Victoria Toensing (@VicToensing) September 17, 2020”
+++++++++++++++++’
I’m enjoying seeing Victoria and Joe on Newsmax
Petey
A good post, well stated. Whenever someone asks why Wray or (fill in the blank) is still employed or not indicted, the answer comes down to the same thing: timing and proof. In cases like Wray, there’s no indication of criminality, but the political implications of firing another FBI director - one Trump appointed this time - would be huge. He would be accused of trying to cover up and it could cost him the election.
In other cases, the pivotal factor is proof, evidence that can stand up in court. The worst thing would be for someone like Comey to be indicted and then acquitted “forever”. Sessions started the ball rolling but impeachment and Mueller’s witch hunt threw the brakes on, and there was a sequence to be followed, including waiting for the Horowitz report which slowed things down.
Remember the Teflon Don, John Gotti, was acquitted 3 times before they finally sent him to prison, and the process took over six years. And organized crime is big, but tiny compared to the deep state.
The 200,000 sealed indictments remain like UFOs, we want to believe but have no way to know until something happens. But everything I’ve read says this is an unprecedented number.
A guest on Tucker tonight was talking about Soros funding all of these USELESS Marxist state AG’s and district attorneys and the conversation was allowed to go on Tucker was agreeing with the guy, the guest was a special opps sniper!!
Don't worry about it.
Any mention of most gummint agencies (but particularly the FBI) merits /sarc by default.
...been that way for me at least ever since '68.
Don't hate the gummint. Just don't trust 'em as far as I can throw the entire District of Columbia.
LOL. Like I told my daughter, I assume the government is lying till proven otherwise.
Can't disagree.
SERIOUSLY....
WHAT THE HELL IS
JOE BIDEN SAYING?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 pic.twitter.com/Yjd7mAkbKT— 🇺🇸🇺🇸 Miguelifornia (@michaelbeatty3) September 18, 2020
C'mon man! Errybody know I'm the Sauce King!
C'mon man! Errybody know I'm the Sauce King!
Only hell knows.
Hmm, so what specifically does “rig for red” mean? If it isn’t helpful for avoiding detection.
***********************************************************************************************
“Rig for Red” is normally a command used in the Control Room. It is normally used when the boat is going to be surfacing or coming to Periscope Depth at night.
The purpose is to give the lookouts and the officer designated to head to the bridge upon surfacing a chance for their eyes to adjust to darkness, or the OOD the same thing before looking through the Periscope.
My nightlights are red-so that when I turn them off on leaving the room, I can still see well enough to avoid bumping into stuff.
RE: Spying. I read somewhere that the spying began years before 2015, and included the beauty pageant that was in Russia, IIRC.
For those of you not watching, this is pretty much what’s going on... 😬 pic.twitter.com/T3BO1dsj6B— 𝕞𝕖𝕝𝕚𝕤𝕤𝕒 🙈🙉🙊 (@my3monkees) September 18, 2020
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.