Posted on 11/02/2020 1:31:24 PM PST by CharlesOConnell
You are describing people like Dr. George Hodel, the alleged murderer of the Black Dahlia, and suspected Zodiac Killer. He was a wealthy man who felt himself superior to any else who came into his presence. His detective son wrote an excellent and convincing book fingering his father, who he described as a sociopath.
Sidney Greenstreet was also in “Between Two Worlds” 1944. Very good movie.
A couple of bombings tomorrow will kick off a civil war.
I think trump should play that video at a rally.
Is a person with a BA degree in medieval French Poetry educated?
One of myscouts did that and finally got work with amnesty international
I suppose that depends.
I think it mostly depends on character, as to what value any education has.
A couple of bombings tomorrow will kick off a civil war.
It could go one of two ways.
The Left bombs a polling place in an area of predominantly Trump supporters. The MSM blames it on Trump supporters doing a false flag. The allegation would be Trump, “knowing that he would lose, would use it as an excuse to put martial law in place” (mind you I’m using CNN/MSNBC’s expected propaganda line).
The Left bombs a polling place in Biden territory, and blames it on Trump “knowing he would lose, his supporters engage in extreme voter intimidation”. The bomber is quickly identified and he already has a fake legend.
I have had to jettison a lot of friends due to their buying into the false narrative of the likes that all the destruction in Minneapolis was caused by white supremacists.
>destruction in Minneapolis was caused by white supremacists
There seems to be a lot of Whites in BLM riots for Black supremacy.
I can’t help thinking about how the Left was all for “majority rule”, meaning Black rule, in South Africa. The only consistency is Black supremacy.
They could report that Biden won the election.
Eventually the 1964 New York Times Co. v. Sullivan decision must be challenged and overturned. Just like pornography law, libel law was never understood to be affected by the First Amendment until 1964. Pornography law is still on the books, and libel law legitimately should be also.The reason is simple: the Federalists had much bigger fish to fry - getting consensus support for the new constitution - than trying to change libel law or any other right of the people or the states via the Bill of Rights. Deliberately assaying to change a right was the furthest thing from their minds, and no court questioned that until the Warren Court’s Sullivan decision. The First Amendment doesn’t say anything about libel, and it doesn’t legitimately mean anything about libel.
Mark Levin had President Trump on his TV show a few weeks ago, and both of them agreed that Sullivan has to go.
They’ve been threatening it.
Democrats Issue Veiled Threat, Vote For Joe Biden Or Cities Burn, Say They Will NOT Concede To Trump
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Be60iWavSek
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.