Posted on 11/13/2020 4:50:55 AM PST by HypatiaTaught
I believe there is a legal term called, “preponderance of the evidence.” I think it is limited to civil cases, but the standard is that something is probably true if there is a 50% chance that something wrong has happened.
“”Didn’t 71 million voters who voted legally have their constitutional rights denied?””
I have been thinking the same thing. Aren’t we all covered by the Equal Protection Clause in the 14th Amendment?
Exactly! That will be the "expedient" course they will choose. After all they have deadlines facing them and even though the evidence is glaring, they will "go with the flow". That's why the socialists parade China Joe daily in front of a backdrop that proclaims "President-Elect" - mental conditioning for a "fait accompli" to get them to say there's nothing that can be done, so let it stand.
I’m no lawyer, but I wonder if a tainted election can be seen as a Civil case as well as a Criminal case. I think true justice would want to see these election results thrown out based on the preponderance of the evidence. Throw the matter to the state delegations. I’d like to see the Supreme Court require it.
I believe this in a nation wide conspiracy, controlled by the Democrats (both national and statewide), programmers at Dominion voting systems, and the Deep State intelligence services of the United States. A COUP to be sure. There will be fighting in the streets by BLM/Antifa protestors, for which President Trump will need to invoke the Insurrection Act. May God Bless our nation.
Who do you trust to count these revotes?
Hunter Biden is looking for work. It's true he has absolutely no expertise in this area, but for $1.5B, he's willing to give it a shot.
A recount is just going to count the same ballots again, many of them illegal.
An audit however, is actually an investigation and is conducted by lawyers and CPAs who know what to look for that constitutes fraud.
Revote would work also but you're talking a massive, expensive effort to conduct the election in these battleground states a second time.
I've read that the Supreme Court in the past is not prone to throw votes out but to fix what is already in place. Or is this fraud so massive that they will have to address issues they have not dealt with before?
It all comes down to the Supreme Court. I don't think the democRATs or the Trump campaign will accept a lower court's decision if it goes against them, without appealing it to the SC.
And meanwhile, the nation holds its collective breath.
How do you identify the tens of thousands of ballots that were harvested by precinct captains using intimidation and coercion and knocking on doors to gather them? Remember, these folks don't speak up because they know what will happen to them.
For the RE-VOTE crowd, it’s not possible from a logistical standpoint. The US Constitution declares that electors are due to the EC by “The second Wednesday after the first Tuesday” in December. Since a state hast to certify its results before electors are chosen, then this narrows time windows even further. Besides that, you have to reprint every single ballot in every single state. So you can forget a RE-VOTE.
The other issue is this: the lection did not have just Trump or Biden on ballots. House Reps, Senators, State Reps, Issues, Measures, etc. were also on every ballot. What happens to those? You cannot just throw out ballots because the POTUS election was fraudulent. Throwing out ballots means all those other people and issue get thrown out also. You cannot force THEM to have to rerun their races. So the only option left is to simply disqualify any fradulent ballot, or in the case of some states, disqualify every ballot that came in after each state’s mandated due time. So in PA for example, every ballot after 11/3 at 8 PM - gone. Seems that’s the only thing that can happen without jeopardizing races already that have been won by people under the POTUS nominees on every ballot in every state.
And you ask the Left what their problem with Trump is and they just call him, without any supporting evidence, vile, vitriolic, venomous names that have nothing to do with reality.
They call him a racist but can't point to anything specific. Meanwhile he had more black support than any Republican candidate in history.
They call him a sexist but can't point to anything specific. Meanwhile he employs more females in upper positions in his administration than any president in history.
They call him a nazi but exhibit more of that behavior themselves than he does.
He'll never win for losing with these people.
A democrat chosen by the Biden team and a republican chosen by the Trump team sitting side by side.
The one ace up their sleave the D’s have is that they can drag their feet and get the SCOTUS to do to Trump what they did to Gore - “you’ve run out of time so the first count stands”. If we are approaching that point, the argument may be to simply throw out the results from the state in question because they have been so horribly tainted.
But the lawyers and CPAs are more equipped than anybody to find the fraud.
Okay if this is the case...
Every ballot being tossed after 8pm, Trump will then win Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin and Georgia.
Bada bing, bada boom!
Either the courts throw out the entirety of a star’s votes fir PITUS because the fraud was so large and pervasive as to irretrievably contaminate the vote permanently (which I think is HIGHLY unlikely), or the particular state legislatures in quest have to do this by picking Trump Electors. There is frankly no other way - so Trump has to prove not just to the courts, but to public opinion, that the voting machines were corrupted and switched massive numbers of votes to Biden. Barring that, say goodbye to our nation.
Either they certify their electoral group by the date certain, or it goes to the states, one vote each, as represented by their seated delegates in January.
The law is written, clear and easy to follow.
SCOTUS determines if Constitutional Law was broken. if not, States run elections.
The Federal Government is a tool and creature of the States. not of The People.
As in most of these things, follow the Constitution to come up with the correct outcome.
Roger that.
Yes, the totality of the evidence proves there was massive fraud, but there are millions of fraudulent ballots mixed in with the legal ballots and I don’t think they can be truly separated at this point. So the state legislatures should meet and vote their state’s Electoral College voters directly, as per Article II of the Constitution and try to make a secure voting system (sure to be fought tooth and nail by Democrats).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.