Posted on 02/07/2021 1:32:14 AM PST by RandFan
After translation, mRNA is naturally broken down. It is not there indefinitely. There is a proteolytic cleaving process for translated mRNA.
mRNA is the messenger, and what happens to it once the message is delivered is likely unimportant. The message is used to produce something that is designed and intended to remain indefinitely, if not permanently.
Yes T cell immunity. Just like what your body does with every other virus. Now you get the point. It stimulates your body to act like it was exposed to prevent sickness without getting sick
You do realize this is exactly what a virus does. Takes over your cell and pumps out RNA to replicate itself in tile the cell dies. Then your body creates antibodies to neutralize the infection. You guessed it through RNA. It leaves memory immunity.
It does not genetically modify you. It does not. Are new exposures dangerous. You are almost to understanding of why this works.
Do you hold yourself up as a bible believing Christian? Do you believe God made man perfect and that mans sin brought death into this world?
Forgive me for my mistake of lumping all non christians into the atheist group.
Most people aren’t “looking” for a reason not to take the “vaccine. They know the reason why they are not going to take the vaccine.
Crickets....
Interesting observation, I have several older dictionary’s and none of them use the term “synthetic” or “synthesized” in there definitions of “vaccine”.
It appears that some online dictionary’s have added those words to there definitions. one used the term “(such as a strand of synthesized RNA)”.
Where in my older M.Webster it says “such as a bacterium or virus or one of its components or products such as a protein or toxin”.
The question I have it what relevance is this beside a smear
I believe the Good Book admonishes Christians to judge not lest ye be judged.
And as to your irrelevant question I hold the Bible to be the inerrant world of God. I believe the scripture records that God created man in His own image. If you want to engage in a theological debate, fine. I think you might find yourself based on your very unchristian judgment quite outmatched.
Are you on HCQ for your lupus?
Not trusting big pharma here. Remember Hydroxychloroquine?
Big pharma told me it’s dangerous as hell and spun a narrative that it was bad news. But when I read the CDC literature it stated:
Hydroxychloroquine can be prescribed to adults and children of all ages. It can also be safely taken by pregnant women and nursing mothers.
They lied to use it as a weapon against DJT and to also make billions by distorting CV19 facts.
Read this commentary, it articulates better than I can my concerns and objections to the vaccines being put out.
Good Day!
Yeah.. I’ve reached out to a few people with that question and haven’t heard anything back. Makes sense to me to keep checking antibodies vs getting a vax (at least for the time being).
Your notion that “evil” doesn’t afflict us in a physical way or that demonic possession isn’t real is directly opposed to the bible.
...”One of their founders holds disease to be Because of evil spirits in the body. We left the notion of good and evil humors about 5 centuries ago”...
also, assuming you are an atheist based on your post isn’t judging you, nor unreasonable. thanks for sharing.
Most of our investigational medicines are formulated and administered in an LNP which may lead to systemic side effects related to the components of the LNP which may not have ever been tested in humans.
While we have continued to optimize our LNPs, there can be no assurance that our LNPs will not have undesired effects. Our LNPs could contribute, in whole or in part, to one or more of the following: immune reactions, infusion reactions, complement reactions, opsonation reactions, antibody reactions including IgA, IgM, IgE or IgG or some combination thereof, or reactions to the PEG from some lipids or PEG otherwise associated with the LNP.
Certain aspects of our investigational medicines may induce immune reactions from either the mRNA or the lipid as well as adverse reactions within liver pathways or degradation of the mRNA or the LNP, any of which could lead to significant adverse events in one or more of our clinical trials.
Many of these types of side effects have been seen for legacy LNPs. There may be resulting uncertainty as to the underlying cause of any such adverse event, which would make it difficult to accurately predict side effects in future clinical trials and would result in significant delays in our programs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.