I did. I stand corrected and hang my head in shame.
#BagsterFail
Posted on 09/01/2021 6:03:54 PM PDT by datura
I did. I stand corrected and hang my head in shame.
#BagsterFail
Well, just don’t get the shot, if you doubt it so much.
I don’t think anybody here cares whether you do or not.
What I hear you saying is, old people are frightened rabbits who run in terror from one group, the Covid Gang, only to be confronted by another scary group, the Anti-Vax Boys.
Its like a bad horror movie, right? Or an Abbot and Costello movie with Frankenstein, Dracula, AND the Wolfman.
Poor old people. Lab rabbits trapped between monsters.
#SoDramatic
You obviously have no respect for people of differing opinions. And you’re the perfect example of the smart-alecks here who ridicule and demonize anyone who happens to disagree with them.
You must be a radical liberal disguising yourself as a conservatively-minded human being.
Which is why so many Branch Covidians are spreading out-and-out lies about the safety and efficacy of the jabs, now-banned trolls were crowing that the jabs were going to get full approval by this time (not just an extension of the EUA), and lying about the dangers of Ivermectin and dismissing it as “Horse paste”.
Of course they care; but only in their own monetary interest or out of fear.
They suspend it in dihydrogen monoxide.
Check THAT out.
I really don’t think anyone cares whether YOU take the vaccine or not.
You’re just another anonymouse on the Internet.
(Why do you have this compulsion to save other people from their own personal decisions, anyway?)
Because if you have to ask that by now, you’re trolling.
You must be the only person that doesn’t know graphene oxide is in
these shots. It has to be there because that ingredient is the real reason for the shots.
“ Because if you have to ask that by now, you’re trolling.”
———————————————————————————-
Not sure you ever answered that question G.W………….
Why such interest in other people’s vaccination status?
Why such drama and post after post after post of anti-vaccine material?
Who are you trying to save? The people that you dislike and refer to as Trolls and other names?
Then, once it’s known who you’re trying to save, the next obvious question is……..Why?
You seem to show distain for people here that don’t believe everything as you do. As if you wouldn’t even throw them a rope to get them out of shark infested waters yet you want the same people to believe your high moral standards of saving us from our own choices?
Very bizarre……
I mean, its ok, I can accept that. But it is quite a contradiction.
Typical no-answer ‘answer’ from a radical leftist.
They all think they’re ‘saving the world’; but they have no substance to them.
The question you should have asked is this.
It's been over a year and a half since the doom videos of people dropping dead mid-step in Wuhan and getting welded into their apartments. The dire predictions of a Spanish-flu like worldwide calamity are proven false. The CDC has now admitted to cooking the books. And the deaths were 40% people with diabetes anyway (preventable if you eat healthy and exercise). And the age distribution of deaths looked like this:
And the manufacturers now admit they knew of all kinds of side effects of the jabs.
And the jabs have had more deaths reported to VAERS than all real vaccinations combined since VAERS started
Why are they STILL pushing everyone to get jabbed?
This article is a recycle that just keeps going round and round - Pfizer marketing guy -yeah, that's a qualification to assess the chemical and biological composition of a complex substance. Right.
Years ago, I would try debating 911 Troofers. It would always go like this: I'd demolish one of their premises or conclusions and the response would be, "BUT, blablablabla (blablablabla being another idiotic assertion like "steel doesn't burn."). So then I'd demolish that one and the response would be BUT blablablabla - ad infinitum. Always, at some point in the "discussion," they'd begin hurling insults and accusations at me. The same things happen on these threads. Ugh. I gave up trying to reason with Troofer retards and I'm not going to start doing the same thing here - peace out.
As far as the "vaccinations" go my take on them is a simple, clear one based only on the facts we absolutely do know about them, not conjecture or crazy or unprovable theories.
Here are those FACTS: They are not traditional vaccines but an experimental technology that has never been approved for use in humans before. They have not undergone traditional, long term, Phase 3 trials so no one knows what, if any, long term side effects they might cause. There have been thousands of reports of terrible side effects and probable deaths due to these injections. Yes, correlation is not causation but given what I've read and the many testimonies I've watched it is ludicrous not to conclude that many people, especially young folks, have been seriously harmed and even killed by these injections. And of course, there's the "elephant in the room," which is the fact that the disease itself has an extremely high survival rate with the vast majority of those who contract it being asymptomatic and those most at risk of death from it belonging to narrow bands in the population; the very old, the very sick and the very unhealthy.
Belonging to none of those groups I consider it mad to allow myself to be injected with an experimental substance with no long term track record of safety or efficacy. And that's that - no crazy theories required to reach that sober conclusion.
You should read what she said not toss around your ill informed opinion.
You seem awfully invested in believing Big Pharma that they are disclosing all the ingredients in these “vaccines”. Why is that?
Grey Whiskers a radical leftist? You must be joking or are just delusional. He is as conservative a thinker as anyone on the site.
He’s certainly using tactics indistinguishable from theirs.
Referring to people who happen to disagree with him as ‘Branch Covidians’ and ‘Trolls’ isn’t exactly Conservative civility.
Otherwise known as losing.
Do you really think that anything useful or convincing is accomplished by labeling people ‘Branch Covidians’ and ‘trolls’ just because they disagree with you?
It’s going to turn thoughtful people off, just as saying that someone White is ‘unavoidably and culturally oppressive and racist’ does.
But I guess GW isn’t interested in targeting the thoughtful people. Just the knee-jerk reactionaries.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.