Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Decarbonizing the Grid Means Using a Lot More Land to Produce Electricity
Real clear science ^ | July 11, 2022 | Ross Pomeroy

Posted on 08/23/2022 6:02:52 AM PDT by daniel1212

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
excerpt
1 posted on 08/23/2022 6:02:52 AM PDT by daniel1212
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

The underlying core principle is false. Carbon (CO2) is NOT a pollutant, certainly not in the amounts we emit via industry and agriculture.

To state otherwise is bad science and/or a lie.


2 posted on 08/23/2022 6:05:31 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur: ad ferre non, velit esse sine defensione)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212; All

The greenies and lunatic Left will never accept nuclear power at the level needed. The Hollywood fed overreaction to three mile island may have doomed humanity to their climate change horror. Gotta love the irony?


3 posted on 08/23/2022 6:07:49 AM PDT by newzjunkey (Giant meteor 2022!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

They want to cram most of the population into congested urban centers. The bulk of the country can become a vast field of solar panels.


4 posted on 08/23/2022 6:09:05 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (We are already in a revolutionary period, and the Rule of Law means nothing. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

My first thought too....

Agenda 2030. UN.


5 posted on 08/23/2022 6:14:04 AM PDT by C210N (Everything will be okay in the end. If it’s not okay, it’s not the end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

Decarbonizing the Grid Means Using a Lot More Land to Produce Electricity And The Gradual De-industrialization of America.

Prognosis: As energy costs rise, food become too expensive to buy. Food riots begin; the country becomes ungovernable, except by brute force; America returns to a feudal society and slavery.


6 posted on 08/23/2022 6:28:35 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

Not if nuclear powerplants are built...


7 posted on 08/23/2022 6:29:43 AM PDT by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag
Agreed. CO2 is not a pollutant. I find it funny that the folks who say it is tend to be the same folks who say we need lots and lots more trees. LOL

By the way, warming isn't a bad thing either. Not only have we been cooling a hair the past 10 to 20 years (which I believe to be just a hiccup in the warming, not a start of a new cooling period), but our Modern Warm Period is actually a good time to be alive. At least from a climate perspective, I'd gladly take life in one of the warming periods over life in one of the cooling periods.

8 posted on 08/23/2022 6:31:07 AM PDT by Tell It Right (1st Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212
...to replace fossil fuels with carbon-free sources of power like wind and solar...

And the stupidity continues. Ask the people in north TX how those worked out for them. How do you disposed of a 60' fiberglass blade when stress fractures appear? Where are you going to get the rare earth minerals for the batteries for storage when it's dark and the wind speed can't turn the turbine? Completely stupid.

9 posted on 08/23/2022 6:32:14 AM PDT by econjack (I'm not bossy. I just know what you should be doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212
Using "a lot more land" would also increase "carbonization" -- Whatever that means.

So it's basically a lose-lose proposition.

10 posted on 08/23/2022 6:33:59 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag

It shall never be possible to completely decarbonize the grid. The world will be relying on hydrocarbon-based fuels for decades if not centuries into the future. Carbon dioxide, after all, is the true essential for all life on earth, as it is the source of both the carbon that goes into formation of carbohydrates, the basis of most foodstuffs that sustain life, and the free atmospheric oxygen we breathe in to extract the potential energy in carbohydrates.

For good, sustainable, long term power, the use of nuclear energy is by far the most cost-efficient means to produce that power. A nuclear reactor can continue to generate heat 24/7/365 for YEARS before refueling is required, and the heat may be used to power steam-driven dynamos, to evaporate sea water to collect in a condensation tower, or to refine and smelt any number of industrial metal products.

And this nuclear power need not be a uranium-fueled Light Water Reactor. Thorium-fueled molten salt reactors are superior to the LWR reactors in just about every way, are much safer to have in locations of high population density, and have the added advantage of being able to process the “spent” uranium fuel rods in to a very small package of radioactive “waste”, as compared to the fuel rods.


11 posted on 08/23/2022 6:39:13 AM PDT by alloysteel (Be alert. The world needs more lerts. And smile. It adds to your face value.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

In fact the land your house sits on will likely be needed. You need to give up your car and move to an apt where you can experience diversity in all its glory.


12 posted on 08/23/2022 6:44:36 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

I’ll never forget Great Adventure Park in New Jersey cut down 20 acres of trees to put up solar panels. Friggen retards.


13 posted on 08/23/2022 6:47:15 AM PDT by Wilderness Conservative (Nature is the ultimate conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

Decarbonizing the grid.......... what a poor use of words. What an ignorant writer

The grid is not carbonized. The grid is electrified. The grid is aluminum and copper wires running between transformers


14 posted on 08/23/2022 6:58:03 AM PDT by bert ( (KWE. NP. N.C. +12) Juneteenth is inequality day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

What makes no sense to me is when they plant solar panels on productive agricultural land?

There are millions of acres of non-productive desert in the USA. So why not plant solar panels on these acres?


15 posted on 08/23/2022 7:01:02 AM PDT by Presbyterian Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

If we convert to wind and solar vs. nuclear as an alternative to coal, etc. - if we were to have a “year without a summer” from a natural disaster blotting out the amount of sunlight, we would be in very serious trouble...whereas with nuclear, quality of life could be more maintained with a reliable power source.


16 posted on 08/23/2022 7:04:05 AM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

Yup....it used to be Open Spaces were given tax breaks. Now, the Towns want the income from these farmlands...and voila...we’re killing them forever with Solar Farms.


17 posted on 08/23/2022 7:09:23 AM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack

From what I hear, those blades will be turned into gummy bears.


18 posted on 08/23/2022 7:11:34 AM PDT by Night Hides Not (Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! Remember Gonzales! Come and Take It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

“The greenies and lunatic Left will never accept nuclear power at the level needed.”

As long as that’s the case, we know the climate is not an “emergency” and we can ignore them.

Now, we just need to remove the current bunch of criminals running the country, and reverse the current disastrous policies...

Regardless, the world needs a LOT more energy going forward. The only sane way to achieve that is putting a large amount of nuclear power into the mix. Various next-gen reactor designs are walk-away safe, and nuclear waste is a solvable problem.

Perhaps within a few decades we’ll have even better options.


19 posted on 08/23/2022 7:24:41 AM PDT by PreciousLiberty (Make America Greater Than Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
And as answered by a C Stuart Hardwick · at https://www.quora.com/If-nuclear-power-plants-are-so-safe-why-have-several-of-them-failed-so-catastrophically/answer/C-Stuart-Hardwick

Three Mile Island failed so catastrophically that its safety systems worked as designed, and only because of human error was any radiation released at all, and that radiation was not harmful to anyone (the total radiation release was trivial compared to background).

Fukushima, which should never have been built where it was, failed in exactly the way the AEC had warned it might, and failed so catastrophically that—even though safety systems were eventually overwhelmed — no one was killed.

The reactors at Chernobyl should never have been built at all, lacking the secondary containment needed to accommodate the sort of failure that occurred and the control systems needed to prevent human error from triggering it. It failed so catastrophically that almost 60 people were killed, and eventually, as many as 6 or 7 thousand may die of all cancers and illnesses related to the event—a tiny fraction of the number killed every single year in the US by auto accidents, radon released from coal-fired power plants, or pollution from coal-fired power plants.

Even after accounting for these three large failures—failures that should never have happened and can be prevented by switching to later, safer reactor designs — nuclear energy is still a thousand times safer per kilowatt hour produced than coal, and safer even than wind power. (And unlike coal and gas-fired power plants, nuclear is carbon-free.)

We have the technology to make nuclear reactors that fail safe. We’ve used them without incident in US navel vessels for decades. We now have much better technology, and can make fail-safe reactors that either shut down or idle no matter the human error or insult—and the next generation of reactors won’t even need enriched fuel and will be able to consume the spent fuel from past reactors.

20 posted on 08/23/2022 7:26:41 AM PDT by daniel1212 (Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned+destitute sinner, trust Him who saves, be baptized + follow Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson