Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A long-lost branch of the Nile helped in building Egypt's pyramids – Scientists Say
Arkeonews ^ | 1 September 2022 | Oguz Buyukyildirim

Posted on 09/04/2022 8:33:23 PM PDT by SunkenCiv

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: gnarledmaw
goodgroovy
21 posted on 09/05/2022 11:44:06 AM PDT by gnarledmaw (Hive minded liberals worship leaders, sovereign conservatives elect servants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: gnarledmaw

So sandstone is hard? Who know?


22 posted on 09/05/2022 12:26:14 PM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: PIF
I would imagine that nearly everyone knows that sandstone limestone is very hard by comparison to silt which is what we are discussing.

And the issue isnt just that of relative hardness but the idea of being able to create those formations from the slow removal of nearby material. I believe that this kind of depth to width suggests a large amount of the surface exposed and the water has some degree of force behind it. It doesnt require a geologist to point out the difference. Just about anyone living in an area with limestone outcroppings/caves should be able to show someone the difference in damage to the rock between dripping/draining and a flow with even minimal force behind it.

Its not just my theory. Its not just a theory of Schochs. Christianson believes these were created by rapid water movement and in the ancient past but he believes it happened in faults before the Sphinx was even quarried. Lehner claims there was a period of climate change. Climatologists Rudolph Kuper and Stefan Kröpelin, feel that it was just wetter there longer than the dates presently accepted by most. They all believe the answer involves more water, none of them can agree on when it was.

Its true, there are those that believe very small amounts of water were involved. Some believe small amounts of water drove the process of haloclasty, they just dont exactly agree on how it got there. I would have to see evidence of some type of fault that would allow some areas to deteriorate to such depths compared to the entire surface before I were willing to consider this as the sole answer.

The point being when it occurred and exactly how it occurred certainly isnt settled science. Maybe there was more than one factor involved. The one theory that cant explain it is gradual pond dredging and certainly cant explain it on its own.

None of that gets into any of the other problems with that theory. The fact is that none of these theories are hills I plan to die on, youre going to have to write to them. I just know that my tombstone wont be on the pile of dredgings.

23 posted on 09/05/2022 2:37:07 PM PDT by gnarledmaw (Hive minded liberals worship leaders, sovereign conservatives elect servants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: gnarledmaw

I’m not going to argue with you because you must know more than the guy who actually went there photographed it, founding evidence it was the result of vertical dredging and explored the areas that are closed to tourists and not visited by anyone in over a century.


24 posted on 09/05/2022 2:45:51 PM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson