Your link substantiates my comment. No pandemic, no need for vaccinations.
One of these things is not like the other.
Kinda like FReepers and you, bio-lab Vaxway government man.
Posted on 09/09/2022 4:35:48 AM PDT by george76
misinformation: (n) unauthorized truth
The lying CDC?????
Were supposed to believe them when they can’t even keep their story straight for more than a couple months???????
What a joke.
I’ll bet you believe the MSM, too.
So ... have you seen the TV commercials about Camp Lejeune toxic water?
Perhaps - In about 50 years (if mankind is still alive) the lawyers will be touting how new legislation has funded damages for anyone who was forced to get a Covid clot-shot.
Call 1-800-FAUCI if you qualify!!
P
Your link substantiates my comment. No pandemic, no need for vaccinations.
One of these things is not like the other.
Kinda like FReepers and you, bio-lab Vaxway government man.
JimRed wrote: “Two thirds to three quarters of that million were already afflicted with diseases or defects which were on the way to killing them, vaxx or no vaxx.”
Completely irrelevant to the question of swine flu vaccinations.
BTW, most of those people would still be alive, living with their comorbidities, had they not caught covid.
metmom wrote: “Were supposed to believe them when they can’t even keep their story straight for more than a couple months???????”
Why do you believe the covid grifters like Malone, Mercola, Kirsch, etc.?
BTTT
Here you are on a thread where the CDC admits they lied about Covid information and you are on here, presumably in all seriousness, trying to convince everyone that the CDC is a reputable and reliable source of factual information?
What are you smoking?
Whatever you are on, I want some of it next time I need surgery.
bagster wrote: “Bruh, do you ever feel like the last of the vaxhicans?”
Do you ever feel like it’s time to raise your head out of the sand and recognize just how ridiculous your vaccine conspiracy theories are?
BTW, over 68% of the people are fully vaccinated so there are many more of us ‘vaxhicans’ than believers in the covid conspiracy cult theories.
metmom wrote: “Here you are on a thread where the CDC admits they lied about Covid information and you are on here, presumably in all seriousness, trying to convince everyone that the CDC is a reputable and reliable source of factual information?”
Compared to Malone, Mercola, Kirsch, etc., the CDC is a reputable and reliable source for factual information.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled CDC Admits Post-Vaccine Myocarditis Concerns That Were Labeled Covid Misinformation Are Legit, DugwayDuke wrote: mewzilla wrote: “In ‘77 the Swine Flu vax was pulled after causing fewer than three dozen reported deaths and 500 reported injuries. Why is human life worth so much less now?”
The swine flu vaccination program was stopped because there was no swine flu epidemic.
Here's what the CDC says is the primary reason the Swine Flu vax was pulled:
"Had H1N1 influenza been transmitted at that time, the small apparent risk of GBS from immunization would have been eclipsed by the obvious immediate benefit of vaccine-induced protection against swine flu. However, in December 1976, with >40 million persons immunized and no evidence of H1N1 transmission, federal health officials decided that the possibility of an association of GBS with the vaccine, however small, necessitated stopping immunization, at least until the issue could be explored. A moratorium on the use of the influenza vaccines was announced on December 16; it effectively ended NIIP of 1976. Four days later the New York Times published an op-ed article that began by asserting, "Misunderstandings and misconceptions... have marked Government ... during the last eight years," attributing NIIP and its consequences to "political expediency" and "the self interest of government health bureaucracy" (7). These simple and sinister innuendos had traction, as did 2 epithets used in the article to describe the program, "debacle" in the text and "Swine Flu Fiasco" in the title."
The CDC still blames some of its own mistakes on optics and human behavior - claiming the MSM over reported and the public over-reacted.
However, in defending its failures in 2006, the CDC said that overreaction is good when the government does it:
Decision-making Risks
When lives are at stake, it is better to err on the side of overreaction than underreaction. Because of the unpredictability of influenza, responsible public health leaders must be willing to take risks on behalf of the public. This requires personal courage and a reasonable level of understanding by the politicians to whom these public health leaders are accountable. All policy decisions entail risks and benefits: risks or benefits to the decision maker; risks or benefits to those affected by the decision. In 1976, the federal government wisely opted to put protection of the public first.
I'm guessing the CDC is referring to risks to their own careers in this portion of the quote, "Because of the unpredictability of influenza, responsible public health leaders must be willing to take risks on behalf of the public."
For anyone wishing to see further exposure of the CDC's mishandling of the Covid 'vaccine' program, the following content from the CDC re its 1976 mishandling of the Swine Flu 'vaccine' makes for an infuriating read to those quite familiar with the current complaints about the CDC. In it, you can see the CDC was running the same propaganda & experiment-on-the-public game in 1976, and when exposed blamed the same people and claimed to have learned it's lessons, only to repeat some critical ones again with Covid, almost as if...it was intentional, or something.
We know the CDC changes its online content when the public points to it so I've posted the CDC's content to a thread in order to preserve it in its original form.
Reflections on the 1976 Swine Flu Vaccination Program
cdc.gov ^ | January 2006 | CDCPosted on 9/9/2022, 2:52:19 PM by ransomnote
Lastly, the CDC includes as a reference, a New York Times article titled, "Flu to the starboard! Man the harpoons! Fill with vaccine! Get the captain! Hurry! "New York Times. 1976 Feb 13. p. 32, col. 4."
It never was the flu that the New York Times article were hunting with harpoons full of poorly tested 'vaccines'.
PS: For anyone curious, Anthony Fauci joined the CDC in 1968.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Fauci
ransomnote wrote:...
You left out the good part “...and no evidence of H1N1 transmission...”
ransomnote wrote: “It never was the flu that the New York Times article were hunting with harpoons full of poorly tested ‘vaccines’.”
As I said, there was no reason to continue with the vaccinations since there was no epidemic.
You injected it into the swine flu discussion, as a one sentence paragraph.
You are, naturally, distorting the statement made by the CDC which stopped administering the h1n1 'vaccine' until the cause of the GB could be determined.Secondary among its reasons, is the fact that the CDC vaccinated 43 million people with an insufficiently tested vaccine for no reason.
Some folks swim in the River Selfde Nile.
:)
So it IS true. You ARE a government shill, CDC man. No reasonable thinking person would EVER say what you just said.
Why can’t people who lost their children file a class action suit against Big Tech and MSM?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.