Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court to hear appeal of ex-officer in murder of George Floyd
Associated Press ^ | January 18, 2023 | Steve Karnowski

Posted on 01/18/2023 1:30:04 AM PST by Olog-hai

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: Olog-hai

Chauvin is pretty much just a POS who has no business being a cop but I felt like criminal negligence was the appropriate charge. I would have given him 5 years max.


21 posted on 01/18/2023 8:39:10 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Court to hear appeal of ex-officer in murder of George Floyd

Suicide, not murder. The trial Court is a liar.

22 posted on 01/18/2023 8:57:28 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jaysin
As soon as Sir Floyd was no longer a threat, he should have been cuffed and tossed into the cop car (or ambulance if he was OD’ing) but no Chauvin had to have his sunglasses up while playing mr. tough guy with his knees

You sound like someone who doesn't know the facts. Floyd was originally put into the cop car. Floyd then protested he couldn't breath and Floyd started violently kicking the car doors and windows.

They then removed Floyd from the car and laid him down on the street. They then restrained Floyd as they were trained to do.

Floyd died from a drug overdose of Fentanyl. The cop was just in the wrong place at the wrong time. Nothing he did caused Floyd's death, and nothing he could have done would have saved Floyd.

Chauvin's conviction represents a horrible miscarriage of justice. This is clearly a case where mob threats caused the court to give into the mob.

You are too focused on how the cop looked and acted, and you are not focused on the truth. The cop did not kill Floyd. The cop was wrongfully convicted.

23 posted on 01/18/2023 9:03:03 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Flavious_Maximus
I say Chauvin is a classic sadist: a person who derives pleasure, especially sexual gratification, from inflicting pain or humiliation on others.

It always befuddles me why there are so many people who focus on the trivial unimportant aspects of something serious, and completely ignore the significant facts and the ultimate truth.

Chauvin did not kill Floyd. The Conviction is lying bullsh*t and a serious miscarriage of justice. It is a consequence of mob threats and it has no legitimate place in civil society.

Chauvin should not be convicted because Chauvin did not kill Floyd.

Chauvin's attitude or behavior is meaningless when compared to that essential fact.

24 posted on 01/18/2023 9:06:59 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2
Chauvin is pretty much just a POS who has no business being a cop but I felt like criminal negligence was the appropriate charge. I would have given him 5 years max.

For what? What did Chauvin do that you think he needs 5 years in prison?

25 posted on 01/18/2023 9:10:15 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
This is clearly a case where mob threats caused the court to give into the mob.

"Who controls the mob controls the courts." Attributed to Marcus Tullius Cicero

26 posted on 01/18/2023 9:35:47 AM PST by sima_yi ( Reporting live from the far North)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

I think I said criminal negligence but since you didn’t absorb it the first time around let me repeat. Criminal negligence: A defendant who acts in disregard of A serious risk of harm that a reasonable person in the same situation would have perceived. Average sentence 1-3.75 years. I said 5 years max. I would have been fine with the minimum.

Lets face it everyone including me watched the videos of the event ad nauseum. A reasonable person which includes me and apparently a couple of LEOs on scene who questioned Chauvin’s continued kneeling on Floyd’s neck concluded he was at risk of harm.

It wasn’t murder but it wasn’t OK and Chauvinism was deliberately being an ahole. 21 years is insane and I hope he gets a new trial and gets off with time served but he deserved some punishment IMO. I realize you disagree.


27 posted on 01/18/2023 9:43:34 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2
I think I said criminal negligence but since you didn’t absorb it the first time around let me repeat. Criminal negligence: A defendant who acts in disregard of A serious risk of harm that a reasonable person in the same situation would have perceived.

And what did Chauvin disregard that a reasonable person would not have disregarded?

Lets face it everyone including me watched the videos of the event ad nauseum.

I'm pretty sure you are referring to the deliberately spread media propaganda lie that Chauvin was hurting Floyd. The question is, did you see the other videos before the famous media lie video?

The way you are responding to me makes me think you have not seen these videos.

A reasonable person which includes me and apparently a couple of LEOs on scene who questioned Chauvin’s continued kneeling on Floyd’s neck concluded he was at risk of harm.

I ran across a quote the other day that I hadn't seen before.

"The opinion of 10,000 men is of no value if none of them know anything about the subject." -MARCUS AURELIUS (121-180 AD)

Chauvin was not harming Floyd, despite the ignorant opinions of the other rookie officers present, and despite the opinions of all the video watching people who were unfamiliar with the technique.

The particular technique Chauvin was using was *TAUGHT* to the members of that police department during their academy training. It is illustrated in their teaching material. It was department approved and considered by that department to be a valid method of restraining someone.

Chauvin's bad looking restraining technique caused no harm to Floyd. Floyd died of a drug overdose.

It wasn’t murder but it wasn’t OK and Chauvinism was deliberately being an ahole.

Many people have said so, but after I learned more of the facts surrounding what Chauvin did, I am not so sure.

21 years is insane and I hope he gets a new trial and gets off with time served but he deserved some punishment IMO. I realize you disagree.

Well of course I disagree. What I learned informed me that what they show you and what is the truth is often not the same thing at all.

What exactly did Chauvin do that caused harm to Floyd? It wasn't the knee on his back or shoulder. There have been freepers that have said they had someone put their knee on their necks and it caused no harm to them.

If you are going to put a man in prison for 5 years, and effectively destroy his entire life as a consequence of that, you should have very very good and provable reasons that the man did something illegal.

I have seen no such proof regarding Chauvin. I've seen a mob rush to judgement.

28 posted on 01/18/2023 10:14:05 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

Like I said even other LEOs were uncomfortable with Chauvin’s actions and they were standing right there on scene. Not watching from their recliner.

Lets face it all Chauvin had to do was cuff Floyd behind his back and prop him up Sitting against a patrol car. In his condition no way is he standing up unassisted. Then when Floyd died at some point further down the custody chain Chauvin would still be a cop. Like I said criminal negligence.


29 posted on 01/18/2023 10:27:13 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: TallahasseeConservative

Among Floyd’s complaints was that he had taken fentanyl anally to accelerate its effects.

He used some “street term” common among druggies.


30 posted on 01/18/2023 11:01:28 AM PST by Does so (This way, the swamp can take out Trump in 2024 AND Biden forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

See above...


31 posted on 01/18/2023 11:04:55 AM PST by Does so (This way, the swamp can take out Trump in 2024 AND Biden forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2
Like I said even other LEOs were uncomfortable with Chauvin’s actions and they were standing right there on scene.

You mean all the other rookies he was training at the time? Yeah, I can see how a rookie would be uncomfortable when law enforcement has to do some rough work.

Not watching from their recliner.

I don't own a recliner, but I don't think a recliner is relevant to whether or not someone can research the facts and arrive at the truth.

Lets face it all Chauvin had to do was cuff Floyd behind his back and prop him up Sitting against a patrol car.

No he couldn't. That wasn't Departmental procedure. Floyd had exhibited violence and he was clearly under the influence of some drug. Holding him till medics arrived is what Chauvin was supposed to do, but thanks to the crowd of people looking for racism, the medics had to park a distance away and walk to the scene.

Then when Floyd died at some point further down the custody chain Chauvin would still be a cop. Like I said criminal negligence.

You still don't seem to have bothered to learn all the facts before deciding the Cop needs to go to jail. You have rushed to judgement.

32 posted on 01/18/2023 12:40:14 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson