Posted on 09/01/2023 9:40:02 PM PDT by ransomnote
I couldn’t spot the part where Ed tells us about his background in assessing “Accelerating Vax Deaths & Disabilities” so that we, too, can be alarmed.
But maybe that’s part of portfolio managing at Blackrock, who knows. I thought they just spent most of their time buying up all of the single family homes in SoCal.
“Historical Perspectives on Sudden Deaths in Young Athletes With Evolution over 35 Years”
The American Journal of Cardiology 2015 Nov 1
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26394831/
Sudden death in young competitive athletes has become a highly visible and substantial issue within cardiovascular medicine of interest both to the general public and to the practicing community. At this time, it is instructive to revisit the evolution of this clinical problem over the past 35 years starting with introduction into the public and medical consciousness by the unexpected sudden deaths of 2 college basketball players within 8 weeks of each other in 1976, 1 with Marfan syndrome and the other with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Subsequently, over the next years, a number of elite athletes died suddenly, raising public visibility and awareness of these tragic events: Len Bias, “Pistol” Pete Maravich, Hank Gathers, Reggie Lewis, Kori Stringer, Jason Collier, and Thomas Herrion.
Intense interest in these and many other athlete deaths has led to a considerable understanding regarding the demographics, incidence, and causes of these deaths, which include a variety of genetic and/or congenital cardiovascular diseases (most commonly hypertrophic cardiomyopathy), blunt trauma, commotio cordis, and sickle cell trait.
Ultimately, initiatives emerged creating consensus guidelines for disqualification versus eligibility decisions, and preparticipation screening to detect unsuspected cardiac abnormalities. This journey of now >3 decades has generated voluminous data and even controversy, but continues to hold great interest in clinical scientists, medical practitioners, and the general public.
“I see BigPharma is still compensating their lowlife shills. Not suprised.”
I see the usual cabal of paranoids spreading one of their favorite falsehoods. Also not surprised.
Ha! Busted yourself, $$.
Nice work.
(Not as profitable as BigPharma work, tho.)
Now, do tell us, all, exactly what “falsehood” was in my post, that you replied to ME.
One observes that Pelham has managed to comment nine times in 43 comments, including to you. Seems he is THE expert and a debunker par excellence, who sets himself (or herself) as judge and jury. Such behavior teaches that he is not an interlocutor to be further engaged, as I see it.
Description of a typical $hill troll ;-)
09/01/2023 12:02:02 PM PDT · by RaceBannon · 22 replies
PROTEOMICS – Clinical ApplicationsEarly View ^ | aug 15, 2023 | CarloBrogna1SimoneCristoni2GiulianoMarino3LuigiMontano4ValentinaViduto5MarkFabrowski6GennaroLettieri
AbstractPurpose: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic prompted the development and use of next-generation vaccines. Among these,mRNA-based vaccines consist of injectable solutions of mRNA encoding for are combinant Spike, which is distinguishable from the wild-type protein due to specific amino acid variations introduced to maintain the protein in a prefused state.This work presents a proteomic approach to reveal the presence of recombinant Spike protein in vaccinated subjects regardless of antibody titer...
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4179486/posts
01/07/2023 11:08:08 PM PST · by libh8er · 25 replies
News Medical/ Life Sciences ^ | 1.5.2023 | Liji Thomas
Introduction The development of myocarditis following mRNA vaccination is rare, occurring in < 2 per 100,000 individuals. It remains an unpredictable mysterious occurrence. Some have suggested that it is linked to the overproduction of antibodies or abnormal immune responses. Autoantibody production due to polyclonal B cell activation and proliferation has also been suggested, as has immune complex formation and inflammation. Finally, some think that cardiac antigens closely resembling the spike protein are targeted by autoantibodies formed as a result of molecular mimicry. The immune response to these vaccines in these patients needs to be better understood in order to determine...
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4121713/posts
And...
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/prca.202300048
Hence the switch to IGg4. Teaching the immune system to down regulate the immune system. The governments are going to have to sacrifice Moderna and Phizer eventually. It’s their only play for survival.
Within normal variation for the previous decade and not statistically significant. After 2021, the variation was in the five-sigma range. Something big happened. Was it COVID? To be sure, that was a contributing factor. Was it the mRNA treatment? That is the 64 (trillion) dollar question.
It should be easy to answer that question. But the question is not allowed. And the data which would answer that question is not being collected by the Government. But it is being collected in small-scale amounts which are still large enough to provide confident answers.
Government officials do not want that question answered. Insurance company executives must have that question answered - but they don't need to publicize the answers. They only need to adapt their rates to the new circumstances and wrest various concession from the Government that will allow them to do so.
Government officials can lie without penalties, in order to protect themselves and their organizations. Corporate executives find this much harder to do. They must make profits on their operations and cannot afford to believe official propaganda. Unless they are paid to do that.
Moderna and Pfizer got paid handsomely. Both companies were on the verge of bankruptcy until the mRNA mandates came along. The other members of the coalition (J&J, AstraZeneca, Novavax) have also done quite well.
That’s how the CDC could see that there was a new respiratory disease circulating and it’s how they could get an estimate of its impact..
I do not believe that for one second.
What I do believe:
CDC was told about the outbreak and instructed to come up with "reasons".
Public officials in the USA were already aware of the COVID outbreak by January 2020. And how do we know this? Because Fauci oversaw 6.5 million dollars in funding to the Wuhan lab to continue gain-of-function research which had been refused and abandoned by US and Canadian organizations as too dangerous to continue. Fauci bought access to all of the Chinese results from that work. Presumably, he got scheduled progress reports. But just maybe the Chinese were not entirely forthcoming about everything they were doing.
Fauci and his associates knew there had been a serious "oops" in the Wuhan lab in September 2019. It was not the first one either. And then there was that mid-level Chinese defector the NSA trotted out a while later who basically outlined this whole story. The NSA probably has intercepted e-mails and phone calls from the Chinese officials at Wuhan which confirm the story.
I expect there are factions within the government who are not entirely supportive of the COVID program. Leaking negative information through fringe channels to disrupt rival factions is a time-honored tactic in the bureaucracy.
Always Pavlovian in your response, eh?
On the 187 days, it was the cut off for the six month review this group did.
We know the claim in the study is a minimum of 187 days—there was no upper limit yet found for those affected.
None should be producing anything spike related at that point, so anyone producing anything is just bizarre.
Gene therapy includes foreign gene expression.
Also
There is evidence the the DNA plasmid used in the mRNA synthesis for the Jabs is stable and present in high enough concentrations in the jabs to be the method for continuous spike protein production.
Ooops…
This is in the documents that pFizer wanted to keep secret for 75 years…
The JnJ gene therapy vaccine used an adenovirus vector, for its gene therapy approach.
This is well established terminology!
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4507798/
Even by your friend Fauci’s NIH…
Once again, the Bible has the answer. It’s in Psalms. “Put not your trust in princes.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.