Posted on 10/06/2023 8:51:05 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Article said they refused to bring charges against Trump.
“ By refusing to bring charges against Trump that could also be brought against the presidents they like…”
Read again. They refused to bring charges for the TYPES OF THINGS OTHER PRESIDENTS DID. The charges they have brought were things they believe they could single Trump out for.
That’s the other problem with this article.
It is saying Trump committed crimes he could or should be prosecuted for.
It is saying almost all recent presidents have committed crimes, and that Trump is being singled out.
There are so many crimes on the Federal register now that virtually no one can avoid committing crimes daily. It’s a matter of selective prosecution here.
These crimes it cites are leftist antifa mantra that any military action by the US is a crime.
The article is all over the place.
Yes, they are persecuting Trump, others get a pass.
I’m just commenting on this article making no sense.
Made perfect sense to me.
Takes all kinds.
What crimes are you claiming Trump committed?
I am not claiming anything. You are claiming that you must be 99% RIGHT that the article is 90% WRONG.
I’m saying that the article is speaking of the many gray areas resulting from decades-long corruption of our laws and policies that the DOJ is taking one-sided advantage of.
And thst concludes this discussion.
“ I’m saying that the article is speaking of the many gray areas resulting from decades-long corruption of our laws and policies that the DOJ is taking one-sided advantage of.”
We’ve established we agree on that.
I’m addressing the article premise that Trump committed crimes.
I don’t agree.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.