Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russian Media Scrambles to Bury Putin's Tucker Carlson Interview Gaffes
Newsweek ^ | 12/12/2024 | Brendan Cole

Posted on 02/12/2024 7:40:53 AM PST by marcusmaximus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: ought-six

yup already corrected the date


41 posted on 02/12/2024 9:16:43 AM PST by Owen (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

They were not ‘gaffes’. Putin spoke his mind and said what he intended to say.


42 posted on 02/12/2024 9:20:24 AM PST by MeganC (Ruzzians aren't people. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dforest; House Atreides; aMorePerfectUnion

I saw a Zeeper complaining earlier about sources that make FR look like “DU Light,” but their own members post crap like this day in and day out and they seem quite OK with that.

Zeepers. 🙄


43 posted on 02/12/2024 9:22:59 AM PST by Allegra (Less propaganda would be appreciated. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

A woman walks into a Moscow food store. “Do you have any meat?”

“No, we don’t.”

“What about eggs?”

“We only deal with meat. Across the street there is the store where they have no eggs.”


44 posted on 02/12/2024 9:24:46 AM PST by MeganC (Ruzzians aren't people. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

Yeah. They forgot to remove the Ukraine flag from their post, like they would usually do when pretending to be something else.


45 posted on 02/12/2024 9:28:10 AM PST by Tench_Coxe (The woke were surprised by the reaction to the Bud Light fiasco. May there be many more surprises)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: dforest

That was excellent. Thanks for posting.


46 posted on 02/12/2024 9:33:31 AM PST by Jonny7797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Owen
Again with the Soviet disinfo; Yes, the Krauts lost big time at Stalingrad (and Moscow and Leningrad and Kharkov) but the Germans lost hundreds of thousands in North Africa, Sicily, Italy and France. Despite your warbling about how wonderful the Soviet victory was in Stalingrad, the Krauts still had a quarter million troops - their best - available for his last throw of the dice through Belgium and Luxembourg.

Not to mention the enormous effects of the relentless day and night bombing by the Eight Air Force and RAF Bomber Command which eviscerated German production capabilities.

Cute reference to the Waffen SS's capabilities - which was by that latter stage of the war, effective, well-equipped and brutal.

The only reason the Soviets took Berlin was because the Western Allies had agreed to hold back so the Soviets would given priority to take Berlin. Patton pushed for our forces to take Berlin before the Soviets got there but was overruled.

Got a great job with TASS, do you?

47 posted on 02/12/2024 9:39:39 AM PST by Chainmail (How do I feel about ignorance and apathy? I don't know and I don't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Chainmail

Khrushchev said that Stalin told him that without Lend-Lease from Britain and the US, there was no way the Soviets would have been able to repel the Germans.


48 posted on 02/12/2024 9:40:58 AM PST by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: MeganC

Ah yes... Like that standard Russian saying: “We pretend to work and they pretend to pay us”


49 posted on 02/12/2024 9:42:16 AM PST by Chainmail (How do I feel about ignorance and apathy? I don't know and I don't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
"...there was no way the Soviets would have been able to repel the Germans."

True that: we sent Bell P-39 Airacobras (tank busters extraordinaire), C-47s and B-25s - but most importantly, lots and lots of trucks. If those trucks didn't make it (we lost hundreds of thousands of tons of shipping and thousands of merchant seamen trying to reach Murmansk) they would not have had anything to tow artillery or transport troops and supplies. The Germans used horses (!) and the Soviets used American trucks.

50 posted on 02/12/2024 9:48:42 AM PST by Chainmail (How do I feel about ignorance and apathy? I don't know and I don't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

When going with propaganda, you go big.

The essence of propaganda consists in winning people over to an idea so sincerely, so vitally, that in the end they succumb to it utterly and can never escape from it. - Joseph Goebbels

This is the secret of propaganda: Those who are to be persuaded by it should be completely immersed in the ideas of the propaganda, without ever noticing that they are being immersed in it. - Joseph Goebbels


51 posted on 02/12/2024 9:51:05 AM PST by FlyingEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeganC

52 posted on 02/12/2024 9:51:23 AM PST by kiryandil (Free Zaluzhny!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: FlyingEagle

The essence of propaganda consists in winning people over to an idea so sincerely, so vitally, that in the end they succumb to it utterly and can never escape from it. - Joseph Goebbels


Josef learned from George Creel, who sold Americans on entering WWI.


53 posted on 02/12/2024 9:52:11 AM PST by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Khrushchev said that Stalin told him that without Lend-Lease from Britain and the US, there was no way the Soviets would have been able to repel the Germans.

Absolutely true. Stalin couldn't even FEED his army. The US supplied shiploads of Spam, via a railway specially built across Iran from the Persian Gulf. Fat lot of gratitude it got us.

The book is "Feeding the Bear", now sadly out of print, (and I loaned mine out years ago and never got it back).

54 posted on 02/12/2024 10:03:20 AM PST by Chad C. Mulligan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Chainmail

Stick to numbers. Numbers are truth.

250,000 troops. “The Best” is not numbers.

The Germans lost 400,000 at Stalingrad and another 150K at Moscow. The Hungarian, Italian and Romanian totals exceeded the German number at Stalingrad.

Numbers, only numbers. Interpretations are ephemeral.

Holding back is words. Not numbers. Soviet numbers in Berlin exceeded the US and UK and whoever.

Bombing is talked of. The only bombing of significance must necessarily talk about oil, which is everything. Ploesti oil fields in Romania were bombed over and over at enormous Allied loss. And restored over and over.

Scroll down to the bottom of this presentation of bombing vs oil production. It is loaded with numbers, which tell a tale of failure.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_campaign_of_World_War_II


55 posted on 02/12/2024 10:10:34 AM PST by Owen (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Owen
Well, "Owen", while we're talking numbers, how many Soviets - combatants and noncombatants died - during their part of the war? And again, numbers, how many U-Boats were sunk by the USSR during WWII? And, how many long-range bombers did the USSR have available?

The real truth is that the Soviet Union would part of Greater Germany today if the Western Allies hadn't fought to keep the seaways open, fought to defeat German forces on Africa, Sicily, Italy and France, fought to gain air supremacy over Germany, fought to get the Soviets lend-lease support (primarily trucks).

The truth is, that even if the Soviets just held the German Wehrmacht in place in 1943, the West would have still defeated the Germans because the Germans could never hope to match our production volume, our high quality aircraft, artillery, and steadily improving antiarmor weapons.

Had the Germans lasted longer that August 1945, we would have nuked Berlin - as had been originally planned.

The Soviet tactics wasted lives and would never have succeeded without massive and generous Western support and skilled combatants.

Put(in) that in your pipe and smoke it!

56 posted on 02/12/2024 10:37:15 AM PST by Chainmail (How do I feel about ignorance and apathy? I don't know and I don't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Chainmail

I will give the Soviets credit for the T-34.

A German general who saw it for the first time during the early days of Barbarossa said, that if the Soviet could mass produce it, Germany would lose the war.


57 posted on 02/12/2024 10:39:14 AM PST by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
The T-34 was an excellent tank (with the US-developed Christie Suspension), made better yet when they introduced the 85mm main gun.

The Germans were unable to attack their tank factories in the Urals because they didn't produce the long-range bombers to make those attacks.

We stuck with the Sherman but it was the numbers and the poor hapless tank crews who took on the panzers and defeated them. Things didn't improve until the Brits fielded their Firefly version with its excellent 17-pounder Tiger-killer gun and the US "Easy 8" and its 76mm gun with its superior AP projectile (when they could get them).

58 posted on 02/12/2024 10:50:07 AM PST by Chainmail (How do I feel about ignorance and apathy? I don't know and I don't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Chainmail

Quote numbers, specifically in rebuttal to raw numbers I have provided or you are just quoting imagined history books.

Numbers. About oil.

Study. It will do you good.


59 posted on 02/12/2024 11:49:34 AM PST by Owen (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Owen

They must pay you well for churning out Comintern propaganda.

I am well aware of the meat grinder the Eastern Front became - but the truth is that the Soviets would have lost if the Western Allies hadn’t done their part.

Pull away from your tattered Izvestia reading list and read about our contributions to defeating the Nazis (and the Japanese).

Now - answer the questions posed in my last post - we had two nuclear weapons ready to go in August 1945: why did the Russians have to waste their soldier’s lives in idiotic frontal attacks?


60 posted on 02/12/2024 12:03:40 PM PST by Chainmail (How do I feel about ignorance and apathy? I don't know and I don't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson