Posted on 11/03/2013 2:44:24 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
He's an advocate of small tyranny.
Wish he’d go away and take McCain with him.
Go away, loser.
Mitt needs to go back to whatever it was he has been doing since the 2012 election results came out. We’ve got this Mitt!
Romney: “I could have done socialism better.”
Which is probably true.
Mittens needs to shut up and go home. He and McCain can play Canasta.
You know Obama was lying during the election. You chose to keep your mouth shut. So don’t come around now calling “liar”. We needed you a year ago. We don’t need you now.
I wish this lying sack of crap would be jailed or deported back to Mexico. Everything Obama is doing to us, he learned from Romney.
I'm not MItt guy, and I don't think Romney Care is a good idea or ever was
.but our Founders professed a profound difference in local versus centralized Federal govermmnet
.
Amen brother.
To hell with all RINOs. Cruz control to 2016. Drink hot Tea commies.
Me neither. But I voted for him anyway.
I voted against Obama, not for Mitt.
Go away, Mutt!
Ditto.
Oh I did too .for all of Mitt’s many many faults I don’t think he had any interest in doing Obamacare for the entire nation. For all the talk about the “similarities” - there are many more differences. Going from one tiny somewhat homogenous state to a massive country can not be translated in any similar manner whatsoever .
Yes, point taken .
“I’m not MItt guy, and I don’t think Romney Care is a good idea or ever was .but our Founders professed a profound difference in local versus centralized Federal govermmnet .”
You are right about that. If a state wanted to implement a system like this then fine, do so. I may not like it but I could move. When the law becomes national that move becomes more problematic.
The issue with Obamacare is that it is a bad law - even if it worked it would still be a bad law. This is a difficult argument to make to leftist at times but I feel I must try at least occasionally to do so. People should not be against the law because it is implemented poorly; they should be against it because it is intrusive, violates the right of association, is a power not specifically vested in the Federal government and thus a state issue, it seems to me it potentially violates the interstate commerce clause, is a tax bill that did not originate in the house and probably several other issues that I am leaving out. The fact that it does not work is almost beside the point though is helpful in getting rid of the law.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.