Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP Urges Investigation of Voting Machine Performance
ABC News ^ | January 10, 2004

Posted on 01/12/2004 4:54:35 PM PST by GregD

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-202 next last
To: GregD
OUCH.
That's almost like the State of NJ with the question of whether or not to preserve or tear down a certain historic building.
The one estimate was 2 mill to not only preserve it, but make it usable as office space, which was needed for the Park Service.
Well, NJ spent 11.2 million to tear the building down.
They then turned around and asked for an office building to be built, of the exact same square footage of usable office space of the building they just tore down.

Hope I'm making sense.
I was up way early this morning and am dragging..
61 posted on 01/12/2004 7:08:59 PM PST by Darksheare ("The voices in my head think the voices in your head are paranoid")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Mark
Mark, if we had a system like that then every shop steward would try to collect union member's reciepts to assure correct voting. And if everyone in your shop is doing it, it will be hard for you not to, especially if the puppy chewed it up every election.
62 posted on 01/12/2004 7:14:07 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GregD
Sounds to me like there is a whopping piece of pie here for independent consultants and consulting firms to get these civil folks set up.

I see an opportunity...
63 posted on 01/12/2004 7:15:48 PM PST by antaresequity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: DBrow
An ideal system would print out a receipt with a confirmation of how the voter just entered his vote. This receipt could be deposited into a locked box at the polling place.

There would then be a hard copy available for verification or for the actual vote count if the electronic system fails

64 posted on 01/12/2004 7:18:32 PM PST by Vermonter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: GregD
Electronic systems must have a paper trail- otherwise fraud is way too easy.

If the 5K$ machine spits out a punched card with your choices on it for your review, then you stick that in a traditional turn-the-crank voting machine, then there is a hope for independent confirmation. But what takes precedence if there is a conflict? The server HD will give the same tally exactly every single time, while the cards will vary slightly.

I think the old way, mark an X with a pencil and have sworn people count them while being watched by sworn people, is the best even if it is cumbersome. This limits cheating to limited areas and requires many people to be silent if there is fraud.

Most problems have arisen from mechanized voting. Way back, some people would reach around behind the voting machine, untwist the seal wire, and press the "clear counter" lever (mechanical counter on a rachet). Now what do you do? Those votes are gone!
65 posted on 01/12/2004 7:20:38 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermonter
So if I had the tearoff reciept I could request to see the punchcard the machine printed out for me? The card would help a recount, but if you inspect the card at the polling place and you goofed or the machine shpongled your vote, you would get it fixed before authenticating your vote.

If someone defrauded the system somewhere, being able to verify what is on any individual ballot would not be particularly useful information for a voter- it would say how you voted, and you already checked that when you pushed "Verify" or "Go" or whatever.
66 posted on 01/12/2004 7:27:27 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Revel
"have the votes counted by two diferent software programs running simutaneoulsy"

That is a proposal I could easily stand behind, if we could gain concensus from the citizen activists and legislators to embrace it.

I'll counter your suggestion by asking that you come to our site, engage in direct volunteerism, and help us form a combination of thoughts that can be passed into law.

I figure we have until late February to get these bills passed. If they are passed later, it is unlikely that the effective dates will be before Nov 2004. HR2239 and S1980 need to get passed, and when they go to conference, there will be changes negotiated. Interested and informed parties need to band together and submit proposed improvements that get rolled into the bills before their final passage (assuming we can influence this.)

Regardless of who wins in November, remember what Florida 2000 did in terms of how it strained the Nation. These paperless systems could result in such disasters nationwide. I don't look forward to that, and I doubt anyone else does. Please help us get these laws passed early in the new session.

If this issue is important to you, please join us.

67 posted on 01/12/2004 7:29:07 PM PST by GregD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: GregD
The user selects his values, submits them, is given a chance to verify them, and they are recorded on a data base.

At the same time a scantron quality receipt is submitted in triplicate. One for the voter, one for a mutually selected independent master to verify on classic scantron equipment, and the third to be kept by the vote tally folks.

This still doesn't verify that what's printed on the receipt is what was stored on the hard drive or other data base. Anything without a verifiable audit trail, preferably a paper trail, is out as far as I'm concerned.

My wife and I will vote absentee from now on. At least those ballots are on paper.

68 posted on 01/12/2004 7:29:34 PM PST by JoeFromSidney (All political power grows from the barrel of a gun. -- Mao Zedong. That's why the 2nd Amendment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GregD
134 votes were not counted by the touchscreen machines.

The reason they were not counted was because these 134 voters didn't push the Vote button when they were done.

69 posted on 01/12/2004 7:33:39 PM PST by Kaslin ("The way to dishonor a fallen soldier is to quit too early." President George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBrow
No, I'm talking about having a paper copy of your electronic vote in a locked box at the polling place. You would verify that the paper copy matched your intended vote and the hard copy would be available for a hand recount if the electronics failed or were questioned
70 posted on 01/12/2004 7:56:01 PM PST by Vermonter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: GregD
When the elite media didn't question paperless scanners, some suspected democrats didn't want the issue questioned. Vote fraud has, for the past 50 years, been done almost exclusively by democrats. Scanners make cheating easier.

Our vote is more valuable than any of those things, and do the machines print anything that allows verification of our votes? Nope, sorry – don’t think so… What? And with no audit trail, be that paper or whatever other technology might be is verifiable in the future, there is no means of verifying the results of an election. If the computer malfunctions, we can’t prove it. If a bug creeps in, we won’t know. Can we do a recount? Absolutely not – all we can do is re-print the same totals that were questioned in the first place.

71 posted on 01/12/2004 8:02:51 PM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: torchthemummy
Thank you for your kindness. The truth is, whoever "cheated more" really does not enter into this issue, does it? You didn't do it, I didn't do it, and it is unlikely that anyone either of us personally know was responsible for it.

Q: Who's government is it?
A: It is our government.

Q: Who's responsibility if our "leaders" fail to observe the laws of our land, if other "leaders" fail to force those offenders to uphold the law, or if legislation is created that is not for our common benefit?
A: Personally, I feel that if we wish to live in a country that respects the laws of civil behaviour (including election law), then we need to personally step forward and help "convince" those leaders that only ethical behaviour is acceptible, regardless of party affiliation. If there is a breakdown on either side, it simply motivates others to see that as clearance to act in kind. And by my own efforts, I am making a stand and saying "I DEMAND FAIRLY COUNTED ELECTIONS!"

I seek those of you who agree to join me in passion and mutual determination.

Helping to lead this effort means I spend a lot of time on the phone with volunteers, managing the web site, and other activities (like occasionally sleeping). It also means that I do not spend a lot of time reading and posting to sites, and it is unlikely that you will see me spend a lot of time here (assuming I don't get zotted as you mentioned), and that I remain welcome to post. (If you seek my input, I am easily reached through the web site.)

With that said, I really need people to take a leadership role in this community, with regard to the electronic voting issue. I put in a bit of time in DU trying to lead activism, and make a sincere effort to not apply any partisan slant over there. I use the same screen name if you need to find me. But there are far fewer hours available than are necessary to do this work.

I need help from you who frequent this board, and who care about this issue. We are up against HUGE corporations with way more financial resources than we do, and from past experience they seem uninclined to add the paper trail - we all need to work together to force that change. And to date, the media is doing a mediocre job of covering the issue. CBS covered the breakdown in Virginia (link on my site), but we need more coverage. And until that happens, it means we have to work harder to get the word out. Please, if this is important to you, keep this issue active here in Free Republic. Tell everyone you know, and help us get the bills passed.

If you are in California, there is a critical meeting on Thursday Jan 15 where the next phase of the audit results will be revealed. Sacramento, Sec. of State office, 10AM. I would like to meet you there.

72 posted on 01/12/2004 8:06:01 PM PST by GregD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: lepton
"The text of H.R. 2239 and its details are here"

Are you talking about the link from the DHTML flyout menu? That is supposed to open a new browser to the Thomas web site. I keep having trouble with that link for some reason. Thanks for pointing it out.

Another link to that page is here:
http://www.verifiedvoting.org/fair_elections.asp

73 posted on 01/12/2004 8:10:42 PM PST by GregD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: GregD
Thanks for the post and welcome. Great topic.
74 posted on 01/12/2004 8:13:47 PM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
"Call me a cynic Greg, but you appear too sincere, polite, and bright to be a Democrat. Exactly what are you trying to pull?? "

-------------------------

In my opinion, the internet and these anonymous message boards (Yahoo for example) has allowed for a fundamental breakdown in social conduct to become the norm. That has been further decayed by the bitter partisan politics that exist in the US today.

If we were sitting in a restaurant, a theater, or a camp site - how would we conduct ourselves? Would be explode into bitter accusations? I know I do not!

We have too much at stake to permit impolite behaviour to impact this issue. We are talking about the core of our democracy - the right to really believe that voting matters. Each American has the right to express their political viewpoints, to elect those who (we perceive to) reflect our personal values, and then we expect those leaders to conduct themselves in our best interests. I need YOUR help to assure that our confidence in those RIGHTS are maintained.

As for zombies, cadavers voting in one district or another, Democrat or Republican - it all has to be cleaned up. As I mentioned in another post above, this whole system is a mess. When we get this problem solved, the next thing to do is to get corporate financing out of our elections. Who the hell invited anyone to corrupt the system, and drive the legislative process based on special interest multi-million dollar donations to campaigns? We need to work together to fix all this stuff. I'm in my 50's, been voting for horrible candidates all my life, and it is time we citizens take back our elections and run things cleanly. You with me?

-------------------------------------

One more point. I have (had) a successful web development business before this issue came to my attention. Ellen, another member on our team, earned her living as a self-employed technical writer. Neither of us market our business services any longer, and turn down work regularly. We are each working for free, and living off of our savings. If someone (new or current client) calls about web work, I talk to them about electronic voting. I do that at the risk that I may lose the business.

I am not going to take that level of risk, or make that type of commitment, then come here in any other manner than pure sincerity. I need your help. America needs OUR help!

Please join us today in this important work.

www.verifiedvoting.org

75 posted on 01/12/2004 8:32:57 PM PST by GregD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
Dude, I didn't come here to debate election steals in the past, and I'm the last to defend anyone who has done that.

Frankly, I didn't really follow politics that closely before the past few years, and that is unfortunate. We should all have held the respective parties and candidates at a higher level of ethics.

Want to talk about how to get the paper trail on the voting machines, or proceed with "business as usual and getting worse all the time"?

If you want to talk about military votes, then the next problem to solve is SERVE. That is an experiment regarding Internet voting which will be used for the military. Hell, they can't keep the most secure sites from being hacked, and www.votehere.com (who was hacked in October) is trying to get that business.

76 posted on 01/12/2004 8:41:58 PM PST by GregD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: GregD
"The text of H.R. 2239 and its details are here"

My goof. I was on http://www.verifiedvoting.org/fair_elections.asp and hit the link to the text. The next link I wanted was just off-screen. :)

77 posted on 01/12/2004 8:46:16 PM PST by lepton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
You are making complete sense. What a stupid freaking idea - I hate that sort of abuse.

Ya know, there are a lot of folks on the "left" that see many things in a similar manner to the "right". I don't want "big government" - I want "ethical government" that "spends wisely" and "conducts wise investment and planning for the future". I doubt that is hard to disagree with.

The problem, IMO, is that these turds that get elected and are then corrupted by campaign contributors proceed to make decisions that NONE of us would endorse if we had the ability to influence those decisions.

(laughing) Imagine if WE had a line-item veto which WE would vote on and take the crap out of the bills they pass... That would certainly straighten a few things out.

78 posted on 01/12/2004 8:47:56 PM PST by GregD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Vermonter
That is EXACTLY what HR2239 / S1980 will offer.

Go look and see what happened already in VA and FL, in the absence of a paper trail. I have those stories linked from the front page of www.verifiedvoting.org - Do we want this happening all over the country, for either side, in November

Help us get those bills passed into law so we don't have another meltdown in November.

79 posted on 01/12/2004 8:52:18 PM PST by GregD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: JoeFromSidney
My wife and I will vote absentee from now on. At least those ballots are on paper.

Assuming they bother to count them...which often they don't.

80 posted on 01/12/2004 8:53:43 PM PST by lepton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-202 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson