California Attorney General Bill Lockyer, who was viciously tenacious in his enforcement of anti-assault weapon laws to the extent that he sponsored public service announcements telling owners of the weapons that they were risking immediate imprisonment, was informed that the mayor of San Francisco was going to deliberately violate California code, and wasn't available for comment when it all began.
I am not a lawyer, but there has to be some sort of statute that pertains to dereliction of duty by the state Attorney General.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
To: L.N. Smithee
actually if it can be proven he hid to facilitate a criminal act, he will loose his law license. (and office.)
To: L.N. Smithee
"When three or more parties conspire to carry on an on
going criminal enterprise and/or conspiracy, it can fall under the RICCO Act. ..."
"They called the offices of Pelosi and U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein. They alerted Secretary of State Kevin Shelley, state Attorney General Bill Lockyer, the city's two gay supervisors, Tom Ammiano and Bevan Dufty, and national Democrat Committee chairman Terry McAuliffe. "
I believe federal law has been violated.
To: L.N. Smithee
BTTT !!
59 posted on
02/17/2004 2:10:23 AM PST by
davidosborne
(www.davidosborne.net)
To: L.N. Smithee
62 posted on
02/17/2004 6:14:11 AM PST by
yoe
(WMD come in small containers/vials...small minds don't want you to know that.)
To: L.N. Smithee
For class reading...thanks.
63 posted on
02/17/2004 6:57:24 AM PST by
Van Jenerette
(Our Republic...If we can keep it!)
To: L.N. Smithee
This was a conspiracy by the Mayor of San Francisco, the Judicial and Executive branches of the California government against the 'tyrannical majority' of that State.
To: L.N. Smithee
Lockyer should be recalled.
82 posted on
02/17/2004 11:52:15 AM PST by
B Knotts
(Deport Arnold!)
To: L.N. Smithee
If this was the "right thing to do", why did they have to look at the "political consequences"? And if this were a true act of "civil disobedience", in the manner of Ghandi or MLK, why did they have to consider the "legal consequences"? What these phonies really did was to determine if they could "get away with it". They knew that Ahnold (in his "uniter, not a divider" mode) would be loathe to do anything, and they had the AG in their hip pocket.
To: L.N. Smithee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson