Massachusetts burning: 'Gay marriage' leads to incest

WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Friday, March 26, 2004 | Kevin McCullough

[JohnHuang2]

Friday, March 26, 2004

Quote of the Day by kennedy

[Dataman]

That doesn't even make sense.

It makes sense that it doesn't make sense because it happened in MA.

[Argus]

Great comeback. Great cartoons too.

[mrustow]

The only shortcoming of this article, is its regurgitation of the GOP talking point re "relativism" (young Zeiger's favorite line). These people aren't moral relativists; they just use moral relativism as a tactic, in order to destroy institutions. (If they were really relativists, they wouldn't idealize their own positions.) The hackery behind the "moral relativism" talking point obscures the truth, which does not help us fight the barbarians within the gates.

[theDentist]

The real twist is that the Boston Globe thinks that the Mass. Supreme Court is "conservative".

[breakem]

your headline is not logical. It seems based upon an adult having sex with 15 and 16 year olds, which is illegal under statuatory laws. How is have sex with a non-blood step-parent incest? It may be icky ala Woody Allen, but incest?

Children have not been able to legally enter into legal contracts in the states. The instance of adult incest is rare to the point that it has been very difficult to have enough samples to condut good research.

Could you explain how homo-marriage will lead to any more incest than we have now?

[breakem]

should read instances of adult-adult incest is rare.

[lilylangtree]

Sickos!

[Marauder]

Was the man only charged with incest and not statutory rape?

[Modernman]

Was the man only charged with incest and not statutory rape?

That's my question, too. If the incest statute does not cover sex between a step-parent and step-child, but only deals with blood relations and sex between a parent and their adopted child, then the Court ruled correctly.

If the prosecutor did not charge the guy with statutory rape, he really screwed the pooch on this one.

[mvpel]

Can't they nail the step-dad for statutory rape? What's the age of consent in Fascistchusetts?

[MegaSilver]

It is what this and the ruling on homosexual marriage represent that is the problem: a gradual shift away from VERY IMPORTANT sexual taboos. NAMBLA or some other sick group could very well exploit it to push the limits even further. While there are many nice gay people, the infrastructure of the gay community as a whole is relentlessly perverse, and there is very little that I would put past it.

Also, I take issue with your contention that having intercourse with a non-blood step-parent might not be considered incest. What about intercourse with a non-blood, adoptive parent? Is that not incest?

[Capt. Tom]

The real twist is that the Boston Globe thinks that the Mass. Supreme Court is "conservative

It is.
Otherwise Judge Marshall wouldn't have to vote to break the ties. - tom

[breakem]

Nambla is already pushing the limits and I don't think it has much to do with incest. Do you see these nambla types going after their own kids?

My understanding of incest is that it was there to protect the gene pool and so that the kids weren't born with all kinds of defects. I don't think that relates to adoption. I'll stand correct upon reviewing other info.

Many here are sure that incest will be made legal, but there is no logic connection in my book.

[MegaSilver]

Nambla is already pushing the limits and I don't think it has much to do with incest. Do you see these nambla types going after their own kids?

I'm not arguing that NAMBLA is an inherently perverse organization. But my point is, if something like homosexual marriage becomes legal, how much longer before we no longer view other traditionally taboo sexual behaviors as deviant? Groups like NAMBLA will not stop until pederasty is legal, and things like this only push them closer and closer toward that goal.

Many here are sure that incest will be made legal, but there is no logic connection in my book.

Well, true. I mean, for one thing, that connection assumes that our civilization can even survive long enough on its present course for that to happen.

[Coleus]

`

[theDentist]

And how often does his vote fall in conservative favor?

[oldironsides]

That is because the woman from South Africa on the Massachusetts Supreme court was put there by a Republican......

[Capt. Tom]

And how often does his vote fall in conservative favor?

Rarely.
In this state any opposition to socialism or the gay agenda is reason to stamp out what few conservatives are around.

Apparently there are 3 judges who won't go along with the program, and they will ultimately be replaced.

This isn't about law, it is about the liberal socialist gay agenda, and the end justifying the means. - Tom

[theDentist]

Then, Capt., how is it you say the Court is conservative? If anything, it's 4/7 liberal.

BTW: I lived in Mass for some 40 years, having moved here (Va) just over 1-1/2 years ago. I know what you're up against.