Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saddam's WMD Have Been Found
Insight Magazine ^ | 26 April 2004 | Kenneth R. Timmerman

Posted on 04/26/2004 7:32:46 AM PDT by Lando Lincoln

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-159 next last
To: counterpunch
This is why I think doing it right before - or even during - would be more likely, because the objective is to deprive them of any press coverage as much as possible.

I like the idea of during the convention. That will take the wind out of their sails.

61 posted on 04/26/2004 8:39:55 AM PDT by PattonReincarnated (Rebuild the Temple)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
lets hope the administration finds a way to get this out to the public.
62 posted on 04/26/2004 8:42:54 AM PDT by beebuster2000 (the only thing quagmired is the lib mind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
"...Bush needs to come out and give an address about just what has been discovered.

I suspect Bush will be doing this shortly before the Democrat Convention."

I suspect Bush will be doing this in September or October.

63 posted on 04/26/2004 8:43:23 AM PDT by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
Yet we still get the occasional goober on FR bloviating about "no evidence of WMDs." No weapons (missiles excepted) discovered yet, but no evidence? LOL
64 posted on 04/26/2004 8:43:39 AM PDT by Coop (Freedom isn't free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
bump for referral
65 posted on 04/26/2004 8:44:11 AM PDT by Khurkris (Ranger On...Rest with the Lord Ranger Tillman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale
see #48
66 posted on 04/26/2004 8:45:48 AM PDT by counterpunch (<-CLICK HERE for my CARTOONS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
Nice article. Thanks for posting it.
67 posted on 04/26/2004 8:46:39 AM PDT by syriacus (Cyberterror experts Clarke + Gorelick kept out ALL terrorists who were disguised as electrons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
If this was legit, surely it would have been out by now. My question is this, if this for real, could Bush and Co. be waiting until the "opportune moment" to bring this out? If it isn't for real, then where the h#ll are these stories coming from?
68 posted on 04/26/2004 8:49:59 AM PDT by pctech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

bump
69 posted on 04/26/2004 8:53:11 AM PDT by Eurotwit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
Bump
70 posted on 04/26/2004 8:53:12 AM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
^4L8R
71 posted on 04/26/2004 8:59:06 AM PDT by sanchmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale
I suspect Bush will be doing this in September or October.

I believe you are correct there. Let the Dems get their convention bounce and then tear 'em apart.
72 posted on 04/26/2004 9:06:24 AM PDT by BJClinton (This is how one should do a sarcasm tag: &#60;/sarcasm&#62;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a
What is telling by the silence is, our congresscritters (except for a chosen few) are no longer talking about "No WMD's found".

Now that you mention it, there has been a noticable drop off in "where are the WMD's" comments lately. Very telling indeed.

73 posted on 04/26/2004 9:13:15 AM PDT by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: LouD
Thanks for the bump.. Some definite material here for the site and/or newsletter. Want to include it in your article?
74 posted on 04/26/2004 9:16:52 AM PDT by republicandiva (giveusbackourstatelistNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Huck
That's the thing. The Bush Admin is going along with the "we had bad intel about WMD" line. They have shifted to the "democracy and UN legitimacy" rationale. Wouldnt they be out there making this case if they believed it? What gives?

From a political stand[point what gives is that the American citizen has already discounted the WMD stockpiles. Most assume, correctly I might add, that Iraq had CB weapons and the fact that they have not been found causes them angst but doesn't affect their view on the necessity to attack Iraq.

The Bush Administration will continue to look for them because they pose an immediate threat to American interests. They see no upside to discussing it on a daily basis but know they must be found to avoid CB attacks on America.

If they are found the democrats and the press are going to take a major hit in the next election, from the executive on down.

I don't care about that as much as I care about finding them and destroying them and those who have them but it would be a nice bonus.

75 posted on 04/26/2004 9:17:32 AM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott
I no longer have the link, and the named "pesticides" found, but a year ago, I had that information. The chemicals named as "pesticides" were/ are comparably fatal on direct exposure - say, within a factor of 2-5 by weight/ volume. They were in proximity to ammo dumps with WMD delivery vehicles.

Sorry: either SH was intending to use these as Chem weapons, or the Iraqis were embarking on a program to distribute pesticides by artillery shell... your choice.

I will not be surprised if I eventually discover that Syria was shipped even more dangerous agents, or if Iraqi manufacturing facilities created pesticides instead of the WMDs Saddumb was intending but he was crossed. It is also possible that there was some deterioration of the chemicals due to lack of refrigeration. Nevertheless, these stockpiles are indeed useable as chem weaponry.
76 posted on 04/26/2004 9:27:34 AM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
INTREP - read later
77 posted on 04/26/2004 9:33:17 AM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
Have you considered that we may not be announcing the finding of WMDs because we haven't found them ALL. At least some are likely to be in the hands of the "Insurgents." Not making the announcement deters the bad guys from using them against us and the Iraqi population in general. If we "find" WMDs, they can use them. Imagine what a few chemical shells into Baghdad or the Green Zone would do. Or maybe a mosque to stir things up.

78 posted on 04/26/2004 10:05:57 AM PDT by spaceman spiff (Don't anthropomorphize computers. They don't appreciate it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
So, the administration needs to be shouting this stuff from the rooftops.
79 posted on 04/26/2004 10:08:03 AM PDT by MEGoody (Kerry - isn't that a girl's name? (Conan O'Brian))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye
WMD news ping.
80 posted on 04/26/2004 10:09:08 AM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-159 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson