Skip to comments.
Rumsfeld Criticized by Influential Military Paper
Reuters ^
| 10 May 2004
| Charles Aldinger
Posted on 05/10/2004 10:55:06 AM PDT by Hal1950
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
1
posted on
05/10/2004 10:55:07 AM PDT
by
Hal1950
To: Hal1950
Wierd. I remember getting the Air Force Times when I served back in the late 60s. Is the circulation still just as wide now among military folks? Has the publication changed so much since I remember reading it?
2
posted on
05/10/2004 10:58:07 AM PDT
by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
To: Hal1950
Many U.S. newspapers have demanded Rumsfeld's resignation, including The New York Times, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Seattle Post-Intelligencer, New York Newsday, Boston Globe, Minneapolis Star Tribune and Detroit Free Press. I'm shocked...
3
posted on
05/10/2004 10:59:10 AM PDT
by
EGPWS
To: Hal1950
-"The entire affair is a failure of leadership from start to finish. From the moment they are captured, prisoners are hooded, shackled and isolated. The message to the troops: Anything goes." Somehow I missed the part where they are "shot"!
To: Hal1950
Army Times is one of four such publications owned by the Gannett Co.And that is where I quit reading. Damned leftist birdcage liner and fishwrap.
5
posted on
05/10/2004 11:00:44 AM PDT
by
upchuck
(Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm. - W. Churchill)
To: Hal1950
-"From the moment they are captured, prisoners are hooded, shackled and isolated. The message to the troops: Anything goes." So, what 'are' you supposed to do with them???
To: Hal1950
When in the heck did it become a problem to hood, shackle, and handcuff ENEMY Prisoners of War? Actually Illegal Combatants is what they are. These are dangerous people. What is wrong with these (so-called) Americans? They should not be in the service.
7
posted on
05/10/2004 11:01:14 AM PDT
by
johnb838
(Stand Up For Rummy!)
To: Hal1950
Be aware that Rummy has P*ssed off many old time Pentagon brass, by reshaping the military to be a faster/lighter/stronger military force. This is nothing more than payback for killing off wasteful and "old-thinking" weapons systems, and for the smashed toes that were stepped on in the process. Rummy is the FINEST SoD that we have ever had.
Rummy serves at the President's pleasure, and President Bush has stated that Rummy is the MAN!
LLS
8
posted on
05/10/2004 11:02:40 AM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
(We point out Kerry's record and the facts, and they just THINK it's attack politics.)
To: Hal1950
Sounds like the traitor Hackworth has some fellow jelly-spined friends inside the Army Times doing his bidding.
9
posted on
05/10/2004 11:02:57 AM PDT
by
montag813
("A nation can survive fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.")
To: EGPWS
Many U.S. newspapers have demanded Rumsfeld's resignation
Since when do newspaper "demands" count for anything? These people can't get rid of Rumsfeld for ideology so they're trying to pressure a resignation. My Gawd I hope we don't cave to this blackmail.
10
posted on
05/10/2004 11:03:58 AM PDT
by
johnb838
(Stand Up For Rummy!)
To: Hal1950
Gannet is not independent.
To: Hal1950
The Army Times is dependent on BIG MEDIA. It is no more independent than Dan Rather or Katie Couric. And it is so independent that FR cannot even post an EXCERPT of one of their articles.
To: Hal1950
Army Times is one of four such publications owned by the Gannett Co., and has a circulation of about 250,000.That'll drop off quick just like Gannett newspapers circulation around the country. They're moving faster to the left as each day passes. That's why I cancelled my delivery of a Gannett paper.
13
posted on
05/10/2004 11:06:22 AM PDT
by
b4its2late
(Always remember you're unique, just like everyone else.)
To: MineralMan
Yeah, but dont be fooled....it aint that influential! Just like any other rag, they have opinions, editorials ect.
14
posted on
05/10/2004 11:07:04 AM PDT
by
TheGunny
To: Hal1950
The Army/Navy/Air Force Times has been moving more and more left in their opinions for years. Nothing startling in this story.
To: MineralMan
NavyTimes, ArmyTimes, AirForceTimes...they're all the same. They present a far more liberal view of the military than what I've seen as the actual makeup. Occasionally they are called upon this in letters to the editor, but of course this is why they publish the more inflamatory views--they want to sell papers.
Most of the more senior active duty recognize their bias and take what is said with a grain of salt, but the junior folks are more influenced by the retoric. Times Publishing Co (Time, S.I., etc.) provides free copies of their magazines to every Navy outfit each week. In my opinion, this also influences some opinions.
Do you think they're on an indoctrination mission? Naw, couldn't be...< / sarcasm>
Comment #17 Removed by Moderator
To: Hal1950
Bush has to dance the last dance with the guy who brought him.
18
posted on
05/10/2004 11:13:18 AM PDT
by
ex-snook
(Neocon Chickenhawk for War like Liberal Cuckoo for Welfare. Both freeload.)
To: EliTkachuk
Bingo.
To: Hal1950; Cannoneer No. 4; SLB
I don't think this is appropriate from the Army Times.
20
posted on
05/10/2004 11:14:11 AM PDT
by
sauropod
("I am Locutus of Borg. Resistance is futile. You will service US.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson