Posted on 05/19/2004 2:54:18 AM PDT by Theodore R.
The late-60s Jane Fonda movie, "Barbarella" was a combined a parody of sci-fi movies with a "free love" element.
The main character, Barbarella, had a weapon called the Orgasmatron:
http://www.scifi.com/sfw/issue126/classic.html
BS. Pat Buchanan has openly declared his hatred for America -- why do you support him (assuming that you don't hate America yourself)?
Pat's love child
First, I've heard of this. Is it common knowledge among the Beltway people?
How old is this daughter of Pat now?
Get out of town! Are you for real?
Buchanan is not saying that America should not be defended. He is saying that we should not go to war to impose such defective "values" as abortion on demand on the rest of the world.
Why? Because you say so? What sort of "conservatism" is it that seeks to perpetuate evil simply because its always been with us?
Pat has it exactly right. Krauthammer, Kristol, Safire, et al, save a few, have taken on Mel Gibson with a vengence.
They have been wrong on 'culture' for years.
This is another great Buchanan article. He speaks truth to power. Pat is right about this as he is right about illegal immigration, NAFTA deals bring job loss, abortion, homosexual practices, and foreign entanglements bring war to our shores. Pat speaks for a conservative America first in defense, first in economy and first in morality.
I strongly disagree. Morality crosses cultural lines as well as national borders. There is Good and Evil and they have nothing to do with culture, customs, race, gender or anything like that. There are good and moral Muslims and immoral and bad Christians & Jews. We're in a war, not so much between cultures/countries as it is between Good and Evil, a spiritual war that starts off seeming like a secular war between competing cultures. America is fundamentally Good but needs to work hard on becoming more moral in order to win this war. This could be our longest and last war.
Could you point me to an article where Pat condemns Arab anti-semitism so we could evaluate Buchanan's acumen?
You were the one who brought up the subject. So let's discuss it.
cheesy poofs.....
Great question. Please ping me if you get an answer. I won't be holding my breath, however.
I have a problem with folks who seek to impose moral values at the point of a gun.
I don't care if they're Christian, like Buchanan, or Islamic, like the Saudis.
How 'bout a pants down spanking?
If it's Wednesday, it must be 'attack the neo-con Jews day' for Pat Buchananananan.
Where do you get the idea that Buchanan wants to force Christian morals on people at gunpoint? Don't listen to the hysterics.
You need a lesson in reading comprehension. Look at who brought up the subject. "And has Pat ever written an article condemning the anti-Semitism of the Arab world? Or was Buchanan too busy researching topics like whether diesel fumes could have really killed as many Jews as the Holocaust survivors claimed? 125 posted on 05/19/2004 9:52:18 AM EDT by 11th Earl of Mar "
The more right Buchanan is the more shrill his opponents become and berate him because they cannot refute his truth. This is another great Buchanan article. He speaks truth to power. Pat is right about this as he is right about illegal immigration, NAFTA deals bring job loss, abortion, homosexual practices, and foreign entanglements bring war to our shores. Pat speaks for a conservative America first in defense, first in economy and first in morality.
Yes, specially less choices in public facilities.
Blaming Hollywood for their behavior?
What happened to personal responsibility?
Very weak.
That the behavior exhibited by the few people who engaged in the acts we've seen portrayed ad nauseum in Abu Ghraib should be punished, and not rewarded.
That was easy Pat.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.