Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

9/11 Plot Reportedly Hatched in 1996
AP ^ | 6-18-04 | CONNIE CASS

Posted on 06/18/2004 6:38:11 PM PDT by Indy Pendance

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last
To: blam
(No contrails anywhere in the skies)

I also remember there being hardly any clouds in the sky for several days. The sky was that brilliant blue that only comes in early autumn.

61 posted on 06/18/2004 11:43:40 PM PDT by SuziQ (Bush in 2004/Because we MUST!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Mitchell
So, if the hijacking story is true, why are they not being held in the same manner as Jose Padilla?

My guess is, because they didn't hijack the plane.

They were found with shaved bodies carrying box cutters within a week of the 9/11 attacks -- that didn't get them enemy combatant status. It's not surprising that acting highly suspicious on a plane didn't get them in more trouble.

There's also the possibility that the man I spoke with jumped the gun in connecting the arrests in San Antonio with the incident at Dallas/Ft. Worth. But I'm convinced his story about the men on the plane is genuine.

62 posted on 06/18/2004 11:50:23 PM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (When he said "The Mother of All Battles", he meant it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
My guess is, because they didn't hijack the plane.

In normal circumstances, that would be the answer, of course.

But Padilla is being held even though he didn't do anything (yet), and he's apparently not being charged with a crime. It's not at all clear what the U.S. government's standards are for such arrests.

As for the four possible hijackers, if the San Antonio guys were two of them, I'm curious who the other two might have been.

63 posted on 06/18/2004 11:59:54 PM PDT by Mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Mohammed had targeted U.S. airliners before. He was indicted in the United States earlier in 1996 for plotting to bomb 12 flights over the Pacific Ocean,

Interesting that TWA Flight 800 went down in July or August of 1996. There was a cover up led by no other than Jamie Gorelick (assistant to Janet Reno) who is a member of the 9/11 Commission. Even though there were many E-Mails, letters and telephone calls to the chairman and other members, she never had to testify - in other words "mum was the word".

Is it possible the terrorists were practicing for bigger things to come?

64 posted on 06/19/2004 1:33:33 AM PDT by AnimalLover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

bttt


65 posted on 06/19/2004 1:51:07 AM PDT by lainde (Heads up...We're coming and we've got tongue blades!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: SpyGuy

Debka has an interesting article pointing out some of the factual inaccuracies in the 9-11 report and pointing out the obvious, that the report's major purpose is to blame everything on Bush.

It's really worth reading it -- it's a good analysis.


Bush and 9/11 Report: Into the Frame (Debka -- makes interesting points)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1156367/posts

The most implausible conclusion that suggests the 9/11 panel is influenced by a political agenda is its failure to find credible evidence of links between the Saddam regime and al Qaeda.

The interim conclusions reached by the 9/11 commission make sense only if it is presumed that the panel was set up to whitewash certain American and Saudi political and intelligence bodies and pin the entire blame for al Qaeda’s attacks in America on the Bush administration – incidentally dragging in the US president’s ally, the Israeli prime minister.


66 posted on 06/19/2004 1:52:03 AM PDT by FairOpinion (If you are not voting for Bush, you are voting for the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

BTTT


67 posted on 06/19/2004 4:12:39 AM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rocklobster11
Hopefully someone in Athens has read the Clancy book about the biological attack at the Olympics.

Bojinka - the plan to crash even more planes into buildings, was discovered in 1995. This and other intel was the reason there was a no fly zone over Atlanta for the Olympics in 1996. Very interestingly, they were also looking for CROP DUSTERS.

There is still an armored Ayers crop duster from the State Department's Drug War air force missing. It can be ferryed thousands of miles by using the chemical tanks for fuel.

68 posted on 06/19/2004 4:14:51 AM PDT by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: lavrenti
The Serbs lost exactly four tanks ..

..and those were probably cardboard cutouts.

69 posted on 06/19/2004 4:49:37 AM PDT by evad (What's BAD for democRATs is GOOD for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

Comment #70 Removed by Moderator

To: MJY1288


71 posted on 06/19/2004 5:19:38 AM PDT by Two Thirds Vote Aye (al-Qaeda and the democrat party are DESPERATE to get Kerry elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #72 Removed by Moderator

To: Indy Pendance

.


Remember the Lost and Suffering on September 11, 2001

http://www.TheAlamoFILM.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=33


.


73 posted on 06/19/2004 6:09:17 AM PDT by ALOHA RONNIE (Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.LZXRAY.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Battle Axe

Yes. An ARMORED crop duster.

Disappeared October 1, 2001. Tail number N3090M.

These are used by the State Department to eradicate drug - e.g. coca - crops in foreign countries. The cockpits are armored to reduce the chance they can be shot down.

The chemical tanks are also modified so they can be used to carry extra fuel. Except for the inadvisability of doing this in a single-engine plane, it is entirely possible to fly this kind of plane across the Atlantic. I don't think terrorists will be fretting over the single-engine thing.

At treetop height, it could fly past any but the most vigilant air defense.

Even better, the particular plane in this case also has a smoke dispenser. That's probably good enough to beat an IR-seeking missile.

But, hey, it's been a few years. Nobody takes that long to plan a mass-casualty attack, right?


74 posted on 06/19/2004 7:28:26 AM PDT by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: eno_

Did the crop duster go missing from the US or a foreign country?


75 posted on 06/19/2004 7:30:34 AM PDT by prairiebreeze (Proud in my refusal to purchase a copy of "My Lie".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

Comment #76 Removed by Moderator

To: Battle Axe; prairiebreeze

This crop duster thing is just one of the wonderful side-benefits of the Drug War.

The plane was owned by the State Department.

Ayers makes a specific model for crop eradication. Turbo engine, armor, and all the other goodies.


77 posted on 06/19/2004 7:53:49 AM PDT by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

It went missing somewhere between Columbia and Florida.


78 posted on 06/19/2004 7:54:39 AM PDT by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Battle Axe

Yes, it isn't trivial to deliver anthrax, even "weaponized" anthrax, and make it effective against a large number of people.

You need the right kind of equipment on a crop duster for dispersing a powder. You might have to tune it for the anthrax spores and how they are "milled."

Funny how you never hear anymore about all the irradiation gear the Post Office supposedly has.


79 posted on 06/19/2004 7:58:41 AM PDT by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

Comment #80 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson