Posted on 07/21/2004 10:58:33 AM PDT by jmstein7
That's the only 'your welcome' one I made yet, LOL.
Has someone complained to you about posting one?? Too flashy after all the huge graphics that are posted???
LOL, that sounds like my husband!!
I like 'calm' days SmartA. You sound a little 'down' tonight?
Bumping for more research tomorrow if I have time.
It's nice to be able to 'sleep in', I do it every day, LOL! I'm a nightowl by nature.
That's great to be able to work out of your home. Glad you have a break for awhile!
This thread ties in the linkage between the stolen documents and the speech given by Kerry which was removed from his web site.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1175961/posts
Senators link Kerry to Berger scandal
WorldNetDaily ^ | 7/21/04 | WorldNetDaily
Posted on 07/21/2004 6:25:00 PM PDT by wagglebee
WASHINGTON – Two Republican senators yesterday demanded presidential candidate John Kerry explain the role of Sandy Berger in his campaign, following revelations the Justice Department is investigating the former national security adviser for taking highly classified documents related to the Sept. 11 terrorism investigation out of the National Archives.
Sen. Gordon Smith, R-Ore., accused Berger of "taking highly classified documents, stuffing them in his trousers, using them for the Kerry campaign, and then admitting to destroying those documents."
"He says it was sloppy," said Smith. "I will admit to you, when you stuff classified legal documents in your briefs, it looks sloppy. But it may be worse than that. And in fairness to the president of the United States, it's important that this be followed and pursued so that the American people can know that the predicate of many of the charges made against George W. Bush are based upon lies and deception. And the American people need the truth on these matters."
Sen. Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., said he found it coincidental that the missing documents had to do with security at airports and seaports – areas in which Kerry has been critical of Homeland Security policies.
"Now, I would hope that, number one, the Kerry administration would immediately disavow any connection with Sandy Berger, that they would come forward with any documents, whether legal or illegal documents, that have been presented to them by Sandy Berger, and that we can bring this matter to a close very quickly," Chambliss said. "No accusations are being made about how they used or if they used these documents, but this is extremely sensitive, folks, and this involves a significant breach in our intelligence community, and the Kerry campaign needs to come forward with the answers to this."
Chambliss went on to point out that after the documents were taken, "John Kerry held a photo-op and attacked the president on port security. The documents that were taken may have been utilized for that press conference. They were then destroyed, according to Mr. Berger."
"In any event, it is now obvious to me that top secret information was illegally taken, and provided to at least John Kerry, John Edwards and Hillary Clinton."
What is the likelihood of a criminal investigation that implicates three sitting US Senators, of which one is the challenging Presidential candidate, another the challenging Vice Presidential candidate and the third the former First Lady and the alleged power behind the throne in their party? Incredible.
The Google trap/hold on Kerry's speech is now gone from Google.
This is what we now get on the Google search:
Tip: Try removing quotes from your search to get more results.
Your search - cache:-D_V0TfzaH0J:www.johnkerry.com/pressroom/releases/pr_2004_0227a.html "UCLA International Institute" site:johnkerry.com - did not match any documents.
Suggestions:
- Make sure all words are spelled correctly.
- Try different keywords.
- Try more general keywords.
- Try fewer keywords.
Also, you can try Google Answers for expert help with your search.
this thread is being linked to from National Review Online/The Kerryspot .
I guess so.
It is nice to know that we have about 24 hours to snare the data on Google before it disappears after a site removes something.
"Is that normal to have something disappear that fast from Google?"
No, it's NoT, in my experience, anyway. I've used the cache system for years.
Another place to look is: archive.org
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.