Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LOGO INFRINGERS(Starwood Hotels Suing Bush campaign over 'W' logo)
NY Post ^ | 8/2/03

Posted on 08/02/2004 5:59:45 PM PDT by finnman69

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 last
To: Gorzaloon; lady lawyer
There's no way this will succeed.

I agree. For Starwood Hotels to have an argument the symbols would have to be similar and pertain to the same broad class of product. The closer the symbols in appearance, the broader the classification of product considered, and vice versa. Furthermore, the whole of the symbol would be considered rather than its component parts (as Gorzaloon said, the font style matters, not just the use of the letter W). "W" in and of itself is not distinctive enough to be a trademark.
101 posted on 08/02/2004 8:04:22 PM PDT by calenel (Peace Through Strength, and when necessary, Peace Through Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: mhking

LOL, what can I say... Go W go!


102 posted on 08/02/2004 8:09:11 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul (The beauty of flip-flopping consists entirely in saying one thing and doing something else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Gorzaloon
I believe you are absolutely right. One is a sans-serif typeface. Further, they are used in different products and markets,
so no brand confusion can result.
.....

They need to get slapped for abuse of process and vexatious litigation.

Exactly right on both points

103 posted on 08/02/2004 8:20:50 PM PDT by Diddley (Hey Rip Van Kerry. Where’ve you been for the last 30 years?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

Both designs are craptacular, but at least the Hotel logo was original.


104 posted on 08/02/2004 8:45:43 PM PDT by anonymous_user (<a href="http://www.michaelmoorehatesamerica.com" target="_blank">Michael Moore</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

If integrity matters, there is a heck of a lot more of it in the W in Texas than the W in New York. I bought one of those pricey Starwood Resort cards and none of their properties would honor it - and yes, it was the real deal. Bought from a friend that manages a Starwood property.


105 posted on 08/02/2004 8:54:17 PM PDT by BJungNan (Stop Spam - Do NOT buy from junk email.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BushCheney4America

bttt


106 posted on 08/03/2004 5:49:37 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55 (http://www.osurepublicans.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: finnman69; All
This reminded me of Despair suing millions for trademark infringement for the use of :-(

DESPAIR, INC. SECURES OFFICIAL TRADEMARK
REGISTRATION FOR ":-(", ANNOUNCES PLANS TO SUE
MILLIONS FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Media Relations
Email: media@despair.com
Web: www.despair.com
Fax: 214.826.1952

DALLAS, TX - January 2nd, 2001 - In a move that has millions across the Internet community frowning, Despair, Inc. today announced that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) had awarded them a registered trademark for the 'frowny' emoticon which serves as their logo.

At a press conference, Despair's COO, Dr. E.L. Kersten, announced his intentions to sue "anyone and everyone who uses the so-called 'frowny' emoticon, or our trademarked logo, in their written email correspondence. Ever."

full article begins here:
http://www.despair.com/frownonthis.html

107 posted on 08/03/2004 5:57:36 AM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
Besides, they should beware of alienating all the Dubya supporters.

I've never heard of them, but I'll sleep on the sidewalk before I ever patronize them.

108 posted on 08/03/2004 6:05:38 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty

bump


109 posted on 08/03/2004 6:40:25 AM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: wimpycat

S= Westin Hotel


110 posted on 08/03/2004 6:42:13 AM PDT by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah

or single common words or common phrases.


111 posted on 08/03/2004 6:58:29 AM PDT by Critter (...an online gathering place for sissy boy, girlie men, nanny staters, and jackboot lovers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Critter

Depends on how common the phrase is. "Fair and balanced" was worthy of protection. Franken should have been slammed, IMO.

These libs trying to undermine the President and copyright the "W" need to be tossed out of court though.


112 posted on 08/03/2004 2:56:39 PM PDT by jojodamofo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: anonymous_user

113 posted on 08/03/2004 3:09:53 PM PDT by So Cal Rocket (Fabrizio Quattrocchi: "Adesso vi faccio vedere come muore un italiano")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
If similarity of trademark is the issue then it looks to me like they should be going after W Network's W:

vs.

114 posted on 08/04/2004 4:38:24 PM PDT by RansomOttawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson