Skip to comments.
They Said It! (James Carville and Paul Begala)
Republican National Committee ^
| September 7, 2004
Posted on 09/07/2004 11:29:25 AM PDT by RWR8189
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 last
To: Only1choice____Freedom
How can CNN allow these two clowns to continue co-hosting Crossfire? Sure, it's an opinion show, but you don't see them hiring two Bush consultants to go up against them.
To: NewLand
Yeah, maybe by 1996 he just ran for the hell of it. No Bushes at stake then. I read just recently about his endorsing W in 2000. It surprised me too when I read it.
To: RWR8189
Where James gets his best ideas...
43
posted on
09/07/2004 2:10:21 PM PDT
by
conservonator
(Blank by popular demand)
To: ken5050
"Has CNN addressed the question of any semblance of objectivity?" Sorry, but this is an oxymoron!
44
posted on
09/07/2004 3:21:03 PM PDT
by
Prost1
(Why isn't Berger in jail?)
To: Prost1
I deserved that!.. I had it coming....(G)
45
posted on
09/07/2004 3:21:58 PM PDT
by
ken5050
(Bill Clinton has just signed to be the national spokesman for Hummer..)
To: Only1choice____Freedom
"Carville = Gollum" That is cruel to Gollum.
46
posted on
09/07/2004 3:23:18 PM PDT
by
Prost1
(Why isn't Berger in jail?)
To: RWR8189
Hillary wanted James and Paul to get some practice before her 2008 run. Kerry's a goner and everybody in the Democratic leadership structure knows it.
47
posted on
09/07/2004 3:28:50 PM PDT
by
midftfan
To: midftfan
Tweedledumb and Tweedledumber.
48
posted on
09/07/2004 3:31:25 PM PDT
by
WestVirginiaRebel
(Democrats and Liberals suffer from MSD-Massive Spending Disorder)
To: ken5050
Are thesew two still going to appear on Crossfire?..
Yes, and O'Reilly is livid -- says he's going to make a huge issue out of this on his show tonight. Even Ellis said this was wrong (on his afternoon show)
Has CNN addressed the question of any semblance of objectivity?
Evidentally they have no problem with it -- shouldn't the FCC have a problem, though?
To: RWR8189
50
posted on
09/07/2004 3:36:22 PM PDT
by
petercooper
(Kerry passes up terror briefing: "They have offered to brief me. I just haven't had time.")
To: kellynla
The various states have dead lines when a candidates name must be on the ballot.
Pres, Bush barely made it in Illinois.
51
posted on
09/07/2004 3:41:08 PM PDT
by
Graybeard58
(Graybeard - Illinois resident - Keyes voter)
To: Graybeard58
The various states have dead lines when a candidates name must be on the ballot. Pres, Bush barely made it in Illinois.
I have no clue what question you're answering? LOL
52
posted on
09/07/2004 4:08:18 PM PDT
by
kellynla
(U.S.M.C. 1/5 1st Mar Div. Nam 69&70 Semper Fi http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnkerry.com)
To: kellynla
See under post #51 where it says "To 32"? He was replying to your post #32. Hit the "To 32" and it will take you there.
Your question was:
The only question I have is whether the 'Rats can replace him with Klintoon any time before the election???
53
posted on
09/07/2004 4:14:30 PM PDT
by
RobFromGa
(A desperate man is a dangerous man, and Kerry is getting desperate.)
To: RobFromGa
Oh okay.... now I comprendo! LOL
so do you think that the 'Rats will drop the Traitor and insert the W I D E L O A D ???
54
posted on
09/07/2004 4:25:51 PM PDT
by
kellynla
(U.S.M.C. 1/5 1st Mar Div. Nam 69&70 Semper Fi http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnkerry.com)
To: kellynla
I have no clue what question you're answering? This One:
The only question I have is whether the 'Rats can replace him with Klintoon any time before the election???
55
posted on
09/07/2004 4:29:00 PM PDT
by
Graybeard58
(Graybeard - Illinois resident - Keyes voter)
To: kellynla
so do you think that the 'Rats will drop the Traitor and insert the W I D E L O A D ??? I don't know about the other states but I believe the dead line to get on the ballot has passed in Illinois.
56
posted on
09/07/2004 4:32:24 PM PDT
by
Graybeard58
(Graybeard - Illinois resident - Keyes voter)
To: kellynla
I actually put up a thread to explore this topic over a month ago to discuss the legality of this.
The consensus was that it couldn't be done legally if Kerry were alive, but if he passed away then there could be a substitute candidate put forward.
Another consensus was that laws don't mean anything to Democrats and that the courts would make sure there was a Democrat on the ballot if Kerry decided for whatever reason that he couldn't take it any more.
I don't think PIAPS will run this year, she has no chance. But one never knows what lurks in the FBI files.
57
posted on
09/07/2004 4:34:29 PM PDT
by
RobFromGa
(A desperate man is a dangerous man, and Kerry is getting desperate.)
To: RobFromGa
So from what you guys could tell, there is nothing illegal if Kerry were to drop out this week and Klintoon would step in...(I mean a whole month has gone by and the Traitor has yet to have a press conference to answer the allegations of the Swiftees)
58
posted on
09/07/2004 4:42:36 PM PDT
by
kellynla
(U.S.M.C. 1/5 1st Mar Div. Nam 69&70 Semper Fi http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnkerry.com)
To: kellynla
No it is illegal but laws don't apply to Democrats.
59
posted on
09/07/2004 4:57:20 PM PDT
by
RobFromGa
(A desperate man is a dangerous man, and Kerry is getting desperate.)
To: RobFromGa
Oh, okay, so legally the 'Rats have to keep the Traitor...no New Jersey surprises...LOL
60
posted on
09/07/2004 5:14:05 PM PDT
by
kellynla
(U.S.M.C. 1/5 1st Mar Div. Nam 69&70 Semper Fi http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnkerry.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
