Posted on 11/24/2004 8:35:26 AM PST by Maria S
This paper probably runs a DAILY Molly Ivins!!
What's wrong with being anti-liberal? That's like saying it is wrong to be pro-American.
Incredible.
Wait...Malkin is ASIAN!!! I had no idea! good thing this article pointed this out to me.
Liberal Media Bias rears its ugly head again!
I bet they would have no problem with an anti-conservative writer.
Does the rainbow coalition know about this? Is Whoopi Goldberg concerned about free speech? Does the Pope crap in the woods?
A lot of people read her articles but don't know who she is.
I'm sure it's not a big deal to Malkin as she is a great writer and will be just fine without this piece of drek publishing her stuff.
ahem..pictures?
there IS a malkin rule in effect.
If only these papers had the same attitude toward writers who were "too anti-conservative."
Passing on the arguments about liberal/anti-liberal and whatever, one must point out that her book which attempts to justify the imprisonment of Japanese-Americans during WWII goes too far. It's also factually BS, and I know, since my new PhD (YES! YES! IT'S OVER!) was born out six years of hard research into the U.S. domestic policies during WWII.
"This paper probably runs a DAILY Molly Ivins!!"
Let's complain about the liberal columnists being too anti-Conservative and see if they get dropped, too.
Oh, wait, I forgot - Free Speech is for liberals, only.
>She adds norhting to genuine political discourse<
Except the other side of liberalism. IOW fairness and balance.
Not a good enough search then.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1286736/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.