Skip to comments.
Intel Acquires Chip Designers From HP
The Associated Press ^
| Dec 15, 2004
| Matthew Fordahl
Posted on 12/15/2004 6:44:58 PM PST by BenLurkin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
1
posted on
12/15/2004 6:44:58 PM PST
by
BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
Nice chip, shame they couldn't commit to it.
2
posted on
12/15/2004 6:48:30 PM PST
by
general_re
("What's plausible to you is unimportant." - D'man)
To: BenLurkin
Blah. The "Itanic". AMD kicks their butts. And when my chip gets out, watch out world!
-Yossarian (chip designer)
3
posted on
12/15/2004 6:51:58 PM PST
by
Yossarian
(Remember: NOT ALL HEART ATTACKS HAVE TRADITIONAL SYMPTOMS)
To: general_re
Did they say how many employees are going on the street?
4
posted on
12/15/2004 6:57:26 PM PST
by
Nachoman
To: Yossarian
Of course, I have to hand it to Intel for keeping a team together. Having a good working chip team, then having it be ripped apart and finding yourself needing to start the team from scratch, sucks.
But then again, you'd have to be working for Intel, one of the least-liked companies in the Silicon Valley - very compartmentalized, very secretive, and very stifling for good designers.
5
posted on
12/15/2004 7:03:33 PM PST
by
Yossarian
(Remember: NOT ALL HEART ATTACKS HAVE TRADITIONAL SYMPTOMS)
To: Nachoman
Dunno. Guess it depends on how many HP'ers they decide not to hire. Sounds like those that want to work for Intel will probably get the chance. Good for them - better Intel than sitting around and waiting for Carly to axe them ;)
6
posted on
12/15/2004 7:06:29 PM PST
by
general_re
("What's plausible to you is unimportant." - D'man)
To: Yossarian
But then again, you'd have to be working for Intel, one of the least-liked companies in the Silicon Valley - very compartmentalized, very secretive, and very stifling for good designers. That must be why all those Alpha guys jumped to Intel last year - because it sucks so much to work there. Or is it because they're not good designers? ;)
7
posted on
12/15/2004 7:14:03 PM PST
by
general_re
("What's plausible to you is unimportant." - D'man)
To: general_re
The Alpha wasn't a good design?
8
posted on
12/15/2004 7:23:09 PM PST
by
Abcdefg
To: general_re
I'd have to guess that they gave the Alpha guys good incentive (read $) to go over as a whole team. That, and once you are in a good team, you know what others are good at AND YOU KNOW YOUR TOOLS & TECH WELL, you don't feel like leaving it.
I just see people very happy to leave Intel. Of course, I've seen people eager to leave NVidia as well (it's a notorious meat-grinder), but at least they say they respect their management, even as they are working them to death....
9
posted on
12/15/2004 7:24:10 PM PST
by
Yossarian
(Remember: NOT ALL HEART ATTACKS HAVE TRADITIONAL SYMPTOMS)
To: Abcdefg
The Alpha ROCKED! Too bad that they were doing it for DEC....
Alpha and StrongARM are my two favorite chips, from a designer's perspective.
10
posted on
12/15/2004 7:26:47 PM PST
by
Yossarian
(Remember: NOT ALL HEART ATTACKS HAVE TRADITIONAL SYMPTOMS)
To: BenLurkin
Itanium - the solution in search of a problem. I'm still waiting for those 64 bit apps. Notepad-64 gets a bit old after awhile.
11
posted on
12/15/2004 7:26:55 PM PST
by
Doohickey
("This is a hard and dirty war, but when it's over, nothing will ever be too difficult again.”)
To: Abcdefg
A little bit of sarcasm, my friend ;)
12
posted on
12/15/2004 7:27:44 PM PST
by
general_re
("What's plausible to you is unimportant." - D'man)
To: Yossarian
What's wrong with the 6502?
13
posted on
12/15/2004 7:29:33 PM PST
by
Nick Danger
(Want some wood?)
To: Yossarian
I've done a lot of contract work at a lot of places - every place I've ever been, there was someone there who was happy to leave. Sometimes the place really did suck, and sometimes it was the people leaving who sucked - you just never really know 'til you're on the inside ;)
14
posted on
12/15/2004 7:29:51 PM PST
by
general_re
("What's plausible to you is unimportant." - D'man)
To: Doohickey
If you don't need 64-bit addressing (i.e. if you don't need to access more than, say, 2 GB of RAM at any given time), I'd stay away from a 64 bit chip.
Why? Because all those 64-bit pathways make the chip bigger, and bigger chips are slower chips.
Of course, some media instructions are good to have as wide as reasonable, and operating systems will use more and more RAM as disk caches. But in general, it's like renting a limo when a Ferrari would do.
15
posted on
12/15/2004 7:32:30 PM PST
by
Yossarian
(Remember: NOT ALL HEART ATTACKS HAVE TRADITIONAL SYMPTOMS)
To: Yossarian
16
posted on
12/15/2004 7:33:10 PM PST
by
krb
(TANSTAAFB)
To: krb
Can't say yet :-) But when it comes out, it will make waves, that's for sure!
17
posted on
12/15/2004 7:36:34 PM PST
by
Yossarian
(Remember: NOT ALL HEART ATTACKS HAVE TRADITIONAL SYMPTOMS)
To: Yossarian
Okay, who do you work for? ;)
18
posted on
12/15/2004 7:37:51 PM PST
by
general_re
("What's plausible to you is unimportant." - D'man)
To: Yossarian
If you don't need 64-bit addressing (i.e. if you don't need to access more than, say, 2 GB of RAM at any given time), I'd stay away from a 64 bit chip.It's not the address space that interests me, it's the 64-bit registers I would like to be able to use.
19
posted on
12/15/2004 7:40:58 PM PST
by
krb
(TANSTAAFB)
To: general_re
I shouldn't really say. Let's just say it'sa big monster of a company.
20
posted on
12/15/2004 7:41:35 PM PST
by
Yossarian
(Remember: NOT ALL HEART ATTACKS HAVE TRADITIONAL SYMPTOMS)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson