Skip to comments.
Full CBS Report on "RatherGate" (Long)
CBS News ^
| 1-10-2005
| CBS
Posted on 01/10/2005 7:32:00 AM PST by Thanatos
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
1
posted on
01/10/2005 7:32:00 AM PST
by
Thanatos
To: Thanatos
BTTT
don't cha think posting just a link would have been better? LOL
so what's the bottom line?
are they holding to the Blather line that "they were misled but the story is legit?" LOL
2
posted on
01/10/2005 7:35:12 AM PST
by
kellynla
(U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
To: Thanatos
Can't conclude political bias was involved? What a white wash.
3
posted on
01/10/2005 7:35:48 AM PST
by
peyton randolph
(CAIR supports TROP terrorists)
To: Thanatos
The attacks on the September 8 Segment began virtually immediately. One of the first came on freerepublic.com, a website:
4
posted on
01/10/2005 7:37:15 AM PST
by
OXENinFLA
To: Thanatos
Thanks for the post. Bookmarking for later reading. I wonder if there's a pdf link to this somewhere?
5
posted on
01/10/2005 7:38:59 AM PST
by
Colonel_Flagg
("I speak Spanish to God, French to women, English to men, and Japanese to my horse."-Buckaroo Banzai)
To: Thanatos
The Panel has not been able to conclude with absolute certainty whether the Killian documents are authentic or forgeries. Yeah, and we can't say with absolute certainty that 2+2=4.....
To: Thanatos
The Panel has not been able to conclude with absolute certainty whether the Killian documents are authentic or forgeries. This sentence says it all. CYA.
7
posted on
01/10/2005 7:40:03 AM PST
by
LoneGOPinCT
(UConn Hoops. Patriots. Red Sox. Bush. Motor City Bowl Champs ;^) Anyone need me to root for a team?)
To: Thanatos
CBS News should establish a protocol for stories that require authentication of any materials, including documents, videotapes, recordings, and photographs. Such a protocol could identify experts, vetted in advance, who might be called on to assist with authentication. Removed from original report:
"If initial authentication proves said materials are shoddily produced and couldn't stand up to Internet bloggers and those damn "Freepers," said materials should be forged improved upon until they can pass the smell test."
8
posted on
01/10/2005 7:40:47 AM PST
by
Lou L
To: Colonel_Flagg
9
posted on
01/10/2005 7:43:03 AM PST
by
TomGuy
(America: Best friend or worst enemy. Choose wisely.)
To: Thanatos
Wonder what this load of whitewash cost seeBS? How much did the republican judge earn?
To: Thanatos
I'll read it, I promise, but can someone bottom line this for me?
11
posted on
01/10/2005 7:44:26 AM PST
by
Jenya
(I'm a newbie here, but not to life. Don't even think of imposing your seniority on me.)
To: OXENinFLA
The attacks on the September 8 Segment began virtually immediately. One of the first came on freerepublic.com, a website: Cool, although I am certain it was the first that pointed out with absolute certainty the documents were obviously fake, something this report still can't admit despite there being enough evidence that would convince the OJ jury.
To: kellynla
>>don't cha think posting just a link would have been better?
No. Links go away. FreeRepublic will, hopefully, be here for a long time.
To: Thanatos
I thought this was supposed to be an investigation of Rather, not Bush.
LOL, this is some pretty amazing 'STUFF'.
Were Rather's sources bonified? Where their documents real? Did Rather exercise due dilligence?
The answers to these questions DO NOT require the Bush record to be investigated, or aired.
If every accusation regarding Bush by Rather's story were true, it still would be unsupportable if the documents didn't validate that. Therefore the documents and sources should be the fucus here, not the Bush record.
14
posted on
01/10/2005 7:45:21 AM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservat)
To: LoneGOPinCT
So this panel was just "investigating" WHO SHOULD BE FIRED??
I thought they were investigating WHO FAKED THE DOCUMENT?
CBS needed a panel to decide who to fire? Wasn't that obvious in the first week?
How very typical of elites, they are willing to destroy lives, reputations and livelihood's of everyone but their own.
To: Thanatos
Someone needs to post that cool SeeBS animated *.gif to this thread.
To: TomGuy
17
posted on
01/10/2005 7:47:50 AM PST
by
Colonel_Flagg
("I speak Spanish to God, French to women, English to men, and Japanese to my horse."-Buckaroo Banzai)
To: kellynla
Poor Dan... he was overworked... hurricane, etc.... wasn't giving it enough attention...
(violins in background)...
You get the idea?
To: Thanatos
>I>The Panel has not been able to conclude with absolute certainty whether the Killian documents are authentic or not
Well folks ... how about starting with the PO Box on the memo header ... P.O. Box 23456? Get a clue ...
19
posted on
01/10/2005 7:51:52 AM PST
by
BluH2o
To: peyton randolph
The Panel was not able to reach a definitive conclusion as to the authenticity of the Killian documents
what a bunch of "un-flushables! ...
20
posted on
01/10/2005 7:52:48 AM PST
by
Zacs Mom
(Proud wife of a Marine!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson