Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/10/2005 2:47:28 PM PST by Mr. Silverback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: Mr. Silverback

Well, good for him. But I believe he will still have to answer for all the people he purposefully directed towards atheism.


148 posted on 01/11/2005 11:21:36 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (God is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Silverback

It says somewhere in the Bible that God will reveal himself more and more as time goes by...with the discovery of DNA and Intelligent Design...the information has always been there, but we are just at the tip of the iceberg in discovering it.

Blessed are those that have not seen and still believe...I keep thinking that in our technology age, our faith (or lack of it) requires us to have so many physical evidences of God's existance.


170 posted on 01/11/2005 2:08:13 PM PST by sonserae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Silverback

For later reading


196 posted on 01/11/2005 8:36:26 PM PST by Marie Antoinette (The same thing we do every day, Pinky. We're going to TAKE OVER THE WORLD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Silverback

"First, he recognized that evolutionary theory has no reasonable explanation for “the first emergence of living from non-living matter”—that is, the origin of life. Second, even if a living cell or primitive animal had somehow assembled itself from non-living chemicals, he reasoned it would have no ability to reproduce."

On the issue of how life first sprung from non-life, the author's lack of imagination leads him into believing that this serves as evidence for intelligent design. For example, clay is an interesting substance. After having it's shape modified, it reforms to it's original shape. There are analogies to this on the macro-molecular scale.

On the second point, his argument smacks of reductionism. Let us stipulate that non-living chemicals cannot reproduce. Even so, how does this mean that cells can not reproduce, simply because it's constituent parts cannot?


198 posted on 01/11/2005 9:11:58 PM PST by sigarms
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Silverback
Sorry to disappoint, but he's still an atheist

Which means all of the witty observations (like "old atheists get religion chuckle chuckle") are crap.

201 posted on 01/11/2005 9:21:42 PM PST by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Silverback

Regarding G-d, there is no evidence, only faith and conjecture. On this earth, that is all anyone has regarding the question of G-d.


219 posted on 01/12/2005 2:46:46 AM PST by muir_redwoods
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Silverback
Wow.

C.S. Lewis was without a doubt the most influential Christian thinker and apologist of the 20th Century.

229 posted on 01/12/2005 5:38:21 AM PST by Tennessean4Bush (An optimist believes we live in the best of all possible worlds, a pessimist fears this is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Silverback; Dr. Eckleburg
he acknowledges God as creator but not as a personal deity. In his opinion, “There is no room either for any supernatural revelation of that God or any transactions between that God and individual human beings.”

LOL. Which is no acknowledgement at all. His god has short little arms

260 posted on 01/12/2005 11:26:08 AM PST by D Edmund Joaquin (Secret Agent Man (Step away,Ma'am, I've been labeled " a danger"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Silverback; Squantos; Travis McGee

Why are old people always reading the Bible?

Cramming for finals.


275 posted on 01/12/2005 1:05:07 PM PST by TEXASPROUD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Silverback
One thing is true....
The Third human born had to come from the first and second..
A chicken or egg thingy.. where did the first two come from..
WHAT A CONCEPT....
Drives democrats nutz.. and most RINOS..
I'm not as smart as them folks.. it seems obvious to me..
276 posted on 01/12/2005 1:11:04 PM PST by hosepipe (This propaganda has been ok'ed me to included some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Silverback
In fact, he told a group last May that he considers both the Christian God and the Islamic God to be “omnipotent Oriental despots—cosmic Saddam Husseins.”

It is remarkable, the similarity of this expression, to C.S. Lewis' repeated reference to God as the 'Cosmic Sadist', in his A Grief Observed, for profoundly sad reasons my favorite Lewis book.

300 posted on 02/01/2005 6:08:20 AM PST by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are hydrogen, ignorance and stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Silverback

"Flew has, thus, become a Deist—that is, he acknowledges God as creator but not as a personal deity."

But belief in Him is still refused?

How strange.


316 posted on 02/01/2005 8:26:40 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson