Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GEFFEN UNLOADS ON HILLARY: 'SHE CAN'T WIN'
Drudge ^ | 2-17-05

Posted on 02/17/2005 8:55:42 PM PST by hope

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-168 next last
To: dirtboy

Women of all ideological stripes deeply dislike the woman.

I've heard a lot of voiced fear that women will turn out in droves to have a woman President. I'm not convinced. I know my sex. Yes, for some a woman President would be a draw. For that woman to be Hillary...

I wouldn't count on that "sister" loyalty being a lock.

The guy is right about her. A Dem candidate has yet to crack the 50% mark since Carter's first election. Hillary is polarizing. You can state Bush was polarizing, but Republicans have cracked 50% with 43, 41, Reagan and Nixon. Last time Dems cracked 50% was Carter's one term. We can afford to have a polarizing figure so long as everyone turns out. Dems turn out their base they have 48%-49% max. The only way Hill wins is by splitting the Republican base in two. I'm sure that is her intention but it's chancy. Dems would have a better chance taking a figure people don't dislike from the start to run.


41 posted on 02/17/2005 9:39:34 PM PST by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: hope

She is moving to the right, though....


42 posted on 02/17/2005 9:42:31 PM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hope

Meow!


43 posted on 02/17/2005 9:42:36 PM PST by mercy (20 years a Gates sucker was enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hope
she is very cunning.

Truer that most Freepers realize. Everyone thought Clinton didn't have a chance. What people don't understand the MSM will be 20000000x more excited for her than Kerry. They will try to convince everyone that the Republic will die unless she is elected. And, the biggest factor will be that the MSM will convince the gullible electorate that this will be the 3rd term of Clinton. B.Clinton will roll out the charm and be the one "essentially" running for her. If anyone thinks she has NO chance, then you don't know how single minded she is about becoming President. She would sell her soul to the Devil to get the chance. At this point, I can't see anyone on the Rep side to beat her. Make no mistake she will be formidable -- if only because of the propaganda the MSM will put forth. IT will make Goebbels look like an amateur.

44 posted on 02/17/2005 9:43:06 PM PST by liberty2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: hope

How many men are going to vote for a sixty-something, tired and used-looking old hag to be president of the United States. Add to that the women in this country who find her repulsive personally and her ridiculous marriage a joke. I don't think she is the shoe-in everyone thinks she is.


45 posted on 02/17/2005 9:44:24 PM PST by hardworking (-O-U)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wil H; Mia T
Geffen is just running interference.

I am never prone to agreeing with these kind of conjectures, but in this case I wouldn't be surprised.

Don't drop your guard.....

If the G.O.P. runs a moderate, get used to saying President Hillary.
Anyone that dismisses her is a fool.

46 posted on 02/17/2005 9:50:08 PM PST by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

ROFLOL!


47 posted on 02/17/2005 9:54:01 PM PST by Humidston (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1282122/posts - Blood on the Potomac!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Squantos

Just south of her hips is another 80lbs


48 posted on 02/17/2005 9:57:49 PM PST by GeronL (The Old Media is at war with the New Media...... We are all Matt Drudges now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: hope
Geffen is a liberal - and liberals are almost always WRONG!

Watch out for the evil one. If she wins the nonexistent Social Security lock box will be replaced with her Swiss bank account.
49 posted on 02/17/2005 9:59:03 PM PST by still_learning (Don't you all miss Teresa Heinz Kerry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
Add Geffen to Harold Ickes also saying she can't win. She IS a polarizing figure, in fact they don't come from anywhere more polarizing than the Beast.

To add to that, all the baggage she has, and I just don;t think she can win a national election.

A lot of people, FReeepers included, think she can win, but I just don;t think it's possible.

Maybe it would have been possible for her to win back in the 90's, but not today. At least not since Algore invented the internet. /sarcasm

50 posted on 02/17/2005 9:59:05 PM PST by libs_kma (USA: The land of the Free....Because of the Brave!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: digger48
Kerry got away with it

And he came damn close to winning, even running on no substance and 4 months of Vietnam service 35 years ago.

Those who keep saying Hillary can't win need to look at how close Kerry came---considering his lack of substance, against a sitting war-time President. He damn near won. Had the OBL tape not shown up the weekend before the election--and reminded many that terrorism was still a real threat--John Kerry would be President.

Right now, based on name value, Hillary Clinton is the only name of National recognition. Treat her as a light-weight threat and Pubbies will be the ones seeking solace and counseling as she is sworn in in January '09.

There is not one GOP name in circulation that can compete with Hillary Clinton for '08. (If there were, one would be challenging her for '06, yet none, so far, have voiced interest. Why not?)
51 posted on 02/17/2005 10:00:50 PM PST by TomGuy (America: Best friend or worst enemy. Choose wisely.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

BTW KarlInOhio, love the tagline. Ken Blackwell will have my vote for Governor in 2006 also.


52 posted on 02/17/2005 10:01:17 PM PST by libs_kma (USA: The land of the Free....Because of the Brave!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: digger48
Kerry got away with it

Ahhh. He lost

53 posted on 02/17/2005 10:06:16 PM PST by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

Yay Arkancide!!


54 posted on 02/17/2005 10:10:14 PM PST by NationSoConceived ("Truth bestows no pardon upon error, but wipes it out in the most effectual manner." - M.B.E.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: paul51

< No, let her run. The guy is right. Remember how she dodged the press and any serious questions when she was running for the senate in NY? She could never prevail with those tactics in a national election and she sure couldn't weather the scrutiny. >

I agree. A Dim winning in NY is no test. What plays in NY does not play across the country. She has none of Bill's charisma. She can try the middle all she wants, but it won't work for her. But I say, "Go ahead. Make our day"!


55 posted on 02/17/2005 10:20:07 PM PST by GOP_Proud (Those who proclaim tolerance have the least for my views.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
"Those who keep saying Hillary can't win need to look at how close Kerry came---considering his lack of substance, against a sitting war-time President."

I agree Kerry got closer than most would have liked. But there was another dynamic going on that doesn't get a lot of scrutiny. Kerry only won one state that Gore didn't win in 2000, and that was a small EV northeastern states. NH maybe? But in all the states that Gore and Kerry won, The percentages they won by were much slimmer in 2004 than 2000.

At least some of that is due to the candidate, but everyone knows, even the Demwits, that some of that is the increasing irrelevance of the lame stream, old media. And once that toothpaste is out, it's not going to be easy to push it back in the tube. 2008 will see even less relevance of the LSM, and I think the kid gloves they treated Kerry with and the overwhelming rejection of their "Kerry Good, Bush Bad" message taught them that that play isn't going to work anymore.

Another thing is that I think with Kerry, the LSM showed unbelievable restraint in what they didn't cover. But that was a game they can't play anymore either, because the Beast wouldn't be an unknown to people outside of NY and MA. They may as well try to stop night from falling than not report the stench that comes from the klintoons. There's so much stench that comes from them that the only thing that would smell worse is if LSM ignored it completely.

I'm not saying the LSM would like it, but I think their little trick with Kerry won't play the same with Shrillary and they know it.

56 posted on 02/17/2005 10:23:21 PM PST by libs_kma (USA: The land of the Free....Because of the Brave!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: liberty2004
If I were Hillary [ugh]...

I would adopt hubby's strategy and split the opposition's vote using some west-coast or sunbelt RINO like McCain, running as an independent like Perot or Anderson.

Someone like McCain is doubly dangerous, since a third-party McCain ticket would split the male vote as well as the Republican vote, while tending to corral the female vote for Hillary.

If I were a Republican strategist, I would counter this move by nominating someone like Rice for the top Republican candidate slot. Rice would steal the feminist thunder and attract minorities, without substantially diluting the conservative male vote (IOW, an ideal, or near-ideal, Republican headliner for the 2008 ticket). A third party McCain candidacy would then probably fold under the pressure of being perceived as just another old white guy being squeezed by two women candidates on either end of the political spectrum. (With apologies to toe-suckers everywhere!)

This scenario would be enhanced by Cheney taking early leave of the V.P. for medical reasons and being replaced by Rice sometime (say) in early 2006.

57 posted on 02/17/2005 10:30:10 PM PST by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

w did not win by much. Kerry was a disaster, i think 08 is ominious for us. We might be able to win, but it is not going to be as easy as 88.


58 posted on 02/17/2005 10:32:07 PM PST by genghis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Leave Hills thighs out of this!


59 posted on 02/17/2005 10:36:32 PM PST by fish hawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: zarf
Evan Bayh will win the election.

Evan Bayh. Bwaaaaahahahahahahahahaaaaaa!

60 posted on 02/17/2005 10:39:32 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (This just in from CBS: "There is no bias at CBS")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-168 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson